2 pages

profileCodyHaush
CaseStudy4Rubric.doc

Case Study #4 Rubric

Intro to Pubic Health and Preventive Medicine Fall 2018

CATEGORY

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Content

(20 pts)

The responses provide relevant and specific details and these details are described thoroughly. Concepts from throughout the course are incorporated.

The responses provide relevant details with good supporting details for the topic.

The responses provide insufficient content and supporting details for the topic.

The responses provide minimal to no content related to the topic.

Organization

(10 pts)

The responses are very well organized. Ideas flow in a logical sequence with clear transitions.

The responses are pretty well organized. Some ideas seem out of place. Good transitions are used.

The responses are hard to follow. The transitions are sometimes not clear.

Ideas seem to be randomly arranged, making the responses impossible to follow.

Requirements

(5 pts)

All of the requirements (typed, font, citations) were met.

Almost all (about 75%) the requirements were met.

Most (about 50%) of the requirements were met, but many were not.

Many requirements were not met.

Conventions (Spelling and Punctuation)

(5 pts)

There are 0-1 spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in the case study.

There are 2-4 spelling or punctuation errors in case study.

There are 5-7 spelling and punctuation errors in the case study.

The case study has more than 8 spelling and punctuation errors.

Overall Case Study Effort

(10 pts)

Sentence structures are varied and language is precise; there are no run-on sentences or fragments.

The case study is completed in a thoughtful and reflective manner by the student; graduate-level quality effort is evident.

Some varied sentence structures with precise language; there are 1-2 run-on sentences or fragments.

The case study is completed in a thoughtful manner overall but some graduate-level effort seems to be lacking.

Limited variety of sentences and language is simplistic or limited; there are 3-5 run-on sentences or sentence fragments.

The case study lacks graduate-level effort and is completed haphazardly.

Limited variety of sentences and language is simplistic or limited; there are 3-5 run-on sentences or sentence fragments.

No graduate-level effort is made to complete the case study as required.

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 50