16 paragraph needed ( 125-150 words ok) due by 35 hours
1_Send_canagliflozin.docx
Max 3-4 pages, do not skip each question, each bullet !!
canagliflozin
Please obtain from the web the 2010 paper by Nomura et al. on the discovery of canagliflozin.
· The title is: “Discovery of Canagliflozin, a Novel C-Glucoside with Thiophene Ring, as Sodium-Dependent Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus”.
· Also download the Supplemental Information
You may need to get additional information from Google, Wikipedia, or PubMed
Prepare a short summary of the properties of canagliflozin:
· Compound number on the paper, MW, and structure
· Originator and marketing companies (Wiki)
· Explain (one bullet) how the in vitro assays at SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 were performed
· Potency and selectivity at the relevant transporters in vitro
· Relevant PK parameters
· Pharmacodynamic effects in mice (do not forget to indicate doses and route of administration)
· Explain why the authors used “KK mice” (one bullet)
· Summary evaluation of the compound and its status in 2010
Please retrieve the 2014 paper by Mamidi et al. on the metabolism of canagliflozin.
· Provided
Prepare a short summary:
· Title, authors, company, and citation (can copy/paste from pdf)
· Proposed in vivo metabolic pathways for canagliflozin in mice, rats, dogs, and humans
· Indicate on the above scheme the metabolites find in humans
· Add to the above scheme the CYPs and UGTs responsible for each metabolite found in humans (Hint: read the Discussion)
· Graph of PK of canagliflozin and metabolites in humans
· Which is the primary biotransformation pathway of canagliflozin in humans?
· What are the main differences in metabolism and excretion between animals and humans?
· Are the main metabolites in humans biologically active?
· Why wasn’t it necessary to test the non-clinical safety of the main human metabolites?
Please retrieve the 2013 paper by F. J. Lavalle-González et al. on a clinical trial with canagliflozin in T2D
· Provided
Prepare and describing details and results of the trial as suggested below.
This should be very easy for the students by now!
· Copy/paste the title portion of the paper with title, authors, citation, and also the addresses of all the authors
· We want to know who they are and where they work
· Go to ClinicalTrials.gov and find the trial using its NCT number. Navigate to the “Tabular View” tab, which is easier to read. On your slide provide the following information (Try to copy/paste as much as possible):
· NCT number
· Brief Title
· Official Title
· Responsible Party
· Study Sponsor
· Study Director
· Listed Location Countries (we want to have an idea of the quality of the study sites…)
· Eligibility Criteria
· Sex/Gender
· Ages
· Go back to the Lavalle-González publication
· On your presentation, create a diagram of your own design indicating:
· The phases of the study
· The four arms of the study and interventions applied
· List briefly the primary end point of the study
· List briefly the secondary end points of the study
· State the biological activity of the active comparator
· Show the graphs with change in HbA1C and mean values of HbA1C.
· Do not uses the confusing legend. Manage to indicate which line is which in any way you like
· Show the graph with % body weight change
· Show the results at week 52 for:
· HbA1C, FPG, and body weight
· Show the table of side effects
· Comment on the frequency of hypoglycemia, UTIs, and osmotic diuresis
· Comment on changes in eGFR
·
1_2014_Metabolism and Excretion of Canagliflozin in Mice.pdf
1521-009X/42/5/903–916$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.113.056440 DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION Drug Metab Dispos 42:903–916, May 2014 Copyright ª 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Metabolism and Excretion of Canagliflozin in Mice, Rats, Dogs, and Humanss
Rao N. V. S. Mamidi, Filip Cuyckens, Jie Chen, Ellen Scheers, Dennis Kalamaridis, Ronghui Lin, Jose Silva, Sue Sha, David C. Evans, Michael F. Kelley, Damayanthi Devineni, Mark D. Johnson,
and Heng Keang Lim
Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, New Jersey (R.N.V.S.M., S.S., D.D., M.D.J.), Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania (J.C., D.K., R.L., J.S., D.C.E., M.F.K., H.K.L.), and Janssen Research & Development, a division
of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium (F.C., E.S.)
Received December 11, 2013; accepted February 25, 2014
ABSTRACT
Canagliflozin is an oral antihyperglycemic agent used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It blocks the reabsorption of glucose in the proximal renal tubule by inhibiting the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2. This article describes the in vivo biotransfor- mation and disposition of canagliflozin after a single oral dose of [14C]canagliflozin to intact and bile duct-cannulated (BDC) mice and rats and to intact dogs and humans. Fecal excretion was the primary route of elimination of drug-derived radioactivity in both animals and humans. In BDC mice and rats, most radioactivity was excreted in bile. The extent of radioactivity excreted in urine as a percentage of the administered [14C]canagliflozin dose was 1.2%– 7.6% in animals and approximately 33% in humans. The primary pathways contributing to the metabolic clearance of canagliflozin
were oxidation in animals and direct glucuronidation of canagli- flozin in humans. Unchanged canagliflozin was the major compo- nent in systemic circulation in all species. In human plasma, two pharmacologically inactive O-glucuronide conjugates of canagli- flozin, M5 and M7, represented 19% and 14% of total drug-related exposure and were considered major human metabolites. Plasma concentrations of M5 and M7 in mice and rats from repeated dose safety studies were lower than those in humans given canagliflozin at the maximum recommended dose of 300 mg. However, biliary metabolite profiling in rodents indicated that mouse and rat livers had significant exposure to M5 and M7. Pharmacologic inactivity and high water solubility of M5 and M7 support glucuronidation of canagliflozin as a safe detoxification pathway.
