Case study
SUBS 505 Case Study Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 140 |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Content of Case Study |
126-140 points History given is clear and thorough Most relevant history reported to justify diagnoses and treatment Clear diagnoses and support for diagnoses Well-established argument for treatment Used empirical evidence to support treatment recommendations Understanding of SUD’s/ treatment is evident Substantive; good development of ideas and concepts Appropriate introduction and conclusion 12 pages of content
|
118-125 points History given is clear but expansion needed Some relevant history reported to justify diagnoses and treatment Diagnoses and/or support for diagnoses needs expansion Some appropriate argument for treatment Some evidence to support treatment recommendations Understanding of SUD’s/ treatment is evident Some good development of ideas and concepts Close to 12 pages of content
|
1 - 117 points History is not thorough History does not justify diagnoses Diagnoses are not clear/lack support Argument for treatment is missing or not clear Lack of empirical evidence to support treatment recommendations Understanding of SUD’s/ treatment is not demonstrtated Poor development of ideas and concepts Missing introduction and/or conclusion 12 pages of content not met |
0 points Not Present |
|
Structure 60 |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Mechanics |
18-20 points No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate. |
15-17 points Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate. |
1-14 points Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. |
0 points Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is difficult to understand. Word choice is poor. |
|
APA Format Elements |
18-20 points Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed |
15-17 points Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. |
1-14 points Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect. |
0 points Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Running head, and References are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect. |
|
Research Elements |
18-20 points Appropriate representation of readings and presentations, including both books and multiple presentations from the course Arguments and recommendations are correctly supported with research |
15-17 points Some appropriate representation of readings and presentations, including both books and at least one presentation from the course Arguments and recommendations are correctly supported with research |
1- 14 points Some inclusion of readings and/or presentations from the course. Arguments and recommendations are somewhat supported with research |
0 points Appropriate sources are not used or sources are lacking entirely. Arguments and recommendations are not supported with research. |
|
Total 200 |
Advanced 182 - 200 |
Proficient 168-181 |
Developing 1 - 167 |
Not present |
|
Professor Comments |
|