Reserved for Hifsa

Criteria Ratings Points

Discussion 80 to >71.0 pts

Advanced

Criteria include the following: 1. Great discussion of whether the experience levels of the employees played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 2. Great discussion of how Leadership styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 3. Great discussion of how management styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 4. Great discussion of how types of power may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 5. A Pareto analysis was developed that lists the three most important problems causing the decrease in profit. 6. The narrative flows very well and remains focused throughout the paper. 7. At least 4 of the required peer-reviewed source citations are from peer-reviewed journals published within the past 4 years and 1 text citation. 8. Biblical concepts are fully integrated into the discussion.

71 to >55.0 pts

Proficient

Criteria include the following: 1. Good discussion of whether the experience levels of the employees played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 2. Good discussion of how Leadership styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 3. Good discussion of how management styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 4. Good discussion of how types of power may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 5. A Pareto analysis was developed that lists the two most important problems causing the decrease in profit. 6. The narrative flows somewhat well and remains focused throughout the paper. 7. At least 3 of the required peer-reviewed sources are from peer-reviewed journals published within the past 4 years and 1 text citation. 8. Biblical concepts are partially integrated into the discussion.

55 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Criteria include the following: 1. Some discussion of whether the experience levels of the employees played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 2. Some discussion of how Leadership styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 3. Some discussion of how management styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 4. Some discussion of how types of power may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 5. A Pareto analysis was developed that lists the one most important problem causing the decrease in profit. 6. The narrative doesn’t flow well and is unfocused throughout the paper. 7. At least 2 of the required peer-reviewed sources are from peer-reviewed journals published within the past 4 years and 1 text citation. 8. Bible verses are mentioned into the discussion.

0 pts

Not Present

Criteria include the following: 1. No discussion of whether the experience levels of the employees played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 2. No discussion of how Leadership styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 3. No discussion of how management styles may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 4. No discussion of how types of power may have played a part in the company’s declining metrics. 5. A Pareto analysis was not developed. 6. There is no narrative. 7. No sources are from peer-reviewed journals. 8. Biblical concepts are not integrated into the

80 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | MGMT501_B02_202130

Criteria Ratings Points

discussion.

APA Format 10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Proper APA format is used.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Between 1-3 APA formatting errors are present.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Between 4-6 APA formatting errors are present.

0 pts

Not Present

More than 6 APA formatting errors are present.

10 pts

Grammar/Spelling 10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

Proper spelling and grammar are used.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Between 1-3 spelling and grammar errors are present.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Between 4-6 spelling and grammar errors are present.

0 pts

Not Present

More than 6 spelling, and grammar errors are present.

10 pts

Headings 5 to >4.0 pts

Advanced

All of the required headings are included

4 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

Most of the required headings are included.

3 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Some of the required headings are included

0 pts

Not Present

The required headings are not included

5 pts

Word Count 10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

At least 1,000-1,500 words are submitted.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

900-999 or 1501-1600 words are submitted.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

800-899 or 1601-1700 words are submitted.

0 pts

Not Present

Less than 800 or more than 1700 words are submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 115

Case Study Grading Rubric | MGMT501_B02_202130