For Wizard Kim - CS

Criteria

Novice

Competent

Proficient

Facts of the Case

(Weight 25%)

50%

Critical facts omitted or substantial unessential facts included. Unable to apply or distinguish from other possible fact patterns or facts are merely copied from case.

75%

Most critical facts identified and communicated. Some unessential facts included.

100%

All pertinent facts have been described in a clear and concise manner. Distinguishing features of the fact pattern are highlighted.

Analysis

(Weight 40%)

50%

Analysis is deficient in reference to authoritative law. Analysis lacks cohesion and does not directly apply the rules to the facts. Analysis relies on general assumptions.

75%

Analysis is incomplete. Most rules are directly applied to the facts. Analysis is not perfectly logical or does not support issue stated.

100%

All rules are applied to all facts and the importance of each fact is explained in the analysis. Analysis is logical and supports the conclusion.

Procedural History

(Weight 10%)

50%

Case history is not sufficiently explained. Prior courts are not identified and their rulings are not included.

75%

Most case history is included. Some prior courts are identified and some prior rulings are included.

100%

All prior courts are identified and all prior rulings are included. Provides a complete case history.

Issue

(Weight 15%)

50%

Issues are not adequately identified or are too vague.

75%

The main issue is somewhat identified, but not is not detailed and concise. Peripheral issues are addressed.

100%

The main issue is clearly identified in a clear and concise manner and all peripheral issues are identified.

Rule

(Weight 10%)

50%

Authoritative law is not identified or the wrong law is identified.

75%

Most authoritative law is identified correctly.

100%

All authoritative law is identified.