Capstone Integrative Project Final Solution Assessment

3/15/2021 Capstone Integrative Project Final Solution Assessment Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/HMSV/HMSV5993/190400/Scoring_Guides/u10a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2

Capstone Integrative Project Final Solution Assessment Scoring Guide

Due Date: Unit 10 Percentage of Course Grade: 15%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Revise an analysis of a chosen human services problem for a selected organization.

16%

Does not revise an analysis of a chosen human services problem for a selected organization.

Revises previous work, but an analysis of a chosen human services problem for a selected organization lacks substance.

Revises an analysis of a chosen human services problem for a selected organization.

Revises an analysis of a chosen human services problem for a selected organization and discusses how further investigation deepened the analysis.

Explain, using peer- reviewed literature, the achievements and challenges of a selected human services organization in addressing a chosen human services problem.

14%

Does not explain, using peer- reviewed literature, the achievements and challenges of a selected human services organization in addressing a chosen human services problem.

Describes a chosen human services organization or problem without substantiating its achievements and challenges, or does not ground the findings using peer- reviewed literature.

Explains, using peer-reviewed literature, the achievements and challenges of a selected human services organization in addressing a chosen human services problem.

Validates, using peer- reviewed literature, the achievements and challenges of a selected human services organization in addressing a chosen human services problem, and compares the problem to similar problems in the field.

Explain cultural, diversity, and ethical considerations for a chosen human services problem.

14%

Does not explain cultural, diversity, and ethical considerations for a chosen human services problem.

Describes a chosen human services problem but does not incorporate the perspective of culture, diversity, or ethical considerations.

Explains cultural, diversity, and ethical considerations for a chosen human services problem.

Synthesizes cultural, diversity, and ethical considerations for a chosen human services problem.

Explain theoretical frameworks that are relevant to a chosen human services problem.

14%

Does not explain theoretical frameworks that are relevant to a chosen human services problem.

Describes frameworks for a chosen human services problem that may not be relevant or based in scholarly literature.

Explains theoretical frameworks that are relevant to a chosen human services problem.

Explains theoretical frameworks that are relevant to a chosen human services problem and impartially considers conflicting evidence and/or other perspectives.

Develop specific, relevant recommendations for improvement of a chosen human services problem in a selected organization.

14%

Does not develop specific, relevant recommendations for improvement of a chosen human services problem in a selected organization.

Proposes recommendations that may not be relevant or specific, or may not improve a chosen human services problem in a selected organization.

Develops specific, relevant recommendations for improvement of a chosen human services problem in a selected organization.

Develops specific, relevant recommendations for improvement of a chosen human services problem in a selected organization, and impartially explains the pros and cons of the recommendations.

3/15/2021 Capstone Integrative Project Final Solution Assessment Scoring Guide

https://courseroomc.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/HMSV/HMSV5993/190400/Scoring_Guides/u10a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Propose recommendations for advocacy and collaboration with other organizations on a chosen human services issue.

14%

Does not propose recommendations for advocacy and collaboration with other organizations on a chosen human services issue.

Proposes recommendations that may not be applicable or pertinent for advocacy or collaboration with other organizations on a chosen human services issue.

Proposes recommendations for advocacy and collaboration with other organizations on a chosen human services issue.

Proposes recommendations for advocacy and collaboration with other organizations on a chosen human services issue, and explains how the recommendations will affect change.

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the expectations for members of the human services profession.

14%

Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates inconsistently, with errors, unclearly, or without respect for the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others; therefore, does not meet the expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the expectations for members of the human services profession.

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with the expectations for members of the human services profession, and provides a logical presentation of claims that add value to the topic and are validated by research.