Business & Finance Case Study:Public Administration from the 1930's and 1940's Assignment

Criteria Ratings Points

Facts 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

The writing is advanced. The author writes in complete, clear sentences. Excellent details about the facts of the case are provided, painting a comprehensive picture of the case key elements for the reader.

8 to >6 pts

Proficient

The writing is proficient. Complete sentences are used. An overview of main facts about the case are provided, but some key elements are missing or unclear for the reader.

6 to >0 pts

Developing

Several facts about the case are poorly developed or missing. Key elements about the case are missing.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Decisions 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Clearly identified the decisions that were made by stakeholders in the Case Study. The issue of appropriate decision making is fully developed through examples from the case study.

8 to >6 pts

Proficient

Most decisions made by stakeholders in the Case Study are identified. The issue of appropriate decision making is discussed with vague or weak examples from the case study.

6 to >0 pts

Developing

Identified few of the decisions that were made by stakeholders in the Case Study. The issue of appropriate decision making is missing or weak without examples from the case study.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Solutions 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Discussed alternative solutions to the problem that presented a clear and concise solution to the problem. The solution is research-based and scientifically proven.

8 to >6 pts

Proficient

Discussed alternative solutions to the problem that presented a clear and concise solution to the problem. The solution is research-based with slightly weak connections to science.

6 to >0 pts

Developing

Discussed alternative solutions to the problem that presented a vague and disorganized solution to the problem. The solution is not research-based with weak or non-existent connections to science.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM475_D01_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Biblical World View 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Biblical application is clear, and concise, rooted in Scripture. Connects to public administration practices in the case and demonstrates the influence world view has on personal perspective.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Biblical application is rooted in Scripture. Connects broadly to public administration practices in the case and demonstrates the influence world view has on personal perspective.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Biblical application is alluded to. Missing connections to public administration practices in the case. Missing demonstration of the influence world view has on personal perspective.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Organization of Content/Subheadings

5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Content is organized by topic area – Facts, Decision, Solutions and delineated by subheadings. The sentences are relevant to the topic as organized by the paper framework.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Content is organized by topic area – Facts, Decision, Solutions, but not delineated by subheadings. The sentences are relevant to the topic as organized by the paper framework.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Content is not organized by topic area – Facts, Decision, Solutions, and subheadings are missing. The sentences are may be relevant to the topic as organized by the paper framework.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Mechanics & Length 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Spelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited in current APA format. Length requirement of 400 words is met.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Spelling and grammar has some errors. Sentences are presented as well. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited with some current APA format. Length consists of at least 350 words.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Spelling and grammar errors are distracting from content. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format. Length consists of 349 words or less.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM475_D01_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

APA Formatting 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Bibliography is cited correctly in APA format.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Bibliography is cited with 1-5 errors in APA format.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Bibliography is cited with 6 or more errors in APA format.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Total Points: 50

Case Study Grading Rubric | PADM475_D01_202620