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a chronic disease with worldwide prevalence (Chen et al., 2012), is characterized by hyperglycemia caused by excessive hepatic glucose production, a deficiency in insulin secretion, and/or peripheral insulin resistance. Drugs for T2DM act by increasing insulin levels, enhancing insulin sensitivity, or reducing glucose absorption. Despite an armamentarium of agents with antihyperglycemic efficacy in T2DM, only 50% of patients achieve the glycemic treatment goals set forth by expert societies (Stark Casagrande et al., 2013). Thus, there is a need to develop new agents with novel mechanisms of action to control glucose levels in patients with T2DM. The most desirable drugs would improve glycemic control with little or no risk of hypoglycemia, promote weight loss, and improve pancreatic b-cell function. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) is expressed primarily in
the early proximal renal tubule and is responsible for most of the glucose reabsorption in the kidney (Wright et al., 2007). Inhibition of SGLT2 decreases glucose reabsorption in the renal tubule and increases glucose excretion (Hardman and Dubrey, 2011). Partitioning of glucose out of the body through increased urinary glucose excretion directly
reduces elevated blood glucose concentrations. As a result of urinary caloric loss secondary to glucose excretion, body weight neutrality or weight loss is expected with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment. Canagliflozin [CAS 842133-18-0, (1S)-1,5-anhydro-1-[3-[[5-(4-
fluorophenyl)-2-thienyl] methyl]-4-methylphenyl]-D-glucitol], a new oral antihyperglycemic agent and a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, has been shown to reduce the renal threshold for glucose reabsorption, increase urinary glucose excretion, reduce plasma glucose, and promote weight loss in preclinical and clinical studies (Nomura et al., 2010; Sha et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2012; Rosenstock et al., 2012; Devineni et al., 2013). The objective of the present study was to determine the metabolism
and excretion of canagliflozin in preclinical species (mice, rats, and dogs) and humans after a single oral dose of [14C]canagliflozin. Major and minor metabolites were quantified in plasma, in urine and feces, and in mouse and rat bile. Information generated from these studies was used to support the nonclinical safety evaluation of canagliflozin.
Materials and Methods
Test Article
Canagliflozin, specifically labeled with 14C at the methylene carbon (Fig. 1), was synthesized by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (Spring House, PA). The 14C label at this position is metabolically stable, as evidenced by the
dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.113.056440. s This article has supplemental material available at dmd.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: AUC, area under the plasma concentration-time curve; BDC, bile duct-cannulated; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LSC, liquid scintillation counting; MS, mass spectrometry; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; RDB, rings plus double bonds; SGLT2, sodium glucose cotransporter 2; Sv, Sievert; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; Tmax, time to reach the maximum plasma concentration; TR, total radioactivity; UHPLC, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography.
903
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/suppl/2014/02/25/dmd.113.056440.DC1 Supplemental material to this article can be found at:
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
lack of 14CO2 exhalation in the rat after oral dosing of [ 14C]canagliflozin. The
stock solution of [14C]canagliflozin had a specific activity of 2.0 GBq/mmol (4.5 MBq/mg) and a radiochemical purity of 99.8%. Dosing formulations were prepared by combining appropriate amounts of radiolabeled and unlabeled canagliflozin to meet the target specific activity. Radiochemical purities of [14C]canagliflozin in study formulations ranged between 97.2% and 99.8%. Metabolite reference standards were synthesized at Janssen Pharmaceutical Research & Development.
Animal Experiments
All animal experiments were conducted according to the standards recommended by the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, 1996), and protocols were approved by the Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Animal Care and Use Committee. All animals were treated with a single dose of [14C]canagliflozin followed by collection of plasma, urine, and feces at predefined intervals (see individual studies in the following sections). Mass balance of total radioactivity (TR) for excreta was determined by summing radioactivity in samples for the entire collection period, plus radioactivity in cage debris and cage washings obtained at terminal sample times. Biliary excretion studies were conducted in bile-duct cannulated (BDC) mice and rats.
Intact Mouse Study. Male and female Swiss SPF Albino (CD1) mice obtained from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Sulzfeld, Germany) were divided into two groups. Group A animals were used for generating plasma metabolite profiles and were housed by sex in grid-bottomed polypropylene cages (n = 40/ sex; 10 per cage). Those in group B were used for the metabolism-excretion balance study and were placed in glass metabolism cages (n = 16/sex; four per cage). A suspension of [14C]canagliflozin in 0.5% hypromellose with a specific activity of 22.2 kBq/mg was given by oral gavage to 5-week old mice at 100 mg/kg (2.2 MBq/kg). After the dose, plasma samples were collected from group A animals (n = 10/sampling time/sex) at 1, 4, 7, and 24 hours, and for group B animals, urine was collected at defined intervals of 0–7, 7–24, 24–48, 48–72, and 72–96 hours, and feces were collected every 24 hour sfor 4 days. All samples were stored at 220°C until analysis.
Intact Rat Study. Sprague-Dawley rats of either sex were obtained from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA) at approximately 8–10 weeks of age and were divided into two groups. Group A animals were used for generating plasma metabolite profiles and were housed by sex in plastic cages (n = 10/sex; 2 per cage), and group B animals, used for mass balance and metabolic profiling, were placed in metabolic cages (treated, n = 4/sex, one per cage; vehicle control n = 1/sex). [14C]Canagliflozin was formulated as a suspension in 0.5% hypromellose with a specific activity of 1.5 MBq/mg. The rats were given an oral gavage dose of 3 mg/kg (approximately 4.6 MBq/kg). After dose administration, plasma samples were collected from group A animals (n = 2/sampling time/sex) at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours. For group B animals, urine was collected during intervals of 0–4, 4–8, 8–24, 24–48, 48–72, 72–96 and 96–120 hours, and feces were collected daily for 5 days. All samples were stored at 220°C until analysis.
Intact Dog Study. [14C]Canagliflozin was formulated as a 0.5% hypromel- lose suspension at a specific activity of 103 kBq/mg. After an acclimatization period, three male dogs obtained from Covance (Cumberland, VA) received an oral gavage dose of [14C]canagliflozin at 4 mg/kg (approximately 0.4 MBq/kg).
Postdose sample collections were obtained at 0.5, 1, 4, 8, 24, 72, and 96 hours for plasma, at several intervals between 0 and 144 hours for urine and on 6 consecutive days for feces. All samples were stored at 220°C until analysis.
