Discussion Thread: Parable of the Talents

profileSerenity3203
CAPMandAPT1.pptx

CAPM and APT

Bodie, Kane, and Marcus

Essentials of Investments Eleventh Edition

7

Chapter

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Security’s required rate of return relates to systematic risk measured by beta

Market Portfolio (M)

Each security held in proportion to market value

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Assumptions

Market Assumptions Investor Assumptions
All investors are price takers Investors plan for the same (single-period) horizon
All information relevant to security analysis is free and publicly available. Investors are efficient users of analytical methods  investors have homogeneous expectations.
All securities are publicly owned and traded. Investors are rational, mean-variance optimizers.
No taxes on investment returns.
No transaction costs.
Lending and borrowing at the same risk-free rate are unlimited.

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Hypothetical Equilibrium

All investors choose to hold market portfolio

Market portfolio is on efficient frontier, optimal risky portfolio

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Hypothetical Equilibrium

Risk premium on market portfolio is proportional to variance of market portfolio and investor’s risk aversion

Risk premium on individual assets

Proportional to risk premium on market portfolio

Proportional to beta coefficient of security on market portfolio

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Figure 7.1 Efficient Frontier and Capital Market Line

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Passive Strategy is Efficient

Mutual fund theorem: All investors desire same portfolio of risky assets, can be satisfied by single mutual fund composed of that portfolio

If passive strategy is costless and efficient, why follow active strategy?

If no one does security analysis, what brings about efficiency of market portfolio?

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Risk Premium of Market Portfolio

Demand drives prices, lowers expected rate of return/risk premiums

When premiums fall, investors move funds into risk-free asset

Equilibrium risk premium of market portfolio proportional to

Risk of market

Risk aversion of average investor

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Expected Returns on Individual Securities

Expected return-beta relationship

Implication of CAPM that security risk premiums (expected excess returns) will be proportional to beta

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

The Security Market Line (SML)

Represents expected return-beta relationship of CAPM

Graphs individual asset risk premiums as function of asset risk

Alpha

Abnormal rate of return on security in excess of that predicted by equilibrium model (CAPM)

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Figure 7.2 The SML and a Positive-Alpha Stock

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model

Applications of CAPM

Use SML as benchmark for fair return on risky asset

SML provides “hurdle rate” for internal projects

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.2 CAPM and Index Models

Index Model, Realized Returns, Mean-Beta Equation

: HPR

i: Asset

t: Period

: Intercept of security characteristic line

: Slope of security characteristic line

: Index return

: Firm-specific effects

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.2 CAPM and Index Models

Estimating Index Model

, excess return

Residual = Actual return Predicted return for Google

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.2 CAPM and Index Models: SCL

Security Characteristic Line (SCL)

Plot of security’s expected excess return over risk-free rate as function of excess return on market

Required rate = Risk-free rate + β x Expected excess return of index

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.2 CAPM and Index Models

Predicting Betas

Mean reversion

Betas move towards mean over time

To predict future betas, adjust estimates from historical data to account for regression towards 1.0

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.3 CAPM and the Real World

CAPM is false based on validity of its assumptions

Useful predictor of expected returns

Untestable as a theory

Principles still valid

Investors should diversify

Systematic risk is the risk that matters

Well-diversified risky portfolio can be suitable for wide range of investors

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.4 Multifactor Models and CAPM

Multifactor models

Models of security returns that respond to several systematic factors

Two-index portfolio in realized returns

Two-factor SML

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.4 Multifactor Models and CAPM

Fama-French Three-Factor Model

Estimation results

Three aspects of successful specification

Higher adjusted R-square

Lower residual SD

Smaller value of alpha

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Table 7.2 Multifactor Models and CAPM

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.5 Arbitrage Pricing Theory

Arbitrage

Relative mispricing creates riskless profit

Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)

Risk-return relationships from no-arbitrage considerations in large capital markets

Well-diversified portfolio

Nonsystematic risk is negligible

Arbitrage portfolio

Positive return, zero-net-investment, risk-free portfolio

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.5 Arbitrage Pricing Theory

Calculating APT

Returns on well-diversified portfolio

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Table 7.5 Portfolio Conversion

*When alpha is negative, you would reverse the signs of each portfolio weight to achieve a portfolio A with positive alpha and no net investment.

Steps to convert a well-diversified portfolio into an arbitrage portfolio:

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Figure 7.5 Security Characteristic Lines

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

7.5 Arbitrage Pricing Theory

Multifactor Generalization of APT and CAPM

Factor portfolio

Well-diversified portfolio constructed to have beta of 1.0 on one factor and beta of zero on any other factor

Two-Factor Model for APT

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Table 7.9 Constructing an Arbitrage Portfolio

Constructing an arbitrage portfolio with two systemic factors

‹#›

Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

image2.png

image3.png

image4.png

image5.png

image6.png

image7.png

image10.png

image11.png

image8.png

image9.png

image12.png

image13.png

image14.png

image15.png

image16.png

image17.png