Case Study. Answers to Few Questions Required. Detailed. perfect Answer Required. A+. 15 hours
BUSI 690
CASE STUDY GRADING RUBRIC
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
150 Points |
Advanced (A) |
Proficient (B) |
Developing (< C) |
Not present |
|
Executive Summary (5 points) |
5 points · Provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents. · Contains enough information about the case study. · Captures the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. · Provides key evidence for the major points. · Closes with a brief summary and rationale for the chosen strategy. |
4 points · Provides an overview of the paper’s contents. · Contains some information about the case study. · Captures most of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. · Provides most key evidence for the major points. · Closes with a brief summary that contains some rationale for the chosen strategy. |
1 to 3.9 points · Provides a less than clear overview of the paper’s contents. · Lacking in information about the case study. · Captures some of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. · Provides some key evidence for the major points. · Brief summary and rationale are lacking in content for the chosen strategy. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Mission/Objectives Strategies
(5 points) |
5 points · Articulates existing mission and objectives. · Thoroughly discusses existing strategies. · Develops and discusses new mission statement. |
4 points · Discusses existing mission and objectives. · Discusses existing strategies. · Begins to develop and discusses new mission statement. |
1 to 3.9 points · Existing mission and objectives were present. · Discussed existing strategies in a broad manner, details were not included. · Discusses new mission statement.
|
0 points No key components were included. |
|
New Mission Statement (5 points) |
5 points · Creates a new mission statement with the 9 key components. · Includes the number before addressing the component. |
4 points · Creates a new mission statement with the 7-8 key components. · Includes the number before addressing the component. |
1 to 3.9 points · Creates a new mission statement with the less than 7 key components. · Includes the number before addressing the component. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Existing Business Model (5 points)
|
5 points · Clearly articulates the firm’s business model. · Explicates the value the business model is designed to capture. |
4 points · Articulates the firm’s business model. · Discusses the value the business model is designed to capture. |
1 to 3.9 points · Broadly discusses the firm’s business model. · Briefly discusses the value the business model is designed to capture. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
SWOT Analysis (25 points) |
23 to 25 points · Clearly articulates SWOT Analysis. · IFE Matrix/EFE Matrix · SWOT Bivariate Strategy Matrix · Provides sufficient outside research to .corroborate the OT. · Provides sufficient analysis of the results of the SWOT Analysis section. |
21 to 22 points · Articulates SWOT Analysis. · IFE Matrix/EFE Matrix included with minor errors · SWOT Bivariate Strategy Matrix included with minor errors · Provides good outside research to .corroborate the OT, some details were not included. · Provides analysis of the results of the SWOT Analysis section.
|
1 to 20 points · SWOT Analysis included, analysis needs improvement · IFE Matrix/EFE Matrix, errors were present · SWOT Bivariate Strategy Matrix, errors were present · Provides basic outside research to .corroborate the OT. · Provides basic discussion of the results of the SWOT Analysis section. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
BCG Matrix (5 points) |
5 points · Develops a thorough matrix by SBU and analysis.
|
4 points · Develops a matrix by SBU and analysis.
|
1 to 3.9 points · Develops a matrix, SBU is incomplete or incorrect, analysis should be expounded.
|
0 points No key components were included.
|
|
Competitors (10 points) |
10 points · Analyzes competitive forces. · Includes and analyzes the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). · Includes and analyzes the ratios of the firm’s two closest competitors (check the SBUs of each competitor for consistency). |
8 to 9 points · Analyzes most of the competitive forces. · Includes and analyzes most of the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). · Includes and analyzes most of the ratios of the firm’s two closest competitors (check the SBUs of each competitor for consistency). |
1 to 7 points · Analyzes some of the competitive forces. · Includes and analyzes some of the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). · Includes and analyzes some of the ratios of the firm’s two closest competitors (check the SBUs of each competitor for consistency).
|
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Financial Statements and Analysis (15 points) |
13.8 to 15 points · Completes a thorough analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes changes (deltas) for each line item for the 3 most current years. |
12.6 to 13.6 points · Completes an analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes most of the changes (deltas) for each line item for the 3 most current years. |
1 to 12.5 points · Completes a basic analysis of the firm’s financial statements for the 3 most current years. · Income Statement · Balance Sheet · Statement of Cash Flows · Analysis includes some of the changes (deltas) for each line item for the 3 most current years. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Ratio Analysis (10 points) |
10 points Analyzes ratios from the most current and available 3 years with deltas and analysis.
|
8 to 9 points Analyzes most ratios from the most current and available 3 years with deltas and analysis.
|
1 to 7 points Analyzes some of the ratios from the most current and available 3 years with deltas and analysis.
|
0 points
No key components were included. |
|
Alternative Strategies (10 points) |
10 points Lists alternative strategies (giving advantages and alternatives for each). |
8 to 9 points Lists 2 or more alternative strategies (giving advantages and alternatives for each). |
1 to 7 points Lists less than 2 alternative strategies (giving advantages and alternatives for each).
|
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Pro-Forma Financial Statements (10 points) |
10 points · Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. · Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy. · Includes Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios. |
8 to 9 points · Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years with minor errors. · Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy, with 2-5 minor errors. · Includes most of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios. |
1 to 7 points · Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. · Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 without strategy, there are greater than 6 errors. · Includes some of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
NPV and EPS/EBIT (10 points) |
10 points · Develops an NPV figure/table. · Clearly articulates the cost of the strategy (-cf0). · Clearly articulates the subsequent Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV analysis. · Thoroughly analyzes the NPV. · Includes and analyzes the EPS/EBIT figure/table. |
8 to 9 points · Develops an NPV figure/table, some minor errors. · Articulates the cost of the strategy (-cf0). · Articulates the subsequent Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV analysis. · Analyzes the NPV. · Includes and discusses the EPS/EBIT figure/table. |
1 to 7 points · Develops an NPV figure/table, calculation is incorrect or missing key components. · Discusses but does not include details of the cost of the strategy (-cf0). · Discusses the Pro-Forma cash flows (cf) for the NPV, lacks detail and thoughtful analysis. · Discusses the NPV, analysis should be further developed. · Includes, without analysis the EPS/EBIT figure/table.
|
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Recommended Strategies and Objectives (10 points) |
10 points · Thoroughly analyzes the new strategy. · States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy. · Includes an action timetable agenda for accomplishing the new strategy. |
8 to 9 points · Analyzes the new strategy. · States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy, minor details missing. · Includes a timetable agenda, with most details, for accomplishing the new strategy. |
1 to 7 points · Thoroughly analyzes the new strategy. · States and discusses the cost to implement the new strategy, missing details. · Includes a basic timetable agenda for accomplishing the new strategy, additional details are needed. |
0 points No key components were included. |
|
Structure 25 points |
Advanced (A) |
Proficient (B) |
Developing (< C) |
Not present |
|
Grammar/Spelling/ Format (25 points) |
23 to 25 points Proper spelling and grammar are used. APA format including a cover page, citations and references are correct.
|
21 to 22 points Between 1–4 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present. |
1 to 20 points Between 5–9 spelling, grammar, format or citation errors are present.
|
0 points More than 10 spelling, grammar, format, or citation errors are present.
|