BDC Mouse Study. Biliary excretion of radioactivity and canagliflozin metabolites in bile were studied in BDC male CD-1 mice obtained from Charles River, Inc. (Raleigh, NC) at approximately 8–10 weeks of age. Five BDC mice (weighing ;30 g) were housed individually in plastic metabolism cages. Mice fasted overnight received [14C]canagliflozin as a 0.5% hypro- mellose suspension with a specific activity of 62 kBq/mg. After a single oral gavage dose of 100 mg/kg (approximately 6.16 MBq/kg), the mice were afforded unlimited access to food and water. Bile was collected at intervals of 0–4, 4–8, or 8–24 hours after the dose. A single pool for each time interval was prepared by mixing common fractions from each mouse. A 0- to 24-hour bile pool was created for each mouse by proportional pooling of samples from the three single time-interval pools. Feces were not collected in this study. All bile samples were stored at 220°C until analysis.
BDC Rat Study. Biliary excretion of canagliflozin and its metabolites was investigated in BDC male Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Horst, The Netherlands) at approximately 9–11 weeks of age. BDC rats were individually housed in plastic metabolism cages. A single oral dose of [14C]canagliflozin, formulated as a 0.5% hypromellose suspension with a specific activity of 493 kBq/mg, was administered to four rats by oral gavage at a dose level of 3 mg/kg (1.48 MBq/kg). During sample collection, bile salts were replenished with a solution of 0.5% (w/v) sodium taurocholate in 0.9% NaCl infused at 0.6 ml/h via the duodenal catheter. After dose administration, bile was collected at intervals of 0–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–16, and 16–24 hours, and urine and feces were collected over a 0- to 24-hour period. Single bile pools for each time interval were created by proportional mixing of samples from each rat. All samples were stored at 220°C until analysis. Representative rat bile samples (0- to 8-hour intervals after dose) were incubated in vitro with b-glucuronidase/ arylsulfatase from Helix pomatia (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) to facilitate identification of glucuronide conjugates of canagliflozin and/or its metabolites. Enzyme-treated and -untreated bile samples were analyzed by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with radioactivity detection. Mono-oxygenated and O-glucuronide metabolites of canagliflozin were identified from product ion spectra generated by an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Human Study
The metabolism and excretion of canagliflozin were conducted as a single- dose, single-center, open-label study in healthy adult males. The protocol of the clinical trial was approved by an internal review committee and an independent ethics committee, and the trial was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. Six healthy male subjects with the following profile participated in the study: age 19–45 years; body mass index 18–26 kg/m2, body weight 62–87 kg, and good health based on medical history. All subjects gave their full informed consent before the start of the study.
A target radioactivity level of 1480 kBq (or 40 mCi) for the intended [14C]canagliflozin dose was considered sufficient to accurately detect and study canagliflozin metabolism. Human radiation exposure from 1480 kBq of internal 14C was estimated to be less than 1 mSv. These dosimetry calculations were derived from tissue distribution of total radioactivity in a single-dose [14C]canagliflozin study in male Long-Evans rats and from [14C]canagliflozin excretion-mass balance data in rats and dogs. Radiation doses between 100 and 1000 mSv are classified as category IIa, defined as a minor level of risk to the subject (Verbruggen et al., 2008).
Subjects were admitted to the investigator’s facility on day 21 and fasted overnight for at least 8 hours. [14C]Canagliflozin was formulated as a 0.5% hypromellose suspension with a specific activity of 7.72 kBq/mg. On day 1, each subject received a single 188 mg of [14C]canagliflozin dose by orally consuming 4 ml of formulation containing approximately 1451 kBq (39.2 mCi) of radioactivity. Subjects then drank the water (approximately 240 ml) used to rinse drug residue from the medication bottle. Standardized lunch and dinner were provided approximately 4 hours and 10 hours after drug administration, and a snack was allowed in the evening throughout the confinement period. After dose administration, blood samples were obtained at 1.5, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Fig. 1. Structure of [14C]canagliflozin with position of 14C label (*)
904 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
hours; urine was collected at intervals of 0–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–24, 24–48, 48–72, 72–96, 96–120, 120–144, and 144–168 hours; and feces (per stool) were collected every 24 hours through day 8. For subjects who had to extend their residency in the study unit, feces were collected for each 24-hour interval. Plasma, urine, and feces were kept at 220°C until sample analysis.
Analysis of Radioactivity
Radioactivity in plasma, urine, and bile samples from animal studies was quantified by liquid scintillation counting (LSC) using a Packard 3100TR liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT). Aliquots of plasma (0.2 ml), urine (0.2 ml), and bile (0.05 ml) were mixed with 15 ml of Ultima Gold scintillation fluid (PerkinElmer) and analyzed directly by LSC. Feces from animals and humans were processed as described in the following sections, and samples were subsequently combusted in a Packard sample oxidizer (A307). Rat and dog fecal samples were homogenized in methanol/water (50/50, v/v), and aliquots were added directly to the sample oxidizer. Mouse and human feces samples were homogenized in methanol followed by centrifugation of the suspension. Residues were extracted twice more with methanol. Residues were suspended in methanol and then recovered by filtration through a Buchner funnel. Radioactivity levels in methanol retained during residue extractions were determined by LSC. Fecal residues were air-dried and then ground to a fine powder in an Ultra Centrifugal Mill ZM100 (Resch GmBH, Haan, Germany). Four weighed portions of each residue sample were placed in the sample oxidizer. Liberated 14CO2 was captured with Carbo-Sorb E (Packard), Permafluor scintillation cocktail was then added, and radioactivity was quantified using a Packard 2900TR or 3100TR liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer). Rat and dog feces homogenates and methanol fractions from mouse and human fecal extractions were stored at 220°C until analysis.
