CAPSTONE PART 3
1
Title
Student’s name
Instructor
Course
Date
2
Capstone Part II: Literature Review
Introduction
The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate whether the Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT), which is prescribed by computer-assisted and telemedicine-based systems, is
equally effective to improve depressive symptoms of Long-term care (LTC) patients or residents.
This review will enable an in-depth insight into the recent changes made in terms of the
outcomes, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and ethical questions of using CBT to treat depression
in this population. The proposed PICOT question is supported by the review: Among Older
Adults aged 65 and older living in long-terminal care facilities (P), does Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT) (I) compared to usual care or doing nothing (C) reduce symptoms of depression
(O)?
Literature review
Effectiveness of CBT in Reducing Depression Among Older Adults
CBT has been proven by various studies to be an effective psychotherapeutic
management of depression in the elderly. CBT interventions delivered in the residential setting
reported that participants receiving CBT in LTC facilities achieved a clinically significant
reduction of more than 58% in depressive symptoms in older adults. CBT interventions for
depression and anxiety are acceptable to Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) residents and
judged positively by staff members. The review was performed that included randomized
controlled trials (RCTs) and concluded that CBT, depending on the cognitive and physical
abilities of older adults, led to better mood, less negative thinking styles, and more coping
3
strategies. More recent evidence from SupportiveCare (2025) supports these findings, reporting
that 58% of participants receiving CBT in LTC facilities achieved a clinically significant
reduction in depressive symptoms compared with 27% in the usual-care group. According to
SupportiveCare (2025), “In a long-term study spanning 10 years, participants who received CBT
exhibited notably higher remission rates compared to control groups. Specifically, 58% of
individuals in the CBT group achieved remission across all diagnoses, with remission rates for
depression reaching 88% and anxiety at 63%. In contrast, the control group showed remission
rates of 27% for all diagnoses, 54% for depression, and 35% for anxiety”.
Equally similar, Morgado et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis type of studies focusing
on psychotherapeutic interventions to treatment of depressive signs and symptoms in aging
adults living under community care and concluded CBT showed roughly 15-30 percent
superiority in lowering depressive symptoms over usual care and the probability of being more
effective than control groups is at 73-83 percent among treatment recipients. Morgado et al.
(2024) found that, “Group and individual psychotherapeutic interventions reduce depressive
symptoms in community-dwelling older adults, with group psychotherapeutic interventions
being more effective”.
The structured and goal-oriented features of CBT are interestingly beneficial to the
elderly patient because they have practical suggestions to adopt in cognitive and emotional
requirements. Dafsari et al. (2024) compared CBT and supportive psychotherapy randomized
clinical trials studies in adults with late-life depression. It has been discovered that patients in
CBT received more improvement in depressive symptoms and perception of physical health as
compared to patients in supportive therapy. The authors state that “patients with high PPH at
4
baseline showed 12–14% greater reductions in depressive symptoms compared to SUI across
week 5, end of treatment, and 6-month follow-up”. These findings support the hypothesis that
CBT reduces depressive symptoms.
Synthesis and Relevance to the PICOT Question
Studies find that CBT, and internet-delivered CBT or embedded in collaborative care, can
decrease depression by large amounts at a minimal incremental cost, typically 2-5 dollars per
depression-free day or <5,100 per QALY with some models gaining net healthcare savings over
time. This implies that there is high potential of cost-effectiveness when implemented in the
setting of long-term care (Morgado et al. 2024). The evidence indicates that traditional and
telehealth-based CBT interventions demonstrate a great degree of improvement in the symptoms
of depression, preserve physical wellbeing, and can be economically sustainable. Such findings
are near those of the PICOT question.
The research by SupportiveCare, (2025), Morgado et al. (2024) and Dafsari et al. (2024)
combines high-quality empirical evidence of the usefulness of CBT in obtaining substantial
improvements in depression across the older adult population. In parallel, Ali et al. (2024) and
Witlox et al. (2022) indicate that the relatively cost-effective implementation of such
interventions is achievable, in particular through the application of telemedicine services. The
literature also reported that a 6-month implementation window suffices in detecting quantifiable
changes in depressive symptoms and therefore concurs with the duration in the PICOT. Besides
this, the articles studied herein provide an urgent need for proper screening along with ethical
service delivery and further discuss how the usage of CBT should be made in a conscientious,
competent, and continuous assessment type.
