case study

profilerachelrr
casestudy.pdf

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

Laidlaw,Inc

Case study Reference no 201-006-1

This case was written by John D Sullivan,Boston University.It is intended to be used as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation.The case was compiled from published sources and generalised experience.

© 2000,JD Sullivan,Boston University.Revised 2004. No part of this publication may be copied,stored,transmitted,reproduced or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner.

Distributed by The Case Centre North America Rest of the world www.thecasecentre.org t +1 781 239 5884 t +44 (0)1234 750903 All rights reserved f +1 781 239 5885 f +44 (0)1234 751125

e [email protected] e [email protected] case centre

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Laidlaw, Inc. Background

Founded in 1924, Laidlaw had run solid for almost 75 years. But in 1999, the

atmosphere changed for the Canadian corporation. Under an aggressive acquisition

strategy that consumed the 1990s, along with growth in revenue came a heavy burden of

long-term debt surpassing $3.1 billion. What had once been a profitable company

reporting Net Income of $346 million in 1998 had experienced a reversal of fortune. For

fiscal year ending August of 1999, Laidlaw’s Net Income plunged to ($1.1) billion and

for the nine months ending May of 2000, Net Income fell further to ($1.9) billion.1

As a short-term measure, management negotiated with bondholders to receive

sufficient consents to permit certain subsidiaries to enter into secured banking

agreements. The financing arrangements would provide a revolving line of credit in an

amount up to $150 million with a letter of credit in amount up to $50 million from a

group of financial institutions led by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. In addition,

a revolving line of credit would be available up to $125 million with a credit sub-facility

in an amount up to $25 million for Greyhound Lines, Inc. from Foothill Capital

Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo.

copyright 2000 – John D. Sullivan This case was written to stimulate class discussion and analysis and is not a critique of an effective or ineffective management situation. 1 Laidlaw – Investor Relations. www.laidlaw.com/laidlaw/investors/hls_three.html

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

The consent agreement, announced on October 25, 2000 in Dallas, Texas, only

provides Laidlaw and Greyhound with a short-term solution to their financial problems.

For the company to survive, it will need to implement a solid restructuring plan.

The Company

Laidlaw Inc. serves as a holding company and through operating its subsidiaries,

provides essential and specialized services dedicated to the transportation of people

throughout North America. Founded in 1924 by Robert Laidlaw, the company had built

a reputation for waste management. But by the early 1990’s, through an acquisition and

divestiture strategy (exhibit 1), the company became recognized for the yellow school

buses that hold its name. Under the leadership of James Bullock, the company sold off

non-core holdings and diversified into health care with the acquisition of American

Medical Response for approximately $1.1 billion in 1997. That same year, Laidlaw

added to its health care portfolio with the purchase of EmCare, an emergency room

manager, for $400 million. Adding to the company’s investment in waste management,

Laidlaw purchased Safety-Kleen, a company specializing in hazardous waste

management, in 1998 for $2 billion.

Under the umbrella of its core transportation business, Greyhound Canada was

acquired in 1997. To compliment this merger, Laidlaw followed with the purchase of

Greyhound Lines Inc., in 1999 for $800 million. Greyhound is the only nationwide

provider of scheduled inter-city bus transportation services in the United States.

In the last three fiscal years, the percentage of revenue generated by the United

States Operations has been 87.2%, 83.2% and 86.0%, respectively. The company intends

to continue to expand throughout North America in each of its core businesses.2

2 Laidlaw Inc., Securities and Exchange Form 10K. August 1999.

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Education Services

Laidlaw operates school buses and special education vehicles, primarily under the

names Laidlaw Transit, Mayflower Contract Services, and National School Bus Services

in the United States. In Canada, Laidlaw operates school buses under Laidlaw Transit

and Charterways. Although Laidlaw purchased seven education service businesses in

1999, revenue growth was primarily attributable to price and volume growth including

route additions and higher pricing on under performing contracts.

Laidlaw currently operates under 1,072 school boards in the United States and 61

in Canada providing transportation for approximately 2.3 million students each day.

