2 Case Studies- Psychopharmacology
MarieMe
Casepresentationrubric12.docx
QUALIT
Y OF WORK SUBMITTED: THE EXTENT OF WHICH WORK MEETS THE ASSIGNNED CRITERIA AND
WORK REFLECTS GRADUATE LEVEL CRITICAL AND ANALYTIC THINKING
15
points
Description
Excellent
(
15
-
13
points)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics ar
e addressed with a
minimum of 90
% containing exceptional breadth and depth about
each of the assignment topics.
Good
(12
-
11
points)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics ar
e addressed with a
minimum of 80
% containing good
breadth and depth about each of
the assignment topics.
Fair
(10
-
7
points)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is
either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor
(6
-
0)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or
more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: THE EXTENT OF WHICH WORK MEETS THE ASSIGNNED CRITERIA AND
WORK REFLECTS GRADUATE LEVEL CRITICAL AND ANALYTIC THINKING
15 points Description
Excellent (15-13 points) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a
minimum of 90% containing exceptional breadth and depth about
each of the assignment topics.
Good (12-11 points) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a
minimum of 80% containing good breadth and depth about each of
the assignment topics.
Fair (10-7 points) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is
either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor (6-0) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or
more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