Preparation of Biologic Samples for Metabolite Profiling
When appropriate, individual or overall pools of urine, bile, or methanolic fecal extracts were prepared by mixing constant fractions of individual samples or individual pools, respectively. Overall plasma pools were prepared by mixing equal volumes of individual samples. For plasma and urine samples, protein was precipitated with 6 volumes of acetonitrile. Methanol from mouse and human fecal extractions was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen at room temperature before protein precipitation with 6 volumes of acetonitrile containing 0.01% formic acid. Protein in 2 g portions of rat and dog feces homogenates was precipitated with 4–6 volumes of acetonitrile containing 0.01% formic acid. Acetonitrile extracts of matrices were vortex-mixed and centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 5°C for 10 minutes. At least 85% of radioactivity was recovered in the supernatants of fecal samples. Supernatants of all matrices were evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen, and residues were reconstituted in 0.25–0.5 ml of water-acetonitrile (9:1). Drug-derived materials were solubilized by sonication and vortex-mixing before centrifuge filtration of samples through a 0.45-mm nylon filter. Filtrates were transferred to 96-well plates for analysis of metabolites by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.
Liquid Chromatography. Except for rat bile, profiling of metabolites in radioactive samples was conducted using an HP 1100 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE)
consisting of a solvent delivery pump, membrane degasser, autosampler, and a v.ARC radioactivity detector (AIM Research Company, Hockessin, DE). Chromatographic separation of the unchanged drug and its metabolites was achieved using a HyPurity Aquastar reverse-phase HPLC column (150 � 2.1 mm ID, 3 mm; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Bellefonte, PA) kept at 50°C. A flow rate of 0.4 ml/min was used throughout the analysis. Sample components were eluted with a nonlinear solvent gradient consisting of 2.5 mM ammonium acetate (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The mobile-phase composition started with 10% B and was increased to 95% B over the course of 35 minutes. The column was then equilibrated for 10 minutes with 10% A. The eluate from the HPLC column was split postcolumn into two flows, each directed at a rate of 0.2 ml/min into the radioactivity detector and the mass spectrometer (MS). The radioactivity detector was operated in the homogeneous liquid scintillation dynamic flow counting mode with the addition of 0.2 ml/min of StopFlow AD scintillation cocktail (AIM Research Company, Hockessin, DE) to the eluate and mix before radioactivity detection.
Rat bile samples were analyzed using Accela (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) or Acquity/Binary Solvent Manager (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) UHPLC systems equipped with an Uptisphere Strategy RPX C-18-2 column (150 � 3 mm ID, 2.2 mm) (Interchim, Montlucon, France) and coupled to a Berthold LB-509 radioactivity detector (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). Samples were eluted at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min with a linear solvent gradient consisting of 2.5 mM ammonium acetate (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The eluate from the UHPLC system was split postcolumn into two flows, 0.65 ml/min into the radioactivity detector, and 0.15 ml/min into the mass spectrometer. Ultima Flo M scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) was added with a Berthold scintillator pump via a custom-made variable scintillation flow setup (Cuyckens, et al., 2008). The mobile-phase composition started with 10% solvent B and was increased to 90% solvent B over the course of 33 minutes. The column was then equilibrated for 6 minutes using initial mobile-phase conditions.
Mass/Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometry. LTQ linear ion trap and LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometers (Thermo Scientific, Inc.) were used for metabolite identification. Both systems were equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in the positive ion mode. Accurate mass measure- ments using LTQ/Orbitrap were obtained by modification of a previously
TABLE 1
Percentage of radioactive dose recovery in mice, rats, dogs, and humans
Species Sex No. of Subjects Dose Collection Interval (h) %Radioactive Dose
Urine Bile Feces Total
Intact mouse Male 4 100 mg/kg 96 5.81 NA 91.8 97.8 Female 4 100 mg/kg 96 6.46 NA 91.7 98.3
BDC mouse Male 5 100 mg/kg 24 N.A. 49.1 NA NA Intact rat Male 4 3 mg/kg 120 4.0 NA 88.5 96.9
Female 4 3 mg/kg 120 5.14 NA 89.9 98.4 BDC rat Male 3 mg/kg 24 3.71 52.2 22.4 78.3 Dog Male 3 4 mg/kg 144 1.9 NA 93.6 99.1 Human Male 6 188 mg 168 32.5 NA 60.4 92.9
BDC, bile duct-cannulated; NA, not applicable.
TABLE 2
Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of total radioactivity in mice, rats, dogs, and humans
Species Sex No. of Subjects Dose Cmax Tmax (h) AUC0–‘
mg/ml h mg×h/ml
Mouse Male 4 100 mg/kg 29.9 7 451 Female 4 100 mg/kg 34.79 4 498
Rat Male 4 3 mg/kg 1.21 8 17.7 Female 4 3 mg/kg 0.933 4 12.1
Dog Male 3 4 mg/kg 5.49 1 87.3 Human Male 6 188 mg 3.74 2a 28.2
AUC, area under the curve. aMedian value.
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 905
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
reported procedure for external mass calibration using a mixture of caffeine, MRFA peptide, and Ultramark 1621 (Ultramark Adhesive Products Ltd, Lancaster, UK) (Lim et al., 2007) or internal mass calibration by infusion of 10 pg/ml of tamoxifen (Lim et al., 2011). The source parameters were tuned for maximum sensitivity by infusion of 5 or 10 ng/ml canagliflozin in 50% acetonitrile/50% water directly into the mobile phase. The same solution was used to define the optimal collision energy used during MSn fragmentation. The unchanged drug and its metabolites were detected using data-dependent multiple-stage mass analysis with an isolation width of 2 Da, normalized collision energy of 20%, 25%, and 30% for MS2, MS3, and MS4, respectively, an activation q of 0.25, and an activation time of 30 ms. Data acquisition and processing were carried out using Xcalibur 2.0 (Thermo Scientific, Inc., San Jose, CA). For a selection of samples, Metabolynx software (Waters, Manchester, UK) was used for metabolite identification via control-analyte comparison after conversion of the XCalibur data.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used for structural elucidation of selected metabolites (see Supplemental Method).