Contracts in the United States are generally three to five year agreements with options by

the school board to extend the contracts or solicit new bids. In Canada, most contracts

are one-year agreements and negotiated or renewed annually. Rates are usually

established on a per-diem basis and vary with the number of buses and students and

length of each route. In addition to the transportation of students, the school bus fleet is

also utilized for charters.

Education services employs approximately 46,500 people to provide

transportation services of which 2,800 provide executive, supervisory, clerical, and sales

functions. Nearly 41,200 are considered part-time employees and approximately 47%

are members of collective bargaining groups. The management of this division believes

that management and work force have an excellent working relationship.

Transit and Tour Services

Laidlaw had acquired Greyhound Lines, Inc. during fiscal 1999 and had

previously acquired Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. in October 1997.

Greyhound serves the “value-oriented” customer by offering scheduled passenger service

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

that connects rural and urban markets throughout the United States and Canada with

3,700 destinations, 20,000 daily departures, and a fleet of approximately 2,500 buses.

Greyhound also provides package express service, charter bus service, and in many

terminals, food service. The company also provides services to municipal transit

customers through 225 contracts in the United States and Canada. Additional services

include para-transit services providing access to transportation for mobility impaired

individuals, scheduled services under private contracts, and package tours to major

tourist regions of the United States and Canada.

Approximately 24,800 people are employed to provide transit and tour services.

Of these employees, 3,400 persons serve executive, supervisory, clerical, and sales

functions. Nearly 5,400 employees are considered part-time and 9,900 are members of

collective bargaining agreements. The Amalgamated Transit Union or ATU, represents

5,000 of Greyhound’s employees. The largest ATU agreement, which covers drivers and

mechanics, expires on January 31, 2004.3

Greyhound’s business is seasonal in nature and tends to peak during the summer

months and major holidays. As a result, cash flows experienced by the company also

tend to be seasonal.

Major Competitors in Education and Transit Services

Although Laidlaw is the largest school bus company and special education

transport operator in North America, it competes directly with other large companies and

a substantial number of small local operators including school districts and other

municipalities that operate their own education transit system. When contracts with

3 Laidlaw Inc., Securities and Exchange Form 10K. August 1999.

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

school boards expire, competition for extensions or new contracts is most prevalent in the

areas of pricing and service.

The transportation industry is highly competitive and includes individual

automobile usage, low cost air travel, regional bus companies, and the train system.

Greyhound competes in this industry based on cost and convenience.

Coach USA Inc.

The largest bus charter service and the second largest bus company in the United

States, Coach USA is operating under the restructuring plan of its United Kingdom

parent Stagecoach Holdings. Coach USA provides airport ground transportation and

daily routes to special destinations for commuters. The company’s fleet consists of 9,500

buses, taxicabs, mini-coaches, and shuttle buses. Like Laidlaw, the company has fueled

its rapid expansion through acquisitions and now operates in 35 states in the United

States and throughout Canada.

First Group Plc.

First Group Plc., smaller than both Coach USA and Laidlaw, has taken advantage

of Britain’s deregulation of the bus, coach, train, and airport industries. The company

operates several rail lines in the UK and owns a 51% stake in the Bristol International

Airport. As with Coach USA and Laidlaw, much of the company’s growth has been

achieved through acquisitions. One acquisition in particular, Ryder’s bus division, has

brought the company to the United States.

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)

National Railroad Passenger Corporation, or Amtrak, carries approximately 21

million passengers each year and operates 22,000 miles through 45 states in the US. A

large “for-profit” company that has rarely been profitable receives subsidies through the

United States federal government to ensure its operation. To lure passengers away from

the lucrative shuttle flights on the East Coast, Amtrak has constructed a high-speed rail to

open in 2000.

Southwest Airlines

Southwest Airlines has expanded its low cost, no frills, and no reserved seats

approach to air travel to serve more than 55 cities and 29 states in the US. To curb

maintenance and training expenditures, the airline uses only Boeing 737s and currently

uses approximately 320 planes. To trim back office expenditures, Southwest offers

ticketless travel and operates its own reservation system. As part of the airlines

expansion plans, Southwest has increased its routes throughout the East Coast and

continues to thrive with its highly participative corporate culture and 27 years of

profitability.