5
Evidence for my Practice Change
In their study, Witlox et al. (2022) compared Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
(ACT) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Although the Unified Protocol (UP) was
effective, evidence showed that the more cost-effective and applicable was CBT to be studied.
Notably, the study indicated the effectiveness of the telehealth-based ACT on the one hand and
CBT on the other, which implies the adaptability of distance-delivered therapies to geriatric
groups. This will promote the use of CBT through digital medium in LTC facilities, particularly
for persons with mobility or transport access obstructions. In their study, Ali et al. (2024) found
that computer-assisted modality substantiated the assumption that it ensures equal and even
better outcomes than are achieved by in-patient therapy, and costs are substantially lower.
Similarly, Shahsavar, & Choudhury, (2025), observed that CCBT can be a potentially
effective intervention that can be used in LTC facilities. The study's relevance lies in its strong
support for digital mental health interventions, which can be adapted for use in LTC facilities
with minimal investment in infrastructure. With many LTC facilities set up short on staffing and
physical capacity, telemedicine and computer-aided CBT (CCBT) appear to be potential
solutions to providing effective mental care.
Bell et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the
effectiveness of CBT based on telemedicine on the depression and anxiety of older adults. The
researchers found out that the telehealth approaches (videoconferencing and using the phone)
reduced the symptoms of depression similarly to face-to-face interventions.
Objectives for my Practice Change
6
Objective 1: Implement CBT to reduce depression in older adults residing in LTC
In order to achieve this, I will start by choosing a CBT protocol that is specifically
tailored to older adults and use age-appropriate language, examples, and pace. Depending on
residents and their needs, the intervention will either be provided in individual or small-group
sessions. I shall involve the mental health professionals to make sure that the therapy fits into the
clinical best practice and is operable within an LTC setting. There will be regular meetings to
facilitate compliance, and the progress will be observed utilizing the standardized depression
rating tools, which will enable timely changes to treatment plans.
Objective 2: Integrate telehealth and computer-assisted delivery models to expand access
I will leverage both telehealth platforms and computer-assisted CBT (CCBT) programs to
increase accessibility for residents with varying mobility and cognitive capacities. Tele-CBT will
encompass the deployment of licensed therapists to give moment-by-moment sessions through
stable video-conferencing, whereas CCBT modules will permit residents to access structured
therapeutic material at their convenience. A satisfactory technological infrastructure in the form
of tablets, headsets, and uninterrupted internet connectivity within the facility will back this dual
delivery method. Employees will help residents orient themselves with technology in order to
enjoy equal participation irrespective of their previous digital literacy.
Objective 3: Train LTC staff in basic CBT principles to support therapy efforts.
In order to maintain the practice change, I will create and implement the training of LTC
staff on the principles of CBT underlying practice, active listening techniques, and methods of
strengthening therapeutic principles in regular interactions. This will enable the employees to
detect issues regarding mood early, motivate residents to implement the techniques taught in
7
CBT, and act as an intermediary to formal therapy sessions. Refresher training and regular
check-ins at the supervising level would help maintain staff skills and confidence in mental
health support.
Objective 4: Establish standardized depression screening and referral protocols
In cooperation with the leadership at the facility, I plan to integrate depression screening
instruments that are evidence-based, and in this case, these are the Geriatric Depression Scale, to
be implemented periodically across the facility to all residents. The screening outcome will be
used to determine timely referrals to competent mental health professionals and proper enrolment
into CBT programs. Documentation processes and channels of communication will be clearly
defined, ensuring that all care team members are informed about mental health conditions and
the progress of residents.