In Vitro Pharmacologic Activities for Canagliflozin and its Metabolites, M5 and M7. The canagliflozin O-glucuronide metabolites M5 and M7 were assessed for potential inhibitory effects on uptake of the SGLT2 substrate a-methyl-D-glucopyranoside in Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells stably expressing human SGLT2. M5 and M7 were each evaluated in separate experiments, and
canagliflozin was included as the reference. Compounds were prepared in assay medium consisting of 50 mM HEPES, 20 mM Tris base, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 137 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. The tested concentration ranges were 0.45–3,000 nM for canagliflozin, 1–5000 nM for M5, and 12–10,000 nM for M7. Lysine-coated 96-well plates were seeded with 30,000 or 65,000 cells per well and incubated in growth medium for up to 48 hours. Cells were rinsed with assay medium and then incubated with test compound solutions. After 15 minutes, 0.1 mCi of 500 mM [14C]a-methyl-D-glucopyranoside was added to each well, and plates were incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. Cells were washed at least three times with ice-cold phosphate buffer solution and then solubilized by adding 0.05 ml/well of MicroScint-20 (PerkinElmer) before assay of radioactivity uptake by LSC.
Data Analysis
The radioactivity excreted in urine and feces was expressed as percentage of the administered radioactivity. The mass balance of canagliflozin and its metabolites was based on total recovery of radioactivity in urine and feces plus collected residual material. Profiles of the plasma concentrations of radioactivity and canagliflozin or its metabolites were analyzed by standard noncompartmental analysis (WinNonlin v4.0.1; Pharsight, Mountainview, CA). At a minimum the following parameters were estimated: Cmax and corresponding peak time (Tmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC).
Results
Excretion of Radioactive Dose
Recovery of radioactivity in urine, feces, or bile was determined after administration of a single oral dose of [14C]canagliflozin to intact mice, rats, dogs, or humans or to BDC mice and BDC rats (Table 1). Most of the radioactive dose administered to intact animals and humans was excreted in feces, with mean radioactivity recoveries of approximately 92% (0–96 hours) in mice, 89–90% (0–120 hours) in rats, 94% (0–144 hours) in dogs, and 60% (0–168 hours) in humans. The radioactivity in fecal samples from mice and humans was calculated as the sum of the radioactivity in the methanol extracts and the fecal residues prepared from these samples. Mean percentages of radioactivity in urine during the same intervals in intact animals were
TABLE 3
Relative distribution of metabolites in pooled plasma from mice, rats, dogs, and humans after oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin
Metabolite Identification
%Sample Radioactivitya
Mouse (100 mg/kg) Rat (3 mg/kg) Dog (4 mg/kg) Human (188 mg)
Male Female Male Female Male Male
Canagliflozin 94.2 93.9 98.2 98.6 98.7 61.8 M5 ND ND ND ND ND 19.2 M7 2.6 1.6 ND ND ND 13.6 M9 1.6 2.2 ND ND ND 3.1 Total 98.4 97.7 98.2 98.6 98.7 97.7
ND not detected. aPlasma samples pooled over 0–24 h.
Fig. 2. Liquid chromatography-radiochromatograms of canagliflozin and metabolites in plasma of male mice (A) and humans (B). Administered doses are shown in Table 3.
906 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
approximately 6% in mice, 4% to 5% in rats, 2% in dogs, and 33% in humans. The mean recovery of the total radioactivity in bile during a 24-hour collection interval accounted for approximately 49% of the dose in BDC mice and 52% in BDC rats. In BDC rats, the total radioactivity in feces represented approximately 22% of the dose, whereas a smaller amount (;4%) was found in urine. Total recovery of radioactivity ranged from approximately 97% to 99% in intact animals and 93% in humans.
Pharmacokinetics of Total Radioactivity
Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma radioactivity in mice, rats, dogs, and humans are summarized in Table 2. Plasma radioactivity Tmax values ranged between 1 and 8 hours and were lowest in dogs and humans. Plasma radioactivity exposures based on Cmax and AUC values were highest in mice and lowest in rats.
Metabolite Profiles in Plasma
The recovery of radioactivity in pooled plasma samples from animals and humans after solvent extraction ranged from 82% to 92%. Canagliflozin and metabolites were identified in 0- to 24-hour pooled plasma samples from animals and humans (Table 3). For animals, overall plasma pools were used as a result of the limited sample volumes from individual time points. To facilitate species comparison, human plasma values were derived from radiochromatograms and generated by Hamilton pooling of the pooled individual time-point plasma samples (Hamilton et al., 1981). The proportion of plasma TR attributed to canagliflozin was 94% to 99% in animals and 62% in humans. M5 and M7, direct O-glucuronide metabolites of canagliflozin, and M9, hydroxylated canagliflozin, represented ;19%, 14%, and 3% of human plasma TR, respectively. M7 and M9 in mouse plasma accounted for #3% of TR. No circulatory metabolites were detected in rats and dogs. M5 was not detected in animal plasma at the administered [14C]canagliflozin doses used in these studies. Radiochromatograms with metabolite peaks in mouse and human plasma are shown in Fig. 2. In the human study, blood samples were taken from 1.5 to 24 hours
after [14C]canagliflozin administration, and plasma pools were created for each time point. As shown in Fig. 3, total radioactivity and canagliflozin were slowly eliminated from plasma during the entire sampling period. Concentrations of M5, M7, and M9 were maximal at
4 hours, and the M5 level declined markedly after 8 hours. None of these metabolites was detectable at 24 hours. The human plasma concentration-time data were used to calculate
systemic exposure for TR, canagliflozin, and its metabolites (Table 4). Relative to TR, unchanged drug is the major circulating component. Systemic exposures for M5 and M7 exceeded 10% of TR and are thus considered major human circulating metabolites. M9 can be classified as a minor human metabolite because its systemic exposure was only 2% of TR.
