CASE STUDY ANALYSIS: EARLY CHILDHOOD

1/31/22, 2:11 PM Case Study Analysis: Early Childhood Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PSY/PSY6015/220100/Scoring_Guides/u04a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Case Study Analysis: Early Childhood Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Week 4 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study.

27%

Does not identify lifespan development theories.

Identifies but does not analyze lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study.

Analyzes lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study.

Analyzes lifespan development theories to determine the most appropriate theory or theories to apply to the case study. Provides justification for the selection or selections by citing supporting research and/or relevant examples from similar circumstances.

Apply the appropriate lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process.

27%

Does not apply a lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process.

Applies a lifespan development theory that does not support the identified intervention process or is inappropriate to the circumstances described.

Applies the appropriate lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process.

Applies the appropriate lifespan development theory to support an identified intervention process and supports the selection of the theory with recent academic research and/or examples from similar circumstances.

Describe the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study.

26%

Does not identify the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study.

Identifies rather than describes the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study.

Describes the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study.

Analyzes the potential impact of individual and cultural differences on development for the current age and context described in the case study, and supports analysis with recent academic research and/or examples from similar circumstances.

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

10%

Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.

Conveys purpose in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

10%

Does not apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from good scholarship.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.

Applies APA style and formatting to scholarly writing. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to stylistic conventions, document structure, and source attributions.