Cultural case study
|
|
CATEGORY |
7 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
Points |
|
Organization |
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and subheadings. |
Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs. |
Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed. |
The information appears to be disorganized. |
|
|
Quality of Information |
Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. |
Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. |
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. |
|
|
Sources |
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format. Including within text citations. |
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format. Or, Citations are accurate but within text citations are missing or inaccurate. |
Some sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format. Or, within text citations are missing. |
Most sources are not accurately documented. |
|
|
Paragraph Construction |
All paragraphs include introductory sentences, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. |
Most paragraphs include introductory sentences, explanations or details, and concluding sentence. |
Paragraphs included related information but were typically not constructed well. |
Paragraphing structure was not clear and sentences were not typically related within the paragraphs. |
|
|
Mechanics |
No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. |
1-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors |
4-5 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
6+ grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. |
|
Points TOTAL: /35