Metabolite Profiles in Urine
As summarized in Table 5, urinary excretion was a minor elimination pathway for canagliflozin and metabolites in mice, rats, dogs, and humans. Representative radiochromatograms are shown in Fig. 4. Unchanged drug represented anywhere from 0.2% to 0.3% of the administered dose in animals. The only components detected in human urine were M5 and M7, representing 14% and 18% of the administered radioactive dose. The amount of M5 and M7 excreted in mouse urine was low, but these metabolites were not detected in rat and dog urine. Urinary metabolites representing ,5% of the dose included O-glucuronides of mono-oxygenated unchanged drug (M1, M2) in mice, a dioxygenated metabolite (M4) in mice and dogs, a carboxy metabolite (M6) in rats, and hydroxylated metabolites (M8, M9) in mice, rats, and dogs.
Metabolite Profiles in Feces
Overall pools of fecal methanol-water extracts created from samples collected during the first 2 or 3 days represented at least 95% of the
TABLE 4
Systemic exposure to total radioactivity, canagliflozin and its metabolites in plasma of human subjects following oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin
Analyte AUC (ng-eq.h/ml)a % Total Radioactivity
Total radioactivity (14C) 28,195b 100 Canagliflozin 16,892 59.9 M5 5207 18.5 M7 4385 15.6 M9 678 2.4
AUC, area under the curve. aCalculated from radio-high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of plasma samples
pooled at each time point. bMean of AUC values from six healthy male subjects.
TABLE 5
Relative distribution of metabolites in urine from mice, rats, dogs, and humans after oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin
Metabolite Identification
%Dosea
Mouse (100 mg/kg) Rat (3 mg/kg) Dog (4 mg/kg) Human (188 mg)
Male Female Male Female Male Male
Canagliflozin 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 ND M1 0.7 0.1 ND ND ND ND M2 0.3 ND ND ND ND ND M4 ND 0.4 ND ND 0.4 ND M5 ND 0.1 ND ND ND 13.7 M6 ND ND 0.9 0.4 ND ND M7 1.3 1.1 ND ND ND 18.2 M8 0.2 1.0 2.7 4.1 0.8 ND M9 2.3 3.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 ND Total 5.1 6.2 4.0 5.3 2.0 31.9
ND, not detected. aUrine samples pooled over 0–48 h.
Fig. 3. Concentrations of TR, canagliflozin, and its metabolites in pooled human plasma samples after a single oral administration of 188 mg of [14C]canagliflozin to healthy human subjects. Percentages of unchanged drug and metabolites in plasma samples from the mass-balance study were converted to concentrations (ng-base eq/ml) using a specific activity of 7.72 KBq/mg (463.2 dpm/mg). TR in plasma was quantified by LSC.
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 907
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
radioactivity recovered during the entire collection period. Represen- tative radiochromatograms of fecal samples from mice, rats, dogs, and humans after oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin are shown in Fig. 5. As shown in Table 6, fecal excretion was the primary elimination route of canagliflozin and its metabolites in animals. Canagliflozin accounted for 3.5% to 11% of the administered radioactivity dose in feces from female mice, rats, and dogs and 33% of the dose in male mice. Metabolite M8 was most abundant in rat and dog feces, accounting for 42% to 59% of the dose, and M9 was most abundant in mouse feces, representing 28% to 29% of the dose. M7 was a fecal metabolite in male and female mice and in dogs, where it represented, respectively, 6% ,14%, and 7% of the dose. Other fecal metabolites were M1 in rat, M4 in mouse and dog, M5 in mouse, M6 in mice and rats, and M10 in rat. In human feces, unchanged drug was the major component, representing 39% of the dose, and M7 and M9 occurred as minor metabolites at 2% and 8% of the dose.
Metabolite Profiles in Bile
Distribution of metabolites of pooled bile samples from mice and rats are shown in Table 6. In BDC mice administered 100 mg/kg of [14C]canagliflozin, M7 was the major biliary metabolite identified in the 0- to 24-hour bile pool, representing 37% of the administered dose. Unchanged drug and M8 accounted for 4% and 7% of the administered dose. M1 and M2 were only detected by MS. In 24-hour bile collections from rats that received a single dose of
3 mg/kg [14C]canagliflozin, the predominant metabolites in bile, each accounting for ;4%–12% of the administered dose, were M5, M6, M7, and M8. Less prominent metabolites (, 3% of administered dose) included the O-glucuronide M5B, oxidative metabolites M12, M18, and
M19 and oxidative metabolites that underwent glucuronidation (M1, M13, M14, M15, M16). Unchanged drug accounted for approximately 2% of the dose. Rat bile collected over an 8-hour period was left untreated or mixed with b-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase in vitro to determine the metabolites susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis. Radiochromatogram peaks corresponding to O-glucuronide metabo- lites M1, M5, M5B, M7, M13, and M14 in untreated bile samples (Fig. 6A) disappeared in the enzyme-treated bile samples, whereas peak areas increased for the aglycones corresponding to canagliflozin, M8, and M18 (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that M1, M5, M5B, M7, M13, and M14 are O-glucuronide metabolites.
Identification of Metabolites by LC-MS/MS
Canagliflozin and its metabolites were initially detected by LC radioprofiling with subsequent structure elucidation using unit resolution multiple-stage MS analyses. Product ions from multiple- stage mass analysis were used to elucidate the site of biotransforma- tion based on mass shift of the ammonium adduct and its product ions from those derived from canagliflozin. Therefore, high-resolution accurate mass measurement of canagliflozin by LTQ/Orbitrap was conducted to confirm assignment of its product ions from unit mass resolution. These results were used to bridge and facilitate the assignment of product ions from each metabolite. The ammonium adducts, diagnostic product ions, biotransformation
pathways, and detection in species investigated of canagliflozin and its metabolites are tabulated in Table 7. The identity of a metabolite was confirmed by either cochromatography with reference standard or by one- or two-dimensional NMR analysis. Details of the structural elucidation of canagliflozin and its metabolites by multiple-stage MS
Fig. 4. Liquid chromatography-radiochro- matograms of canagliflozin and metabolites in urine of female mice (A) and in male rats (B), dogs (C), and humans (D). Administered doses are shown in Table 3.
