MIND MAP ASSIGNMENT APA STYLE
Case Study 2
Review your experiences with the simulation in the practice rounds. Read the relevant chapters in the textbook. Then read the article: Devinney, T. (2009). Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives 23, 44-56. On that basis:
2. Identify what you think is a critical component of your simulation company’s corporate social responsibility (an item from your mind-map). (Each team member MUST choose a different component.)
3. Find a high quality academic source (use the UCW library) that helps you understand that component’s strategic value and impact .
4. Briefly summarize the academic source in your own words. (maximum of 100 words)
5. Explain the relevance of your academic source to your case. (maximum of 100 words)
6. Develop a strategic recommendation for your simulation company based on your analysis and reading. A good strategic recommendation explains how your simulation results could be improved by a more effective application of the resources of your component. Ensure you frame your recommendation in terms of corporate social responsibility. (maximum of 150 words)
7. Prepare a report as follows using Microsoft Word or with Word .doc or .docx output, or .rtf output or other output acceptable to Turnitin (not .pdf):
· Cover page in APA style.
· Mind-map (could be a drawing, a jpeg from a photograph, or an insert from mind-mapping software (for exampleCoogle). Ensure the details of the mind-map are legible in your final document.
· A summary of the source. Correctly cite your work in APA style (there are multiple ways to do this. Choose the most appropriate.)
· An explanation of how the source assists your understanding.
· Your recommendation.
· A reference section which includes all works cited.
· Use APA essay style to organize the appearance of your report (margins, font, headings, etc.)
Grading:
This assignment will be marked out of 50 pts. as follows:
· 8 pts. for the quality of the mind-map
· 5 pts. for the quality of the academic source
· 8 pts. for the quality of the summary
· 8 pts. for the quality of the application
· 8 pts. for the quality of the recommendation.
· 8 pts. for the quality of the English
· 5 pts. for compliance with APA standards
Note that negative points are possible for serious errors.
BUSI 601 Case Study 1