stem

CaseStudyAnalysisWorksheetv22.docx

Name:

Case Study Title:

Briefly What happened? Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the article(s) used and a brief summary of the case. Be sure to give enough information that the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were seen as wrong.

Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively impacted: [This does not need to be a complete list, but you should include a minimum of four major stakeholders (not stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders) unless it is clear there were less than four. Briefly explain the relationship with the company – why they are stakeholders]

What was the final outcome? [Provide details about prison, fines, termination, and for how many individuals. Report any other outcome you find interesting. Include documentation.]

Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong? [Be sure to use keywords describing at least two moral theories from your compass (consequentialist, care, duty, act utilitarian, prima facie duties, etc.) that would allow you to classify the action as morally wrong. Alternatively, discuss why you may feel the action was morally acceptable. If your compass has only one theory, be sure to explain this as well.]

Put yourself in a position of leadership and describe what you would put in place that would have prevented this in the first place or keep it from happening again. Alternatively, what rules would you implement to justify the action:

Name:

Case Study Title

Briefly

What happened?

Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the

article(s) used and a brief summary of the case.

Be sure to give enough information that

the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were

seen as wrong.

Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively

impacted

[

This does not need to

be a complete list,

but you should

include a minimum of four

major stakeholders (not

stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders)

unless it is clear there

were less than four.

Briefly explain the relationship with the company

–

why they are

stakeholders

]

What was the final

outcome?

[

Provide details about

prison, fines, termination, and for

how many individuals

. Report any other outcome you find interesting.

Include

documentation.

]

Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong?

[Be sure to use keywords

describing

least two moral theories from your compass

(consequentialist, care, duty,

act utilitarian, prima facie duties,

etc.

)

that would allow you to classify

the action as

Name:

Case Study Title:

Briefly What happened? Provide a properly formatted MLA or APA reference for the

article(s) used and a brief summary of the case. Be sure to give enough information that

the reader does not need to guess why the person blew the whistle, what actions were

seen as wrong.

Key Stakeholders and how were they negatively impacted: [This does not need to

be a complete list, but you should include a minimum of four major stakeholders (not

stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders) unless it is clear there

were less than four. Briefly explain the relationship with the company – why they are

stakeholders]

What was the final outcome? [Provide details about prison, fines, termination, and for

how many individuals. Report any other outcome you find interesting. Include

documentation.]

Describe why you feel the actions were morally wrong? [Be sure to use keywords

describing at least two moral theories from your compass (consequentialist, care, duty,

act utilitarian, prima facie duties, etc.) that would allow you to classify the action as