908 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
analyses are described in the following sections of this article. The proposed structures of detected metabolites were used to postulate the in vivo metabolic pathways for canagliflozin in mice, rats, dogs, and humans (Fig. 7). Mass spectra of unchanged drug and major animal and human metabolites are shown in Figs. 8, 9, and10. Canagliflozin. The accurate full scan and product ion mass spectra
of canagliflozin are shown in Fig. 8. Full-scan mass analysis gave an ammonium adduct [M + NH4]
+ instead of protonated molecule of canagliflozin at m/z 462 (462.17450, C24H29O5NFS, 10.5 RDB, 0.00 ppm), which is commonly observed with electrospray ionization of neutral compound. Collision-induced dissociation of [M + NH4]
+ at m/z 462 gave product ion at m/z 445 (445.14838, C24H26O5NFS, 11.5 RDB, 0.97 ppm) from loss of NH3, which further undergoes sequential loss of H2O to form ions at m/z 427 (427.13745, C24H24O4NFS, 12.5 RDB, 0.15 ppm), 409 (409.12717, C24H22O3NFS, 13.5 RDB, 0.86 ppm), 391 (391.11655, C24H20O2NFS, 14.5 RDB, 0.29 ppm), and 373 (373.10547, C24H18ONFS, 15.5 RDB, 20.59 ppm). Product ions at m/z 367 (367.11600, C22H20O2FS, 12.5 RDB, 20.70 ppm), 349 (349.10559, C22H18OFS, 13.5 RDB, 20.29 ppm), and 325 (325.10562, C20H18OFS,
11.5 RDB, 20.22 ppm) were postulated to derive from cleavage of the 6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3,4,5-triol moiety based on chemical formulae from accurate mass measurements (see insert structure). Two product ions at m/z 267 (267.12268, C14H19O5, 5.5 RDB, 20.08 ppm) and 191 (191.03255, C11H8FS, 7.5 RDB, 0.13 ppm) from cleavage of bond linking benzylic carbon and thiophene moiety and bond linking benzylic carbon and 4-methylphenyl moiety, respectively, are useful in the localization of the site of biotransforma- tion. The product ion at m/z 267 undergoes sequential losses of H2O to form ions at m/z 249 (249.11197, C14H17O4, 6.5 RDB, 20.66 ppm) and 231 (231.10150, C14H15O3, 7.5 RDB, 20.31 ppm). Alternatively, the product ion at m/z 267 undergoes cleavage of the 6-(hydroxymethyl) tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3,4,5-triol moiety to form ions at m/z 171 (171.08018, C12H11O, 7.5 RDB, 21.53 ppm) and 147 (147.08009, C10H11O, 5.5 RDB, 22.39 ppm). Metabolite M1. The [M+NH4]
+ of M1 at m/z 654 was 192 Da higher than that of canagliflozin, which corresponded to addition of an oxygen atom and a glucuronide moiety to canagliflozin. This was supported by loss of 176 Da to form the [M + NH4]
+ of the aglycone
Fig. 5. Liquid chromatography-radiochromatograms of canagliflozin and its metabolites in feces of female mice (A) and in male rats (B), dogs (C), and humans (D). Administered doses are shown in Table 3.
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 909
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
of M1 at m/z 478. The diagnostic product ions at m/z 347, 323, and 191 localized the addition of the oxygen atom likely to the 1-ethyl-4- methylbenzene moiety of canagliflozin. The product ions at m/z 347 and 323 were speculated to correspond to addition of an oxygen atom
and followed by loss of a water molecule from product ion of canagliflozin at m/z 349 and 325, respectively. Hence, M1 was assigned the structure of a glucuronide conjugate of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin.
TABLE 6
Relative distribution of metabolites in feces and bile from mice, rats, dogs, and humans after oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin
Metabolite Identification
%Dose
Fecesa Bileb
Mouse (100 mg/kg) Rat (3 mg/kg) Dog (4 mg/kg) Human (188 mg) Mouse (100 mg/kg) Rat (3 mg/kg)
Male Female Male Female Male Male Male Male
Canagliflozin 32.5 10.1 3.5 5.3 11.1 38.7 4.4 2.17 M1 ND ND 5.5 18 ND ND MSc 2.41 M2 ND ND ND ND ND ND MS ND M4 2.7 9.3 ND ND 11.2 ND ND ND M5 0.8 2.4 ND ND ND ND ND 4.01 M5B ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.13 M6 1.8 3.7 10.1 7.9 ND ND ND 5.93 M7 6.4 14 ND ND 7.1 2.3 36.9 12.26 M8 13.6 17.3 51.9 58.8 41.8 ND 6.9 7.12 M9 27.6 29 17.6 2.1 22.5 7.6 ND ND M10 ND ND 2.6 1.4 ND ND ND ND M12 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.52 M13/M14 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.56 M15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.69 M16 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.27 M17 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.82 M18 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.93 M19 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.55 Total 85.4 85.8 91.2 93.5 93.7 48.6 48.2 47.37
MS, mass spectrometry; ND, not detected. aFeces samples pooled over 0 to 48 h for mice, rats, and humans, and 0 to 72 h for dogs bCollection interval of 0–24 h cMS indicates the metabolite was only observed by mass spectrometry
Fig. 6. Liquid chromatography-radiochromatograms of canagliflozin and metabolites in untreated rat bile (A) or after in vitro treatment of rat bile with b-glucuronidase/ arylsulfatase (B). The administered dose is shown in Table 6.
