Develop an 8 page proposal

profileIgotthis824
CapellaUniversityScoringGuideTool4.pdf

MHA-FPX5016 u04a1 - Health Information Improvement Proposal Learner: Elizabeth , Foster

OVERALL COMMENTS Elizabeth,

Thank you for your beginning work on assessment 4. Your paper is well written and organized but there is room for

improvement in addressing rubrics criteria 5. Please see the scoring guide for specific comments to help guide your

revisions. Be sure to highlight any changes.

Dr McGuire

RUBRICS

CRITERIA 1

Explain recommendations related to technological and logistical changes to an organization's health information management system.

COMPETENCY

Analyze administrative, clinical, management, and decision-support information technology tools. (L12.1, 12.2,

14.3)

NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not describe changes to a health information management system.

BASIC:

Describes changes to a health information management system, but fails to full explain how the changes

reflect recommendations related to technology or logistic within an organization.

PROFICIENT:

Explains recommendations related to technological and logistical changes to an organizations health

information management system.

DISTINGUISHED:

Explains recommendations related to technological and logistical changes to an organizations health

information management system; also, identifies potential challenges to implementing recommendations.

Comments:

You did a good job recommending changes including implementation of an upgraded EHR to allow for

automated tasks such as ePrescribing, electronic clinical documentation, and analysis of data.

CRITERIA 2

Explain how data products and outcomes from recommendations align with an organization's administrative and clinical goals.

COMPETENCY

Analyze administrative, clinical, management, and decision-support information technology tools. (L12.1, 12.2,

14.3)

NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not describe data products and outcomes from recommendations.

BASIC:

Describes data products and outcomes from recommendations, but fails to align them an organization's

administrative and clinical goals.

PROFICIENT:

Explains how data products and outcomes from recommendations align with an organization's administrative

and clinical goals.

DISTINGUISHED:

Explains how data products and outcomes from recommendations align with an organization's

administrative and clinical goals and proposes criteria that could be used to evaluate how well

recommendations contribute towards organizational goals.

Comments:

You did a great job describing the EHR and data that can be used to improve patient care outcomes while

also maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.

CRITERIA 3

Analyze how contemporary data analysis trends could be leveraged to improve current practices in an organization.

COMPETENCY

Apply emerging models or best practices to implement a health information system that improves operations

and patient outcomes. (L8.4, L12.2, L14.3)

NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not explain contemporary data analysis trends.

BASIC:

Explains contemporary data analysis trends, but fails to fully analyze these trends or the explanation fails to

fully address how these trends could be leveraged to improve current practices in an organization.

PROFICIENT:

Analyzes how contemporary data analysis trends could be leveraged to improve current practices in an

organization.

DISTINGUISHED:

Analyzes how contemporary data analysis trends could be leveraged to improve current practices in an

organization. Identifies processes that could be implemented to ensure continuous improvement.

Comments:

You did a great job describing data analysis trends including use of apps and other cloud-based technology to

monitor performance data and aid in decision making.

CRITERIA 4

Recommend best practices for collecting data, securely storing data and converting data analytics into useful and understandable deliverables.

COMPETENCY

Apply emerging models or best practices to implement a health information system that improves operations

and patient outcomes. (L8.4, L12.2, L14.3)

NON_PERFORMANCE:

Does not explain best practices for collecting data, securely storing data and converting data analytics.

BASIC:

Explains best practices for collecting data, securely storing data and converting data analytics, but fails to

connect these best practices to useful and understandable deliverables.

PROFICIENT:

Recommends best practices for collecting data, securely storing data and converting data analytics into

useful and understandable deliverables.

DISTINGUISHED:

Recommends best practices for collecting data, securely storing data and converting data analytics into

useful and understandable deliverables. Identifies specific processes to ensure that recommendations can

be sustainably performed.

Comments:

You provided excellent recommendations including use of a standardized approach to data collection and

safeguarding of protected health information.

CRITERIA 5

Apply relevant evidence and best practices to target proposal messaging to stakeholders.

COMPETENCY

Apply evidence to influence buy-in from all stakeholders. (L10.5)

NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not explain best practices and evidence for communicating a proposal.

BASIC:

Explains best practices and evidence for communicating a proposal, but fails to effectively target the

messaging to relevant stakeholders.

