4 Pages + Calculation on excel Make sure to follow the rubric carefully
BUSI 690
CASE STUDY: HISTORICAL FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT
GRADING RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|
|||
|
Content 70% 91 Points |
Advanced (A) |
Proficient (B) |
Developing (< C) |
Not present |
Points Earned |
|
Historical Financial Statements (35 points) |
32 to 35 points · Completes a thorough analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years. |
28 to 31 points · Completes an analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes most of the horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years. |
1 to 27 points · Completes a basic analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes some of the horizontal and vertical changes for each line item for the 3 most current years.
|
0 points No key components were included. |
|
|
Ratios (21 points) |
19 to 21 points · Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and correctly calculated. · Competitor ratios are present and correctly calculated. · Changes between years are included. |
16 to 18 points · Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and more than half are correctly calculated. · Competitor ratios are mostly present and correctly calculated. · Most of the changes between years are included. |
1 to 17 points · Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage, Activity, and Price-to-Earnings ratios are present and less than half are correctly calculated. · Some of the competitor ratios are present and correctly calculated. · Some of the changes between years are included. |
0 points
No key components were included. |
|
|
Financial Analysis Narrative (35 points)
|
32 to 35 points · Financial analysis included clear comparisons to the identified competitor and to the industry. · The financial position of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was clearly identified and discussed. · Analysis of the firms financial position was clear and areas of weakness or strength were identified. · The analysis was supported by research.
|
28 to 31 points · Financial analysis included mostly clear comparisons to the identified competitor and to the industry. · The financial position of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was identified and discussed. · Analysis of the firms financial position was mostly included and some areas of weakness or strength were mostly identified. · The analysis was mostly supported by research. |
1 to 27 points · Financial analysis included some clear comparisons to the identified competitor and/or to the industry. · The financial position of the firm and its impact on strategic choice was mostly identified and some discussion was included. · Analysis of the firms financial position was briefly described but areas of weakness or strength were not clearly identified. · The analysis included some research.
|
0 points
No key components were included.
|
|
|
Structure 30% 39 points |
Advanced (A) |
Proficient (B) |
Developing (< C) |
Not present |
|
|
Grammar/Spelling/ Format (39 points) |
33 to 39 points Proper spelling and grammar are used. APA format including, citations and references are correct. |
25 to 32 points Between 1–4 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. |
1 to 24 points Between 5–9 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present.
|
0 points More than 10 spelling, grammar, format, or citation errors are present. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points |
/130 |
Instructors Comments: