PowerPoint

1

2

Case Study - IBM

Michell Muldrow:

BUS 6302:

Columbia Southern University:

Introduction

The focus of this case study is on IBM's history of adapting and surviving in the face of substantial technical changes, such as the advent of personal computers, cloud computing, and mobile technologies. However, IBM has also faced challenges, including a large loss as a result of the disruption of its mainframe computer business. Given that IBM's CEO, Virginia Rometty, is coping with escalating competition and declining sales in her existing areas, there are doubts about whether the company's present growth strategy will be adequate. The analysis's objective is to evaluate IBM's current situation and determine whether the company needs to change its strategy to address these issues.

Company Overview

In 1911, the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company (CTR), which eventually became known as IBM, was formed via the merger of four separate companies. The company, which was founded in 1924, now goes by the name International Business Machines (IBM). Over the years, IBM has supported a variety of technological advancements, such as the development of mainframe computers, personal computers, and cloud computing. Additionally, IBM's organizational structure has evolved over time, going from a centralized hierarchy to one that is today more dispersed. Cloud & Cognitive Software, Global Business Services, Global Technology Services, Systems, and Global Financing are the five main business areas that make up the company's present organizational structure.

Software, hardware, and services are some of IBM's most important goods and services. Software categories such as analytics, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cloud, collaboration, Internet of Things (IoT), security, and supply chain are all included in IBM's software products. The company offers servers, storage, and mainframes as hardware goods. Additionally, IBM provides a range of services, such as outsourcing, business consulting, and application management. Financially speaking, IBM's revenues have changed over time, reaching a high of $106.9 billion in 2011 and a low of $77.1 billion in 2020. A high of $16.6 billion was recorded in 2011 and a low of $5.5 billion in 2020 for the company's net income. With a high of $215.80 in 2013 and a low of $90.56 in 2020, the price of IBM's stock has likewise changed through time (Alsop, 2022).

Industry Analysis

Continuous innovation and technological developments characterize the continually changing IT sector. Major companies like IBM, Microsoft, Apple, and Google dominate the sector, which encompasses hardware, software, and services. The move to cloud computing, which has resulted in a decline in demand for conventional IT infrastructure and an increase in demand for cloud-based services, is one of the major market trends in the IT sector. The industry is also being shaped by the growth of mobile devices and the rising usage of artificial intelligence and machine learning technology.

Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Oracle are IBM's main IT sector rivals. While Amazon has established itself as a top supplier of cloud-based services through its Amazon Web Services (AWS) subsidiary, Microsoft is a significant player in the software and cloud services markets. Google, on the other hand, has made large investments in machine learning and artificial intelligence, which are vital to the IT sector. Oracle, a leader in corporate software and database management systems, is a significant rival of IBM. In order to be competitive in the face of these significant players, IBM will need to adapt to shifting market trends and look for new growth opportunities.

Problem Identification

The revenue decline and dropping stock price for the past 12 straight quarters are IBM's problems. Virginia Rometty, the company's CEO at the moment, is under pressure to identify fresh growth opportunities while fending off heightened competition. IBM is dealing with a number of issues, including competition in new key areas and diminishing revenues in established ones. Finding IBM's internal strengths and weaknesses as well as external possibilities and threats can be done with the aid of a SWOT analysis. A diverse array of goods and services, a lengthy history, and a strong brand recognition are some of the company's advantages. However, flaws include failing to react quickly to market changes and, in some cases, diminishing revenue.

Threats to IBM include fierce competition from both established businesses and new entrants, while opportunities include growth in future technologies like artificial intelligence and cloud computing (Benzaghta et al., 2021). It is possible to assess IBM's industry competition using Porter's Five Forces model. Due to the strong entry barriers in the technology sector, the threat of new entrants is comparatively minimal. However, because technology is growing quickly and new items can easily replace old ones, the threat of substitute products is very real. Due to the high number of suppliers in the business, their bargaining strength is relatively low. Buyers have a fair amount of negotiating power because there are alternatives for many of the goods and services they can purchase. The great number of rivals and ongoing innovation and development of new goods and services also contribute to the high level of rivalry among current competitors (Bruijl & Gerard, 2018).

Alternatives

Under the leadership of Virginia Rometty, IBM, a venerable tech powerhouse, is up against a formidable obstacle. The business is seeing a reduction in sales in its core markets while also dealing with more competition in emerging key markets. IBM has a range of potential solutions to this problem. One alternative is to stick with the company's present course of action, which entails expanding into complimentary software, service, and hardware markets. However, the company could not experience enough growth with this method. Another option is for IBM to prioritize entrepreneurship and innovation. This strategy entails promoting an innovative organizational culture and supporting employee entrepreneurship. This approach might aid IBM in spotting and seizing fresh opportunities while keeping a step ahead of its rivals.

The third option is for IBM to focus on its core skills by selling off some of its non-essential operations. This strategy would enable the business to streamline operations, cut expenses, and concentrate on its advantages. IBM can assess these options using a variety of management techniques, such as gap analysis, root cause analysis, and the McKinsey 7-S model. IBM can do a gap analysis to determine the difference between its present state and its ideal state. The company can use this study to pinpoint areas in which it needs to improve and then direct its resources in those directions. IBM can establish plans to address the root reasons of its sales loss with the aid of a root-cause analysis. Last but not least, IBM can evaluate its internal environment using the McKinsey 7-S model. This environment includes its strategy, structure, systems, personnel, staff, skills, style, and shared values. According to Salvarli and Kayiskan (2018), this approach can assist IBM in pinpointing the areas where it has to make adjustments to increase performance.

Recommendation

The suggested course of action in this situation is for IBM to concentrate on innovation and entrepreneurship. This strategy entails promoting an innovative organizational culture and supporting employee entrepreneurship. This approach might aid IBM in spotting and seizing fresh opportunities while keeping a step ahead of its rivals. By encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship, IBM can develop fresh goods and services that satisfy new consumer demands and benefit from cutting-edge technical developments. This strategy fits in nicely with contemporary developments in the tech sector, where businesses who innovate and adapt swiftly have a higher chance of success. Furthermore, IBM's key expertise in software and services are aligned with this suggested solution. By concentrating on innovation and entrepreneurship, IBM may use its knowledge in these fields to develop fresh, cutting-edge goods and services that satisfy client needs. This tactic can help IBM attract and retain top talent since an environment that values innovation and entrepreneurship is more likely to motivate employees.

Implementation Plan

Numerous steps and considerations must be made in order to implement the suggested solution for IBM. A supportive environment for innovation and entrepreneurship must first be created by the company. This can be achieved by a variety of actions, such as changes to the organizational structure, financial incentives for employees to look for unique ideas, and the encouragement of an experimental and risk-taking culture. IBM will also need to invest in research and development to make sure it is leveraging cutting-edge technologies and staying one step ahead of its competitors. IBM will then need to create systems and processes to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship. This entails creating a system for tracking and evaluating progress as well as a strategy for ideation and concept management.

To motivate staff to pursue novel ideas and make sure that resources are deployed effectively, this system should offer measurements and feedback. There are potential difficulties and hazards that must be taken into account, even though it is likely that this suggested solution will assist IBM in achieving sustained growth. These include the challenge of altering corporate culture, the risk of new projects failing, and the danger of failing to react quickly enough to shifting market trends. Furthermore, IBM must make sure it has the tools and resources required to support the application of the suggested solution (Martinez-Noya & Narula, 2018).

Conclusion

To sum up, the suggested course of action for IBM is to prioritize entrepreneurship and innovation. This strategy entails promoting an innovative organizational culture and supporting employee entrepreneurship. By putting this suggested method into practice, IBM will be able to develop fresh goods and services that cater to changing customer demands and profit from new technical developments. This approach is probably going to help IBM achieve sustainable growth and continue to be a leader in the tech sector, even though there are certain potential dangers and obstacles that need to be taken into account (Rothaermel et al., 2015).

References

Alsop, T. (2022, March 7). IBM global revenue 1999-2021. Statista.  https://www.statista.com/statistics/265003/ibms-revenue-since-1999/

Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M. M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review.  Journal of Global Business Insights,  6(1), 55-73. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/globe/vol6/iss1/5/

Bruijl, D., & Gerard, H. T. (2018). The relevance of Porter's five forces in today's innovative and changing business environment.  Available at SSRN 3192207.

Martinez-Noya, A., & Narula, R. (2018). What more can we learn from R&D alliances? A review and research agenda.  BRQ Business Research Quarterly,  21(3), 195-212.

Rothaermel, F., Grigoriou, K., & King, D. (2015).  IBM at the Crossroads. McGraw Hill Education.

Salvarli, M. S., & Kayiskan, D. (2018). An analysis of McKinsey 7-S model and its application on organizational efficiency.  International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research,  4(7), 103-111.