a case study

profileAbby 2017
CaseConceptform-Satir.docx

Satir Human Growth Model Case Conceptualization

For use with individual, couple, or family clients

Date:       Clinician:       Client/Case #:      

Introduction to Client & Significant Others

Identify significant persons in client’s relational/family life who will be mentioned in case conceptualization:

Adults/Parents: Select identifier/abbreviation for use in rest of case conceptualization

: Age:       Occupation:       Other:      

: Age:       Occupation:       Other:      

Children/Adult Children: Select identifier/abbreviation for use in rest of case conceptualization

: Age:      Grade: Other:      

: Age:      Grade: Other:      

: Age:      Grade: Other:      

: Age:      Grade: Other:      

Others: Identify all:      

Presenting Concerns

Describe each significant person’s description of the problem, focusing on OBSERVABLE behaviors:

:      

:      

:      

:      

Additional:      

Broader System: Description of problem from extended family, referring party, school, legal system, etc.:

Extended Family:      

Name:      

Name:      

Background Information

Trauma/Abuse History (recent and past):      

Substance Use/Abuse (current and past; self, family of origin, significant others):      

Precipitating Events (recent life changes, first symptoms, stressors, etc.):      

Related Historical Background (earlier incidents, family history, related issues, prior treatment, etc.):      

Communication and Validation Patterns

Describe the communication and validation patterns for all significant persons related to client:

: Stance(s) when feels invalidated: |_| Placating |_| Blaming |_| Superreasonable |_| Irrelevant

Relational dynamics that triggers survival stance:      

Relational/family belief or rule that informs this triggering dynamic:      

Relational dynamics that enable person to communicate congruently:      

: Stance(s) when feels invalidated: |_| Placating |_| Blaming |_| Superreasonable |_| Irrelevant

Relational dynamics that triggers survival stance:      

Relational/family belief or rule that informs this triggering dynamic:      

Relational dynamics that enable person to communicate congruently:      

: Stance(s) when feels invalidated: |_| Placating |_| Blaming |_| Superreasonable |_| Irrelevant

Relational dynamics that triggers survival stance:      

Relational/family belief or rule that informs this triggering dynamic:      

Relational dynamics that enable person to communicate congruently:      

: Stance(s) when feels invalidated: |_| Placating |_| Blaming |_| Superreasonable |_| Irrelevant

Relational dynamics that triggers survival stance:      

Relational/family belief or rule that informs this triggering dynamic:      

Relational dynamics that enable person to communicate congruently:      

Additional:      

Self-Worth and Self-Esteem

Describe the dynamics of each person’s sense of self-worth and self-esteem, including contexts in which each has greater or lesser sense of worth:

:      

:      

:      

:      

Additional:      

Describe dynamics of social location, such as cultural, gender, social class, or other diversity factors, that inform evaluation of self:      

Relational Life Chronology

Describe significant events, specifically those that may relate to sense of validation and worth, in family and/or relational life; please list in chronological order:

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Year:       Event:       Significance:      

Additional:      

Relational/Family Dynamics

Describe salient dynamics:

|_| Power struggle/coalitions in family: Describe:      

|_| Parental conflicts: Describe:      

|_| Expression of intimacy/warmth between parents/children and/or within couple: Describe:      

|_| Describe salient family/relational roles:

|_| Martyr:      

|_| Victim/helpless:      

|_| Rescuer:      

|_| Good/bad child:      

|_| Good/bad parent:      

|_| Other:      

Describe how client’s social location—ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, social class, and other diversity factors—inform these dynamics:      

Role of Symptom in System

Hypothesized homeostatic function of presenting problem: How might the symptom serve to maintain connection, create independence/distance, establish influence, reestablish connection, or otherwise help create a sense of balance in the family?      

[Type text]

3

© 2016. Diane R. Gehart, Ph.D. All rights reserved. www.masteringcompetencies.org