Case Analysis
Case Analysis Guidelines
1. Basic Structure of the Case Analysis
The case analysis will be written in three parts:
A. Summary of the case (1 page)
a. The summary gives a brief overview of the problem that the case addresses.
b. Case: This section also provides the details of the case in the following order:
•Patient description
•Case history
• Investigations/treatment plan/ Spiritual/religious/cultural issues
•Expected outcome of the treatment plan (if given)
•Actual outcome (if given)
B. Religion/Culture/Ethics Discussion (1 page)
a. This section should highlight the main spiritual questions raised from the previous section with arguments for and against the point of view taken in the case.
b. This section should also deal with the worldview and cultural aspects of the patient and the students’ understanding of them.
c. The student will interact with the case the most in this section, making suggestions to help the patient.
C. Conclusion (½ page to 1 page)
a. The conclusion and final analysis highlights proposed solutions/recommendations for the patient and gives strategies for accomplishing these.
b. Any additional comments about the case should be inserted here.
D. References
a. Use at least one case of a similar nature to the present case to compare methods for dealing with problems (paradigm case).
b. This case should be cited on the final page
***The analysis should be double spaced in Times New Roman 12 point font and follow APA style, have 1 inch margins, with centered headings and be in third person.
*** Please make sure your paper is stapled and presented in class on time. I am not responsible to pages that are lost due to not being stapled.
2. Rubric
|
SECTIONS |
100% |
75 % |
50% |
25% |
0-10 % |
50 Points total |
|
INTRO/SUMMARY |
Content offers a thorough introduction, background of the case, giving the source of the case in correct APA style with no errors. |
Content offers a thorough introduction, background of the case, in correct APA style with few errors. |
Content offers an introduction, background of the case, in mostly correct APA style with several errors. |
Content offers a background of the case, in mostly correct APA style with many errors. |
Case offers little or no introduction or background and is not compliant with APA style, and has many errors |
10 |
|
DISCUSSION
|
Analysis recognized the patients’ worldview and the related spiritual/cultural issues and offers a detailed and correct explanation of their relevance for the patient. |
Analysis recognized the patients’ worldview and the related spiritual/cultural issues and offers a good explanation of their relevance for the patient. |
Analysis recognized the patients’ worldview and the related spiritual/cultural issues and offers some explanation of their relevance for the patient. |
Minimal recognition of the patients’ worldview and some of the related spiritual/cultural issues and offers a minimal and somewhat correct explanation of their relevance for the patient. |
Case offers almost no analysis of the patient’s worldview or related cultural issues, and is has several errors in understanding of the patient religious/cultural issues. |
15 |
|
|
Case analysis describes the proposed solutions in detail and the student makes alternative suggestions with a good understanding of the constraints of the case. |
Case analysis describes the proposed solutions and the student makes little alternative suggestions with a good understanding of the constraints of the case |
Case analysis gives little proposed solutions and the student makes little alternative suggestions with a basic understanding of the constraints of the case |
Case analysis gives little the proposed solutions and the student makes minimal alternative suggestions with minimal understanding of the constraints of the case |
Case analysis gives little the proposed solutions and the student makes minimal alternative suggestions with minimal understanding of the constraints of the case. |
15 |
|
CONCLUSION |
The conclusion and final analysis highlights proposed recommendations for the patient and gives strategies for accomplishing these. |
The conclusion and final analysis highlights proposed recommendations for the patient and gives strategies for accomplishing these. |
The conclusion and final analysis highlights proposed recommendations for the patient and gives strategies for accomplishing these. |
The conclusion and final analysis highlights proposed recommendations for the patient and gives strategies for accomplishing these. |
Little or no conclusion given, with little or no recommendations and strategies for implementation of patients’ goals. |
10 |