Donatos Case Study

Criteria Ratings Points

Content - Case Analysis

24 to >22.0 pts

Advanced

Insightful throughout. Completely developed all relevant information. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.

22 to >18.0 pts

Proficient

Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.

18 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.

0 pts

Not Present

24 pts

Content - Synthesis of course theories/ concepts and case analysis

24 to >22.0 pts

Advanced

Convincingly interpreted and linked to course theories/ concepts. Considers context and limits of position where appropriate. Key points were clearly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.

22 to >18.0 pts

Proficient

Relevant. Appropriately interpreted and linked to main course theories/concepts. Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.

18 to >0.0 pts

Developing

A few generalized connections made to course theories/concepts. Connections not clearly linked to case. Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.

0 pts

Not Present

24 pts

Content - Application of Scholarly Research

22 to >20.0 pts

Advanced

Author accurately applied 4 or more scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.

20 to >18.0 pts

Proficient

Author accurately applied at least 3 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.

18 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Author accurately applied 1 or 2 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.

0 pts

Not Present

22 pts

Structure - Mechanics

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are more than 3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure - APA Style

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required items: title page, running head, font type and size, line spacing, headings, citations, and references.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the required items.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the required items.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Structure - Word Count

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

The minimum word count 900 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The word count of at least 800 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The word count of 500–799 words. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140