Objective 5: Improve residents’ quality of life through evidence-based mental health care
The utmost goal is to ensure the enhancement of the emotional health status, social
interaction, and sense of purpose of the residents due to regular high-quality mental health
services. Incorporating CBT with the available delivery models, trained staff, and screening
patterns, the program will establish a positive therapeutic setting where caring about mental
health in LTC would be normal. The intervention should be responsive to the changing needs by
regularly assessing the performance outcomes of residents and through resident and staff input,
so that the intervention can attain a more favorable and fulfilling experience of living
environment on the part of older adults.
Where the Problem Exists, Why It Exists, and the Proposition for Change
8
Barriers and Facilitators to CBT in Long-Term Care
Although CBT proved to be a worthwhile measure in various environments, there are
certain issues with applying it to an LTC facility. The Atchison et al. (2023) study investigated
both the barriers and facilitators to anxiety management among LTC residents and revealed that
the following structural and systemic factors hindered the application of psychotherapeutic
measures among the majority of residents: staff workload, absence of mental health-specific
training, and stigma attached to mental health. Nonetheless, support factors including employee
education, family engagement, and flexible delivery models of therapy (e.g., group CBT or tele-
CBT) enhanced engagement and response.
Furthermore, Sen (2024) addressed the issue of organizational social work (OSW)
practices and defined a number of obstacles hindering the use of CBT, among which it is possible
to distinguish the lack of funds, available staff trained in CBT, and organizational predisposition
to rejecting any possible changes. Nonetheless, the study pointed out that the awareness activities
and institutional support to evidence-based practices were instrumental in raising the adoption
levels. These results are relevant in terms of approaching the question of how CBT could be
implemented in LTC institutions where the organizational culture and limited funding may
hamper innovations. Gerhards et al. (2025) took one step further and examined the extent to
which educational level in older adults determined the impacts of CBT. According to the authors,
the execution of CBT should be adapted to people who have different levels of health literacy
and cognitive abilities in LTC residents.
Current State of the Problem: Pros vs. Cons
9
The existing mental health care is a moderately prone and reactive system as compared to
an active one in LTC facilities. Among the advantages of using CBT, one may note high clinical
effectiveness, the possibility of digital treatment practice, and good patient compliance. As
demonstrated in the research by Bell et al. (2023) and Ali et al. (2024), telehealth CBT is
versatile and cost-effective, and this factor may play a critical role in an LTC facility.
Relevance, Feasibility, and Ethical Considerations
Cost-Effectiveness and Feasibility
Cost-effectiveness measures in healthcare are one of the principal factors to be
considered when planning interventions, especially in a poorly funded medical system like that
in LTC. According to Ali et al. (2024), CCBT combined with clinician support was proven to
enhance quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a modest incremental cost with an incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of approximately US $37,300 per QALY, and of roughly US
$3,623 per successful case of treatment-a cost-effective intervention with a willingness-to-pay of
US $50,000 per QALY. Its cost-effectiveness was also especially prominent among the older
adult population that normally takes significantly longer sessions of therapy because of comorbid
disorders and cognitive decline.
Witlox et al. (2022) used a randomized controlled trial, which compared the treatments of
CBT with ACT for older adults and measured their cost-utility ratios. CBT turned out to be the
less expensive treatment offering larger symptom decreases at the dollar cost. The authors came
to the conclusion that CBT should become a priority in environments where money is limited,
i.e., LTC facilities.
10
Bell et al. (2023) pointed out the economic and logistical viability of the telemedicine-
based CBT, as the mentioned model demands fewer resources in terms of staff and infrastructure
to implement compared to conventional models. It is especially beneficial to LTC facilities with
constant shortages of staff and patient-to-caregiver ratios that are too high. Therefore, even the
prerequisite of introducing CBT via telemedicine platforms can sound not only possible but also
rather sustainable over the long run.
Ethical Considerations and Screening Protocols
Ethical considerations need to be applied before any mental healthcare intervention, more
so when the population in question is vulnerable or in need, such as those staying in LTC.
Among them is the employment of appropriate screening instruments to select residents who are
good candidates for CBT.
