Case study 2
Case Study II: Service Learning and You
One of the criticisms of service learning is that students perceive their experiences as ‘‘charity’’ or ‘‘volunteer work’’ rather than as a form of learning or an act of social change (Artz, 2001;
Bickford & Reynolds, 2002; Morton, 1995). Oster-Aaland and her colleagues state, ‘‘[s]ervice learning is not just serving, as a student might do by working for weeks as an intern. Nor is the learning just cognitive; instead the learning grows out of application and reflection’’ (2004, p. 349).
So how has this project affected YOU? Not the group, not the agency you are working with— YOU . Read the seven articles posted with this assignment and reflect critically on your thoughts during the process.
References
Artz, L. (2001). Critical ethnography for communication studies: Dialogue and social justice in service-learning. Southern Communication Journal, 66, 239–250. DOI: 10.1080/10417940109373202.
Badger, L. N. (2017). Beyond the charity-service paradigm: Building ethical platforms for social justice education with those most affected. Communication Education, 66, 371–373. DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1291981
Bickford, D. M., & Reynolds, N. (2002). Activism and service learning: Reframing volunteerism as acts of dissent. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 2, 229–252. DOI: 10.1215/15314200-2-2-229.
Endres, D., & Gould, M. (2009). ‘‘I am also in the position to use my whiteness to help them out’’: The communication of whiteness in service learning. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 418–436. DOI: 10.1080/10570310903279083
Hartnett, S. J. (2010). Communication, social justice, and joyful commitment. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 68–93. DOI: 10.1080/10570310903463778
Morton, K. (1995). The irony of service: Charity, project and social change in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 19–22.
Oster-Aaland, L. K., Sellnow, T., Nelson, P. E., & Pearson, J. (2004). The status of service learning in departments of communication: A follow-up study. Communication Education, 53, 348–356. DOI: 10.1080/0363452032000305959