8 slides with speaker notes

Unacceptable

Needs Improvement

Competent

Exemplary

Compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods using graphical and analytical methods. Develop a flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Develop the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not develop or incompletely developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Did not develop or incompletely developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Points:

24 (15.00%)

Partially developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Partially developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Points:

27.2 (17.00%)

Satisfactorily developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Satisfactorily developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Points:

32 (20.00%)

Thoroughly developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Thoroughly developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Analyze the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Next, categorize whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Provide a rationale for your response.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not submit or incompletely analyze the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Did not submit or incompletely categorize whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

24 (15.00%)

Partially analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Partially categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

27.2 (17.00%)

Satisfactorily analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Satisfactorily categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

32 (20.00%)

Thoroughly analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Thoroughly categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

Discuss the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Discuss the differences between the two sets of feelings. Are these differences important? Provide a rationale for your response.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not discuss or incompletely discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Did not discuss or incompletely discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Did not provide an answer or incompletely provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

24 (15.00%)

Partially discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Partially discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Partially provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

27.2 (17.00%)

Satisfactorily discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Satisfactorily discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Satisfactorily provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

32 (20.00%)

Thoroughly discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Thoroughly discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Thoroughly provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

Select the method that was the most accurate. Provide a rationale for your response.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Did not select or incompletely selected the method that was the most accurate. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

24 (15.00%)

Partially selected the method that was the most accurate. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

27.2 (17.00%)

Satisfactorily selected the method that was the most accurate. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points:

32 (20.00%)

Thoroughly selected the method that was the most accurate. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

Integrate two references.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

No references provided and sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, or lack in-text citations.

Points:

6 (3.75%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices and/or sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

Points:

6.8 (4.25%)

References are mostly relevant sources of fair quality and are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

Points:

8 (5.00%)

References are highly relevant, high quality sources and are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

Complete presentation requirements.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Presentation does not have 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is no consistent theme or design and slides are difficult to read.

Points:

6 (3.75%)

Presentation does not have 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide and/or there is no consistent theme or design in the presentation. Some slides may be difficult to read.

Points:

6.8 (4.25%)

Presentation includes at least 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is a theme or design throughout the presentation but some slides may contain too much information to be easily read.

Points:

8 (5.00%)

Presentation includes 8 or more slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is a consistent theme or design throughout and all slides are easy to read.

Writing and support for ideas.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

6 (3.75%)

Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

6.8 (4.25%)

Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Points:

8 (5.00%)

Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Writing, grammar, and mechanics.

Points:

0 (0.00%)

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Points:

6 (3.75%)

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Points:

6.8 (4.25%)

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Points:

8 (5.00%)

Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.