Sen (2024) noted, the presence of organizational barriers might undermine the ethical
standards of using mental health interventions in case such practices are introduced without
training and support. The research advocated policies that would require the creation of
guidelines to be used by the institution regarding therapy that will incorporate regular screenings,
frequent reviews, and culturally relevant practices. This suggestion is consistent with the best
practice in mental health care and with the ethical practice of CBT in LTC facilities (Dafsari et
al. 2024).
Conclusion
The current literature review has supported that CBT is an effective, feasible, and
ethically correct intervention in the reduction of depressive symptoms among older adults living
in LTC facilities. The treatment, both on clinical and through a telehealth delivery and computer-
11
assisted interventions formats, has displayed similar success in various high-quality studies. The
implementation of CBT in LTC is both clinically supported and defensible with regard to the
notion of cost-effectiveness and ethical positioning point of view. The use of CBT can therefore
be taken very seriously as a mental health intervention in practice in long-term care settings in
line with the project's aims and scopes of the PICOT question.
12
References
Ali, S., Alemu, F. W., Owen, J., Eells, T. D., Antle, B., Lee, J. T., & Wright, J. H. (2024). Cost-
Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression
Among Adults in Primary Care. JAMA Network Open, 7(11), e2444599–e2444599.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44599
Atchison, K., Toohey, A. M., Ismail, Z., & Goodarzi, Z. (2023). Understanding the Barriers to
and Facilitators of Anxiety Management in Residents of Long-Term Care. Canadian
Journal on Aging =, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980823000417
Bell, P., Thayane Martins Dornelles, Natan Pereira Gosmann, & de, C. (2023). Efficacy of
telemedicine interventions for depression and anxiety in older people: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 38(5). https://
doi.org/10.1002/gps.5920
Dafsari, F. S., Bewernick, B., Böhringer, S., Domschke, K., Elsaesser, M., Margrit Löbner,
Luppa, M., Schmitt, S., Katja Wingenfeld, Wolf, E., Zehender, N., Hellmich, M., Wiebke
Müller, Wagner, M., Peters, O., Lutz Frölich, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Schramm, E.,
Hautzinger, M., & Jessen, F. (2024). Perceived Physical Health and Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy vs Supportive Psychotherapy Outcomes in Adults With Late-Life Depression.
JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e245841–e245841. https://doi.org/10.1001/
jamanetworkopen.2024.5841
13
Gerhards, S. K., Luppa, M., Zülke, A. E., Pabst, A., Claus, M., Bewernick, B., Elsaesser, M.,
Zehender, N., Wagner, M., Peters, O., Frölich, L., Schramm, E., Hautzinger, M., Jessen,
F., Dafsari, F. S., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2025). Educational attainment and cognitive
behavioral therapy treatment outcome in late-life depression: A secondary analysis of a
randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 380, 576–583. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.189
Morgado, B., Silva, C., Agostinho, I., Filipe Brás, Amaro, P., Lusquinhos, L., Silva, M. R.,
Fonseca, C., Núria Albacar-Riobóo, & Guedes, L. (2024). Psychotherapeutic
Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Healthcare, 12(24), 2551–2551. https://doi.org/
10.3390/healthcare12242551
sen, S. (2024). Exploring the Barriers to Use of CBT in OSW Practice in Organizations -
ProQuest. Proquest.com. https://www.proquest.com/openview/
a8933eb5e3237dff139f12b9d87ed441/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Shahsavar, Y., & Choudhury, A. (2025). Effectiveness of evidence based mental health apps on
user health outcome: A systematic literature review. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0319983. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319983
SupportiveCare. (2025). Evaluating the Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Senior
Residents - Supportive Care. Thesupportivecare.com. https://
www.thesupportivecare.com/blog/evaluating-the-efficacy-of-cognitive-behavioral-
therapy-for-senior-residents.
14
Witlox, M., Kraaij, V., Garnefski, N., Bohlmeijer, E., Smit, F., & Spinhoven, P. (2022). Cost-
effectiveness and cost-utility of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention vs.
a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy intervention for older adults with anxiety symptoms: A
randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262220. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0262220