Emergency Health Care Services

Laidlaw provides healthcare transportation services, primarily under the name

American Medical Response, and emergency room management services under the name

EmCare. In 1999, the company had announced plans to divest both of these operations.

The company provides health care transportation services from locations in 36

states in the United States and also operates in Ontario, Canada. These services consist

of critical care transportation services, non-emergency ambulance and transfer services,

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

and emergency response services. Annually, the company provides approximately five

million ambulance responses and has more than 200 agreements with municipal or

country public safety agencies to provide performance-based contracts for 911 responses.

The company also provides comprehensive on-site medical care and transport services

for all types of special events.

Laidlaw also offers physician practice management services to hospital based

emergency departments. The company recruits physicians, evaluates their credentials,

and arranges contracts and schedules for their services. The company also assists in such

operational areas as staff coordination, quality assurance, departmental accreditation,

billing, record keeping, third party payment, and other administrative services.

Currently, Laidlaw has approximately 300 contracts for the management of emergency

room departments and provides emergency services in 36 states to more than 5 million

patients.

As a result of poor financial performance, Laidlaw announced in March 1999 that

approximately 2,200 positions or 10% of this division’s workforce would be eliminated.

Under the restructuring plan, under performing locations would be closed or sold.

As of fiscal year end 1998, Laidlaw employed approximately 24,500 employees

in the health care division. Of these, 5,200 employees are executive, clerical,

supervisory, and sales. 5,900 employees are considered part-time and approximately

53% are members of collective bargaining agreements.

Major Competitors in Health Care Services

Laidlaw is the largest provider of health care transportation services in the United

States and competes both with large companies and a substantial number of smaller

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

operators. The primary competition with the renewal or extension of contracts is based

on price and service performed.

Emergency physician practice management is also emerged in heavy competition.

Competition for these contracts is usually based on cost and the ability to make

physicians available as needed. In addition, competition is also based on maintaining the

proper utilization and communication between the emergency room and other

departments within the hospital.

American Medical Alert Corp.

American Medical Alert offers medical dispensing devices and fire burglar alarm

monitoring. Nearly 95% of the company’s sales come from monthly fees for leasing and

monitoring its emergency response systems and other equipment. Primary customers for

the service include individuals, hospitals, retirement homes, and the City of New York’s

Homecare Service Program.

Community Medical Transport, Inc.

Community Medical Transport provides medical transportation offering

ambulance services for patients that require basic medical care or supervision during

transport to or from hospitals, nursing homes in the New York metro area.

Rural Metro Corporation

Rural Metro provides ambulance, fire protection, and other safety related services

to municipal, residential, commercial, and industrial customers in the United States. The

large health care ambulance provider, second only to American Medical Response,

responds to emergence calls and offers non-emergency transport between health care

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

facilities. Fees collected for ambulance services account for more than 80% of sales.

The company also provides municipal and commercial fire fighting services and provides

training for fire fighters for industrial manufacturing facilities. Rural Metro operates in

more than 450 communities in 26 states, Canada, and South America.

Med-Emerg International, Inc.

Med-Emerg International, Inc. is emerging as a player in Canada’s medical

industry. The company is divided into three primary divisions: Physician and Nurse

Recruitment Services, Physician Management Services, and HealthyConnect.com, an

online health care network. Med-Emerg International, Inc. owns clinics offering services

such as family practice, emergency care, chiropractic care, massage therapy, Chinese

medicine, and family counseling. The company also provides short-term physician and

nurse staffing and administrative support to emergency room departments and hospitals.

The company’s web site is designed to link patients, physicians, and service providers.

PhyAmerica Physician Group, Inc.

PhyAmerica Physician Group, Inc. provides contract physicians primarily to

emergency rooms to approximately 270 hospitals, government agencies, the military, the

Veterans Administration, and correctional facilities. The company has refocused its

attention to its main core contract business divesting businesses such as its HMO.

