CAPSTONE 3

profileMechy19
CAPSTONERUBRIC.pdf

MSN Capstone Project-DAX-DL01 Carmen Lazo Gradebook Final Capstone Project Part I, II, III

Final Capstone Project Part I, II, III

Submission

6. Discuss who will be invited to the proposal: who are the stakeholders? Be specific about why you chose the team and what each of their role will be. -How will you present the information to your stakeholders? Include cost and budget.

OVERALL: The conclusion should have your Part I, II, II all put together in a thorough APA format. -Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format  -Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years. -This section should be minimum 3-4 pages long (not including the title and reference page). -The final Capstone project should be a minimum of 8 pages. -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list. -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.  

Rubric Capstone Part III.pdf

▾ ▾ ▾ ▾ ▾ ▾ ▾ ▾

Word count: 0

Click to add text

Drag files here Maximum size: 512 MB

or

Upload a file Upload from cloud

Save and Close Submit

CRITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE Implementation of the practice change

20 Points

Thoroughly presented the change proposal. Included setting, time frame, population, stakeholders, Pros and cons/barriers.

20

Briefly presented the change proposal. Briefly Included setting, time frame, stakeholders. Pros and cons.

15

Vaguely presented the change proposal. Vaguely Included setting, time frame, stakeholders, Pros and cons.

10

Did not present the change proposal.

0

Change proposal was measured and realistic.

20 Points

Thoroughly used an appropriate measurement tool. Provided realistic outcomes. Discussed how it will be used and implemented.

20

Briefly used an appropriate measurement tool. Provided realistic outcomes.

15

Vaguely used an appropriate measurement tool. Provided realistic outcomes.

10

Did not use an appropriate measurement tool. Provided realistic outcomes.

0

Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness

20 Points

Thoroughly, In- depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Follows criteria provided in addition to leadership, management, budget and statistics.

20

Briefly, In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

15

Vaguely, In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

10

Did not use In- depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

0

Conclusion

25 Points

Thoroughly, Ties together information from all sources of Part I, II,III. Followed feedback and comments given from faculty.

25

Briefly, Ties together information from all sources of Part I, II,III

20

Vaguely, Ties together information from all sources of Part I, II,III

15

Does not Tie together information from all sources of Part I, II,III

0

Spelling and Grammar

5 points

Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors.

More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling,

More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors

An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.

Required word count has been met.

5

capitalization & punctuation errors Required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count.

4

Required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count.

3

Required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count.

0 Sources Over 5 current

sources, of which 5 current sources, of which at least 2

Fewer than 5 current sources or

Fewer than 5 current sources or

Page 1 of 2