Topic: Regent Park
PFP 152 Community & Social Services - Regent Park & YCAPP Case Study
Deadline: Week of March 26th, 2018
In partners (groups of two), you are required to conduct a case study analysis regarding a young
offender and a service provider in the Canadian criminal justice system. Through your analysis, you
will assess the individuals involved, the communities the case takes place in and the most
appropriate decision for the case, based on the concepts of the Canadian criminal justice system and
the community and social service sector.
There are three (3) parts to this case study analysis. All three parts must be completed and
handed in to receive full marks. Each part must have accurate APA referencing, including
citations. Failure to do so will result in a grade of zero (0).
Part One: Individual Party Analysis
In 1-2 pages, you will provide an individual analysis of the following parties:
1) Martin A. 2). Irene M.
Each analysis should consider the following:
A summary of each party’s involvement and/or role in the case. Personal and/or social problems each party is facing? Which theory/theories help explain each party’s role in the case - Conflict, Structural-Functionalism, Symbolic Interactionism?
The goals of each party. What are their needs and assets? Which Locus of Power(s) do they have? Which Locus of Power do they not have? How does this relate to the case?
Additional comments and/or reflections you may wish to add to your analysis.
Part Two: Community Analysis
1). In 1-2 pages, you will provide a community analysis on the following:
a). Regent Park community (c. 2005)
b). Youth Court Action Planning Program (YCAPP)
Each analysis should consider the following:
A summary of each community’s background and its relevance to the case. Personal and/or social problems that exist in each community and/or how are they addressed?
Which theory/theories help explain each party’s role in the case (Conflict, Structural-Functionalism, Symbolic Interactionism)?
The goals, needs and assets of each community player? Which Locus of Power(s) do they
have? Which do they lack? How does this relate to the case?
Additional comments and/or reflections you may wish to add to your analysis.
2). In one (1) page, list and describe the community and social services you could use to address this
case and why. How would these services support and satisfy the youth, the family, the Court and the
community? Note: these services should be real, existing services.
Part Three: Professional Recommendation to the Criminal Court of Law
In 2-3 pages, submit a final report indicating your decision and plan of service you devised for Martin
A. Using course concepts, your report should include the following criteria:
Your decision to work or not work with Martin (include your rationale) Martin A.’s background and factors the Court should take into consideration when deciding to detain or release the youth
Martin A.’s family background and its relevance to your decision and plan of service
Where Martin A. will reside, with whom and why (whether he is detained or released)
Martin A.’s plan of service (include the community and social services you will be using, why and when they will be available for Martin – should you decide to release him)
Any additional information that would be helpful for the Court to make its decision
Your report should address the needs of the youth, the family, the Court and the community while
upholding the principles of the (youth) criminal justice system. How your service plan addresses and
satisfies these needs should be included in your report.
Case Study Report Submission Must Haves:
Your report should be addressed to the Justice of the Peace/Judge using formal legal terminology. You also must describe your program and why you were asked to analyse this case.
Your analysis should be typed, double-spaced, 12” Times New Roman/Arial font and written in case report style (introduction, subheadings, concluding paragraph and formal language).
APA formatting, including citations and referencing, including APA title page.
Your analysis should also be relevant to the course and include course content. You will be graded in three areas: analysis, conceptualization and presentation.
5-8 pages in length
** Papers that do not include APA citations and referencing will not be graded.
**Case studies submitted late will receive a 10% deduction on the first day, and 5%
deduction per day thereafter. After seven (7) days, case studies will receive a mark of zero (0).
PFP 152 Community & Social Services Regent Park & YCAPP Case Study
Name: ____________________________ Student ID: _________________________
Name: ____________________________ Student ID: _________________________
Part One: Individual Analysis
Part Two: Community Analysis
Part Three: Recommendation to Court
Technicality:
* Papers that do not include APA citations and referencing will not be graded.
Total: / 35 marks
Total: 30% of Final Grade
Background of each party /2 marks
Theoretical application to each party /3marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each party /3 marks
Background of each community player
/2 marks
Theoretical application to each community player /3 marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each community
player
/3 marks
Community and social services used (accuracy and
relevance)
/3 marks
Decision and clear, coherent line of
argument/rationale
/3 marks
Quality, accuracy and relevance of professional
recommendation
/3 marks
APA referencing and formatting(including in-text
citations)
/3 marks
Formal case report writing style and structure /3 marks
Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation /2 marks
5-8 pages, double-spaced, 12” font Times New
Roman/Arial
/2 marks
Background of each party /2 marks
Theoretical application to each party /3marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each party /3 marks
Background of each community player
/2 marks
Theoretical application to each community player /3 marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each community
player
/3 marks
Community and social services used (accuracy and
relevance)
/3 marks
Decision and clear, coherent line of
argument/rationale
/3 marks
Quality, accuracy and relevance of professional
recommendation
/3 marks
APA referencing and formatting(including in-text
citations)
/3 marks
Formal case report writing style and structure /3 marks
Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation /2 marks
5-8 pages, double-spaced, 12” font Times New
Roman/Arial
/2 marks
Background of each party /2 marks
Theoretical application to each party /3marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each party /3 marks
Background of each community player
/2 marks
Theoretical application to each community player /3 marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each community
player
/3 marks
Community and social services used (accuracy and
relevance)
/3 marks
Decision and clear, coherent line of
argument/rationale
/3 marks
Quality, accuracy and relevance of professional
recommendation
/3 marks
APA referencing and formatting(including in-text
citations)
/3 marks
Formal case report writing style and structure /3 marks
Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation /2 marks
5-8 pages, double-spaced, 12” font Times New
Roman/Arial
/2 marks
Background of each party /2 marks
Theoretical application to each party /3marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each party /3 marks
Background of each community player
/2 marks
Theoretical application to each community player /3 marks
Goals, needs and assets, powers of each community
player
/3 marks
Community and social services used (accuracy and
relevance)
/3 marks
Decision and clear, coherent line of
argument/rationale
/3 marks
Quality, accuracy and relevance of professional
recommendation
/3 marks
APA referencing and formatting(including in-text
citations)
/3 marks
Formal case report writing style and structure /3 marks
Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, punctuation /2 marks
5-8 pages, double-spaced, 12” font Times New
Roman/Arial
/2 marks