Other Business Segments

As of August 1999, Laidlaw owned approximately 44% of the shares of common

stock of Safety-Kleen Corp. Safety-Kleen provides industrial waste services designed to

collect, process, recycle and dispose of hazardous and industrial waste to more than

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

400,000 companies through over 200 locations. These services include collection and

recovery services, provided to industrial, commercial and institutional customers and

treatment and disposal services, defined by the technologies employed such as thermal

treatment, landfill, and specialty services. On September 13, 1999, Laidlaw announced

its plan to actively seek a buyer for its interest in Safety-Kleen.

In addition to financial under performance, Safety-Kleen has received several

class action suits since April 2000 alleging that the company had accounting

irregularities and may have misled investors. Following the suits, the company hired

Lazard Freres & Co LLC for financial advice. In the meantime, three top executives

were suspended in May 2000 as a result of the accounting irregularities and new

management has been set in place to resolve any further issues with the company’s

financial reporting.

In October of 2000, Laidlaw sold its Manchu Wok Chinese food business to an

investor group for an undisclosed amount. Manchu Wok is a chain of Chinese fast food

restaurants that operates throughout North America, as well as two units in Poland.

Major Competitors in Waste Management

Allied Waste Industries, Inc.

Allied Waste Industries, Inc. collects trash and garbage from approximately 9.9

million residential and commercial customers throughout the United States. As the

number two waste management operator behind Waste Management, Inc., the company

participates in every facet of the non-hazardous waste industry through 150 transfer

stations, 160 landfills, and 90 recycling facilities.

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Republic Services, Inc.

As the number three waste collector, Republic Services, Inc. provides waste

disposal services for commercial, industrial, municipal, and residential customers

through 151 collection companies in 24 states in the United States and one in Canada.

The company also operates 55 landfills and more than 80 transfer stations.

Waste Management, Inc.

Waste Management, Inc., formerly USA Waste Services, is the largest waste

service provider in the United States. The company serves municipal, business, and

residential customers in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Focusing on the

company’s core operations in North America, Waste Management is in the process of

selling its solid and hazardous waste management services in Asia, Europe, the Pacific

Rim, and South America.

Conclusion

Laidlaw is in a period of transition. Under an aggressive acquisition strategy, in

addition to new divisions and base businesses, the company has added a significant

amount of debt to its balance sheet. Under an agreement with its bondholders, the

company has renewed hopes with a short-term financing agreement. However, for the

company to survive, a restructuring plan must be set in place immediately. Otherwise,

the only option available is bankruptcy protection.

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 1

The Evolution of Laidlaw

1924 Founded in Ontario, Canada as a trucking company by Robert Laidlaw

1959 Company sold to Michael DeGroote

1969 Company shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange First Canadian solid waste management company acquired

1972 First Canadian intercity and charter bus company acquired

1978 First solid waste company acquired

1979 First Canadian school bus company acquired

1983 First US school bus company acquired Stock is listed NASDAQ

1984 Trucking business sold

1986 Entered US chemical waste management business with acquisition

1988 Canadian Pacific Limited purchased

1989 Tricil acquired – chemical waste management business

1990 DeGroote Retires

Class A & B listed NYSE

1993 MedTrans acquired – Enters US ambulance business James Bullock becomes new President

1994 USPCI acquired – Waste management business 1995 Mayflower acquired – US school bus and transit company Care Line acquired – US ambulance business 1996 Charterways and National School Bus acquired

Solid Waste Management Units sold

1997 American Medical Response acquired Laidlaw environmental sold Stock restructured to one class Greyhound Canada acquired EmCare and Spectrum acquired

1998 Laidlaw invests in Safety Kleen 1999 Greyhound Lines, Inc. acquired Sale of American Medical Response, EmCare & Safety Kleen announced

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 2

Acquisitions by Division

Nine Months Ended May 31 2000 1999 Education Services 6 7 Transit & Tour Services