PROFICIENT: Applies relevant evidence and best practices to target proposal messaging to stakeholders.

DISTINGUISHED:

Applies relevant evidence and best practices to target proposal messaging to stakeholders. Identifies

challenges in persuading all relevant stakeholders.

Comments:

Please describe strategies that work best to obtain stakeholder buy-in for necessary changes.

CRITERIA 6

Communicate proposal in a professional, clear, and concise way.

COMPETENCY

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in

health care administration. (L6.1, L6.2, L6.3, and L6.4)

NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not communicate proposal.

BASIC:

Communicates proposal, but the approach is somewhat unclear, or there are mechanical writing errors that

reduce the effectiveness of communication.

PROFICIENT: Communicates proposal in a professional, clear, and concise way.

DISTINGUISHED:

Communicates proposal in a professional, clear, and concise way; the written content is mechanically

accurate with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Comments:

Your paper is well written, organized, professional, and evidence-based.

Supplemental Feedback

CRITERIA 7

Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

COMPETENCY

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in

health care administration. (L6.1, L6.2, L6.3, and L6.4)

NON_PERFORMANCE:

Does not integrate relevant sources to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references

using current APA style.

BASIC: Sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated, or citations or references are incorrectly formatted.

PROFICIENT:

Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current

APA style.

DISTINGUISHED:

Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using

current APA style, which are free from all errors.

Comments:

Your paper appears to follow APA guidelines for format and style.

SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 1

Purpose Compose a text that articulates meaning relevant to the main topic, scope, and purpose of the prompt

BEGINNING: This text is unrelated to the assignment prompt.

DEVELOPING:

This text is related to the assignment prompt but does not demonstrate an understanding of the main topic,

scope, and purpose.

SKILLED:

This text responds to the assignment prompt and appropriately addresses the main topic, scope, and

purpose.

ADVANCED:

This text presents a focused response to the assignment prompt and demonstrates a thorough

understanding of the main topic, scope, and purpose.

Comments:

SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 2

Organization Develop text using organization, structure, and transitions that demonstrate understanding of relationship between main and subtopics

BEGINNING:

This text does not include a thesis statement and is organized inappropriately for the assignment.

DEVELOPING:

The thesis statement in this text is unclear and/or the text is presented in paragraphs with unclear main

idea(s) and/or transitional phrases.

SKILLED:

This text includes a thesis statement and is organized into paragraphs, with clear main ideas and effective

transitional phrases.

ADVANCED:

This text reflects a strong thesis statement. Additionally, this text is organized with skillful transitions into

paragraphs with clear main ideas, sufficient evidence, analysis, and linking information.

Comments:

SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 3

Evidence Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources and evidence

BEGINNING: This text included plagiarized information.

DEVELOPING:

This text lacks synthesis of information from sources and/or the credibility of the sources is questionable,

with many flaws in APA citation style.

SKILLED:

The included evidence was integrated and synthesized from outside sources, most of which are scholarly,

with minimal flaws in APA citation style.

ADVANCED:

The evidence in this text was integrated and synthesized from credible, scholarly, and professionally sound

sources, with minimal flaws in APA citation style.

Comments:

SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 4

Tone Apply in text the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person and tone

BEGINNING: Text uses language inappropriate for the intended audience.

DEVELOPING:

This text does not meet writing conventions for the discipline and lacks appropriate voice, person, and/or

tone for the intended audience.

SKILLED:

This text meets writing conventions for the discipline and there were minimal issues in appropriate use of

voice, person, or tone for the intended audience.

ADVANCED:

This text exhibits strict adherence to writing conventions for the discipline and uses appropriate voice,

person, and tone for the intended audience.

Comments:

SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA 5

Sentence Structure Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors

BEGINNING:

Text meaning is unclear due to errors in sentence structure, grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or

mechanics in 75% or more of text.

DEVELOPING:

Text meaning is interrupted due to sentence structure, grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical

errors in 25%-75% or more of text.

SKILLED:

Text conveys clear meaning with minimal issues in grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical

errors in 10%-25% of text.

ADVANCED:

Text complexity and concision conveys clear meaning, with grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or

mechanical errors in 10% or less of text.

Comments: