hot flashes, and cramping,

profilenikkyvu
Case_study_guild_use_rubric.docx

1. Three Differential Diagnoses: ( first one must be the primary diagnosis)

2. Pathophysiology for Diagnosis (each diagnosis) with etiology

3. Pertinence of Research Article (for primary diagnosis)

4. Plan of Care: Testing/Studies:

5. Pharmacological:

6. NONPHARMACOLOGIC METHODS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED ALSO

7. Patient Education:

8. Follow up:.

9. Use the rubric attached.

10. specifically focusing on gynecological (OBGYN) cases.

Directions:

submission should be based on actual clinical experiences and must highlight a GYN-related diagnosis, assessment, and management plan.

The case study should include a clear presentation of the patient's chief complaint, relevant medical history, physical examination findings, diagnosis, and a comprehensive management plan, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Additionally, you should provide a detailed explanation of the patient education you provided, focusing on the condition, treatment plan, and any lifestyle modifications or follow-up care.

Lastly, reflect on the challenges and learning experiences from the case.

study is well-organized, incorporates clinical guidelines, and follows any formatting and referencing requirements as outlined in the course syllabus.

This is just a sample; don’t use these medications. NOTE: Pharmacology interventions MUST BE IN THIS FORMAT

Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) 500 mg tablet orally every 12hrs for seven days

Acetaminophen 650 mg tablet orally every 4-6 hours as needed.

Ondansetron (Zofran) 8 mg tablet orally every 12 hours as needed for seven days.

APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer review scholarly resource cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)

Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but a journal article or text should be referenced.

Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.

DO NOT use any European Journal..

Please use reliable medical references such as the Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment book or UpToDate. Do not use WebMD, Wikipedia, etc., as these are not advanced practice references.  

APA format (if using outside sources). --.

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Chief Complaint

3 pts

Excellent

Clearly and concisely states the chief complaint

1.8 pts

Good

Partially states or unclear information

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing or incorrect information

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome History of Present Illness (HPI)

8 pts

Excellent

Thorough and detailed HPI

4.8 pts

Good

HPI is adequate but lacks detail

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Minimal or missing HPI

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome pertinent Past Medical History

4 pts

Excellent

Comprehensive PMH including OB/GYN history

2.4 pts

Good

Basic PMH without all necessary details

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Incomplete or missing PMH

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Review of Systems (ROS)

8 pts

Excellent

Complete and thorough ROS

4.8 pts

Good

Partial or missing systems

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing ROS

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Family & Social History (FH/SH)

2 pts

Excellent

Complete and relevant FH/SH

1.2 pts

Good

Incomplete or irrelevant FH/SH

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing FH/SH

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Physical Exam: Including In-Office Diagnostics

20 pts

Excellent

All appropriate systems examined with proper techniques

12 pts

Good

Some systems examined, but lacks thoroughness

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Incomplete or missing exam

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Differential Diagnoses 1: Working Diagnosis

10 pts

Excellent

Three clear diagnoses with solid rationales. Including pertinent positives and negatives.

6 pts

Good

Two diagnoses or partial rationales

0 pts

Needs Improvement

One or no diagnoses

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Differential Diagnoses 2

5 pts

Excellent

Working diagnosis defined with pathophysiologic support. Including pertinent positives and negatives.

3 pts

Good

Some definitions unclear or missing rationale

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Minimal or missing definitions

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Differential Diagnoses 3

5 pts

Excellent

One research article and two OB/GYN references used effectively. Including pertinent positives and negatives.

3 pts

Good

Partial or missing references

0 pts

Needs Improvement

No references used

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Plan of Care: Diagnostic Testing/Studies

4 pts

Excellent

Clear, appropriate tests/studies

2.4 pts

Good

No relevant testing

0 pts

Needs Improvement

No references used

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Plan of Care: Pharmacologic Treatment

5 pts

Excellent

Clear prescription in appropriate language

3 pts

Good

Partial or unclear prescriptions

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing or incorrect pharmacology

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Plan of Care: Patient Education

9 pts

Excellent

Comprehensive, including non-pharmacologic education

5.4 pts

Good

Partial or minimal education

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing education

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Plan of Care: Follow-Up

2 pts

Excellent

Clear and appropriate follow-up plan

1.2 pts

Good

Follow-up plan lacks detail

0 pts

Needs Improvement

No follow-up plan

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Research Article and 2 OB/GYN references: Neatness, Format, Terminology

15 pts

Excellent

Neat, typed, submitted on time, proper format

9 pts

Good

Some errors in presentation or format

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Disorganized or incorrect format

15 pts

Total Points: 100