2 7

Total 8 14

Exhibit 3

Financial Statistics

52 Week Low 0.063 (Nov 24, 00) 52 Week High 0.109 (Jan 5, 00) Beta 1.09 Daily Volume 729,000

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 4

Consolidated Balance Sheets Assets

(in millions)

31-May-00 31-Aug-99 Assets Current Assets Cash $189 $58 Investments $174 $209 Accounts Rec $329 $215 Other $96 $82 Total Current Assets $788 $564 Net Assets Discontinued Operations $505 $1,617 Long Term Investments Safety Kleen $0 $593 Other $206 $188 Total LT Investments

$206 $781

PP & E $2,208 $2,112 Less Depr. Amort $754 $632 Net PP & E $1,454 $1,480 Other Assets Goodwill $1,212 $1,212 Deferred Charges $11 $31 Deferred Income Tax $0 $68 Total Other

$1,223 $1,312

Total Assets $4,177 $5,754

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 5

Consolidated Balance Sheets Liabilities & Shareholder Equity

(in millions)

31-May-00 31-Aug-99 Liabilities Current Liabilities Accounts Payable $93.5 $139.4 Accrued Liabilities $353.3 $337.2 Current Long Term Debt

$3,457.2 $9.3

Total Current Liabilities

$3,904.0 $485.9

Deferred Items $166.9 $242.0 Long Term Debt $197.9 $3,113.3 Shareholder Equity Preference Shares $7.9 $8.0 Common Shares $2,222.6 $2,246.8 Foreign Currency Translation

($167.6) ($168.4)

Deficit ($2,155.0) ($173.3) Total Shareholders Equity

($92.1) $1,913.1

Total Liabilities & Equity

$4,176.7 $5,754.3

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 6

Long Term Debt As of August 1999 and August 1998)

(in millions)

Weighted Average

Interest Rate Book Value Maturity 1999 1998 1999 1998 Short Term Less than one year 0.072 0.061 $9.3 $1.8 Long Term Bank Debt 2000-2005 0.055 0.054 $649.2 $454.8 Notes and Other 2000-2033 0.074 0.062 $137.3 $87.9 Debentures 2000-2027 0.074 0.076 $2,326.8 $1,747.3 Total Long Term Debt $3,113.3 $2,290.0 Total Debt $3,122.6 $2,291.8

Exhibit 7

Debt to Equity Ratio

E d u c a tio n S e r v ic e s

9 0 %

T r a n s it & T o u r

S e r v ic e s 1 0 %

E d u c a t io n S e r v ic e s T r a n s it & T o u r S e r v ic e s

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 8

Income Snapshot (in millions)

31-May-00 31-May-99 Education Services Revenue $1,255.1 $1,159.9 Income from Operations before Amortization

$188.1 $202.9

Income from Operations $167.1 $183.6 Transit & Tour Services Revenue $1,053.6 $530.2 Income from Operations before Amortization

$32.8 $26.4

Income from Operations $19.8 $18.5

Exhibit 9

Laidlaw Sources of Revenue 1997

Education Services

69%

Transit & Tour

Services 31%

Education Services Transit & Tour Services

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 10

Laidlaw Sources of Revenue 1999

Laidlaw Inc.- Revenue by business segment 1999

Education Services

59%

Transit & Tour Services

41%

Education Services Trans it & Tour Services

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 11

Laidlaw Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in millions)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

31-May 31-May 2000 1999 2000 1999 Revenue Education Services

$441.0 $414.8 $1,255.1 $1,159.9

Transit & Tour $370.6 $301.0 $1,053.6 $530.2 Total Revenue $811.6 $715.8 $2,308.7 $1,690.1 Operating Expenses

$581.8 $494.2 $1,637.2 $1,171.9

SG,& A $94.8 $77.9 $273.7 $142.9 Depreciation $60.2 $53.0 $176.9 $146.0 Amortization Expense

$14.8 $11.2 $34.0 $27.2

Income from Operations

$60.0 $79.5 $186.9 $202.1

Interest Expense ($56.6) ($27.0) ($134.3) ($60.4) Other Financing ($89.0) $0.0 ($89.0) $0.0 Other Income $2.5 $13.8 $10.3 $56.2 Earnings Safety Kleen

