3 -- Discussions- international finance

Case Discussion Rubric

Page 1 of 2

Outstanding

100 points

Good

85 points

Average

75 points

Limited

65 points

Flawed

55 points

Demonstrates

Careful Reading

and Inquiry into

Subject

Discussion Post

• Shows serious contemplation of

readings.

• Shows original thought that goes

far beyond the

obvious.

Discussion Post

• Indicates reading was

completed.

• Addresses some of the questions

obvious answers.

Discussion Post

• Relies primarily on case summary

Discussion Post

• Suggests case scanned but not

read carefully

• Rehashes ideas from other posts

Discussion post

• Gives little indication that the

case was read and

assignment

completed.

• The Post was not relevant to the case

questions or current

discussion.

Responsibly cited

and provides

examples

Quotes used: • support writer’s

point (“proves”

it) • are original

(unexpected

quote choices

and/or uses

quotes from

multiple

places of the

text) • properly

integrated into

the discussion

• Properly

punctuated

Quotes used: • support writer’s

point (“proves” it) • are somewhat

predictable • are not well

integrated into

discussion

• some mechanical and/or

documentation

errors

Some quotes are

used, but: • There are too

few examples;

relies mostly on

generalization s • Some quotes do

not effectively

support writer’s

point • quotes are poorly

integrated

• citation errors • Diction is

ordinary

Some quotes are

used, but: • Paraphrase

dominates • quotes used are

not integrated • Quotes do not

make sense as

support • Quoted

material is out

of context

• Fails to use

capital letters or

punctuation

No quotes are used;

textual evidence

(even paraphrased

evidence) is flimsy

and/or

inappropriate • Citations are

missing

Case Discussion Rubric

Page 2 of 2

• Quotes are

properly cited.

• Contains multiple

documentation errors

Outstanding

100 points

Good

85 points

Average

75 points

Limited

65 points

Flawed

55 points

Engagement with

Others • Shows concerted

and honest effort

to engage

with others • Responds to

ideas in a way

that advances

discussion

beyond the

obvious • Interacts

easily &

accurately

with other

posts in the

thread

Responds in the

way highlighted

above at least 5

times.

• Shows attention

to other posts in

the thread • Incorporate s and

acknowledges

ideas

of others in

attempt to

advance the

discussion

(perhaps

in predictable ways)

Responds the way

described above 3-4

times.

• Offers little

interaction

with other

posts in the

thread • Mostly

summarizes

what others

have said

without adding

to discussion

Responds in the

way described

above 1-2 times.

• Does not

acknowledge

other posts • Misrepresents

content of other

posts

• Ignores other

posts in thread • Does not engage

with others