$0.0 $10.8 $10.8 $27.3

Impairment Loss ($58.8) $0.0 ($663.8) $0.0 Income Before Tax

($141.9) $77.1 ($679.1) $225.2

Income Taxes ($1.5) ($16.6) ($15.8) ($49.5) Tax Other

($85.0) $0.0 ($106.5) ($21.0)

Income\Loss from Op

($228.4) $60.5 ($801.4) $154.7

Discontinued Operations

($314.1) ($287.7) ($1,148.6) ($278.7)

Net Loss for the Period

($512.5) ($227.2) ($1,950.0) ($124.0)

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 12

Laidlaw EBITA by Business Segment 1997

Exhibit 13

Laidlaw EBITA by Business Segment 1999

Education Services

90%

Transit & Tour

Services 10%

Education Services Transit & Tour Services

Education Services

69%

Transit & Tour

Services 31%

Education Services Transit & Tour Services

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Exhibit 14

Stock Price History

Calendar Year 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 High Price $10.50 $16.63 $18.00 $12.25 $10.13 Low Price $5.06 $8.63 $11.63 $8.88 $8.25 Year End Price $5.25 $10.06 $13.63 $11.75 $9.88 High P/E 20.92 20.42 333.33 30.78 37.78 Low P/E 10.09 10.60 215.28 22.30 30.78 Year End P/E 10.46 12.36 252.31 29.52 36.85 Dividend Yield 5.33 2.58 1.47 1.62 1.62

Exhibit 15

Market Capitalization History

Stock Price History

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Ja n-

94

Ap r-9

4 Ju

l-9 4

Oc t-9

4

Ja n-

95

Ap r-9

5 Ju

l-9 5

Oc t-9

5

Ja n-

96

Ap r-9

6 Ju

l-9 6

Oc t-9

6

Ja n-

97

Ap r-9

7 Ju

l-9 7

Oc t-9

7

Ja n-

98

Ap r-9

8 Ju

l-9 8

Oc t-9

8

Ja n-

99

Ap r-9

9 Ju

l-9 9

Oc t-9

9

Ja n-

00

Ap r-0

0 Ju

l-0 0

Oc t-0

0

price History

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.

E du

ca tio

na l m

at er

ia l s

up pl

ie d

by T

he C

as e

C en

tr e

C op

yr ig

ht e

nc od

ed A

76 H

M -J

U J9

K -P

JM N

9I

201-006-1

Suggested Questions for Students 1. How did Laidlaw weaken its financial strength? 2. Is Laidlaw’s decision to sell its stake in Safety Kleen appropriate given

Safety Kleen’s legal troubles leading to filing for bankruptcy protection? 3. Given Safety Kleen’s financial troubles, how much is it worth? 4. Why is Laidlaw selling its health care division? 5. How would you value the health care division? 6. Would Laidlaw be better off implementing and fulfilling its restructuring

plan of the health care division? 7. How competitive is the health care market? 8. How strong are Laidlaw’s Education, Transit, and Tourist Divisions? 9. Are these divisions strong enough to turn Laidlaw around? 10. What restructuring recommendations would you suggest in addition to the

company’s strategy of selling Safety Kleen and its health care unit. 11. How would the unions impact any of Laidlaw’s restructuring plans?Does Laidlaw

have sufficient time to turn the company around?

P le

as e

no te

th at

y ou

a re

n ot

p er

m itt

ed to

r ep

ro du

ce o

r re

di st

rib ut

e it

fo r

an y

ot he

r pu

rp os

e. Y

ou a

re p

er m

itt ed

to v

ie w

th e

m at

er ia

l o n-

lin e

an d

pr in

t a c

op y

fo r

yo ur

p er

so na

l u se

u nt

il 16

-M ar

-2 02

3. P

ur ch

as ed

fo r

us e

by Y

ic he

ng L

iu o

n 16

-M ar

-2 02

2. O

rd er

r ef

F 44

25 09

.