910 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
Metabolite M2. M2 had an identical ammonium adduct and product ions as the metabolite M1, which suggested that M2 was an isomer of metabolite M1. Thus, M2 was identified as another glucuronide conjugate of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin. Metabolite M4. The ammonium adduct of M4 was 32 Da higher
than that of canagliflozin, suggesting that M4 resulted from addition of two oxygen atoms. The addition of 32 Da to the product ion of canagliflozin at m/z 325, followed by the sequential loss of a water molecule, gave product ions of M4 at m/z 339 and 321, respectively. This, together with the product ion at m/z 191, infers that that the two additional oxygen atoms are localized to the 1-ethyl-4-methylbenzene moiety of canagliflozin. Metabolite M5. The ammonium adduct of metabolite M5 displayed
a higher mass shift of 176 Da from the corresponding ion of canagliflozin. This mass shift was consistent with a direct ether glucuronide conjugate of canagliflozin and was supported by detection of the ammonium adduct of the aglycone at m/z 462, which was identical to the ammonium adduct of canagliflozin. Also, the product ion mass spectra contained many of the diagnostic product ions of canagliflozin at m/z 445, 427, 409, 391, 373, 349, 325, 267, and 191 (Fig. 9A). NMR analysis of M5 isolated from human urine demonstrated that attachment of the glucuronide moiety was at the 29 of 2-hydroxymethyl-tetrahydropyrantriol moiety (Supplemental Fig. 2; Supplemental Table 1). The metabolite M5 was confirmed by its coelution with reference synthetic standard and good agreement of their product ion mass spectra (data not shown). Metabolite M6. M6 had an ammonium adduct at m/z 476 that was
14 Da higher than that of canagliflozin, which was consistent with addition of an oxygen atom and loss of 2 hydrogens. The product ion at m/z 267 from canagliflozin was shifted by 14 Da to form the product ion of M6 at m/z 281, which lost a water molecule to form m/z 263. These ions, together with observation of identical unchanged product ions of canagliflozin at m/z 325, 191, and 147, suggested that the site of biotransformation occurred on the 6-hydroxymethyl group of the 6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3,4,5-triol moiety. Therefore, M6 was assigned the structure of a carboxy metabolite and was confirmed by its coelution with reference synthetic standard and good agreement of their product ion mass spectra (data not shown). Metabolite M7. The full scan and product ion mass spectra of
metabolite M7 were similar to the mass spectra of M5 (Fig. 9). Therefore, like M5, the metabolite M7 was assigned the structure of an isomeric ether glucuronide of canagliflozin. NMR analysis of M7
isolated from human urine demonstrated that attachment of the glu- curonide moiety was at the 39 of 2-hydroxymethyl-tetrahydropyrantriol moiety (Supplemental Fig. 3; Supplemental Table 1). The metabolite M7 was confirmed by its coelution with reference synthetic standard and good agreement of their product ion mass spectra (data not shown). Metabolite M8. M8 displayed an ammonium adduct at m/z 478 that
was 16 Da higher than that of canagliflozin and was consistent with the addition of an oxygen atom. The product ion at m/z 323 was postulated to derive from addition of an oxygen atom to the product ion from canagliflozin at m/z 325, followed by loss of a water molecule (Fig. 10A). This ion, together with the product ion at m/z 191, localized the likely addition of an oxygen atom to the 1-ethyl-4- methylbenzene moiety of canagliflozin. As shown by NMR analysis of M8 isolated from rat methanolic feces extract, hydroxylation occurred at the methyl group of the 1-ethyl-4-methyl-benzene moiety of unchanged drug. Hence, M8 was assigned the structure of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin. The metabolite M8 was confirmed by its coelution with reference synthetic standard and good agreement of their product ion mass spectra (data not shown). Metabolite M9. The metabolite M9 was another hydroxylated
metabolite of canagliflozin based on the identical ammonium adduct as M8, M18, and M19 at m/z 478. The observed identical product ion from canagliflozin at m/z 267 and the 16-Da higher mass shift of the ion at m/z 191 from canagliflozin to form the product ion at m/z 207 suggested the likely addition of an oxygen atom to (4-fluorophenyl)- thiophene moiety (Fig. 10B). NMR analysis of M9 isolated from mouse feces confirmed that hydroxylation occurred on the benzylic carbon linking methyl-phenyl and thiophene moieties of the un- changed drug (Supplemental Fig. 4; Supplemental Table 1). M9 was confirmed by its coelution with reference synthetic standard and good agreement of their product ion mass spectra (data not shown). The hydroxylation of the prochiral benzylic carbon atom created a chiral center resulted in M9 consisted of diastereomers; however, separation of the diastereomers or the chirality of M9 was not established. Metabolite M10. M10 had similar full scan and product ion mass
spectra as M8 and is thus likely to be an isomer of M8. Thus, M10 was assigned the structure of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin and with the oxygen atom likely to be added to the 1-ethyl-4- methylbenzene moiety of canagliflozin. Metabolite M12. The ammonium adduct of M12 displayed a higher
mass shift of 30 Da from canagliflozin, which was consistent with the
TABLE 7
Mass spectral analysis of canagliflozin metabolites in mice, rats, dogs, and humans
Metabolite [M + H]+ Diagnostic Product Ions Biotransformation Pathways Species
Canagliflozin 462 445, 427, 409, 391, 373, 349a, 325a, 267a, 191a, 147a — — M1 654 619, 601, 583, 547, 478a, 443a, 425, 407, 389, 347a, 323a, 191a Oxidation, glucuronidation Mouse, rat M2 654 619, 601, 583, 547, 478a, 443a, 425, 407, 389, 347a, 323a, 191a Oxidation, glucuronidation Mouse M4 494 459, 441, 423, 405, 387, 369, 339a, 321a, 191a Oxidation Mouse, dog M5 638 603, 585, 567, 549, 531, 507, 487, 462, 445a, 427, 409, 391, 373, 349a, 325, 267, 191a Glucuronidation Mouse, rat, dog, human M6 476 459, 441, 423, 405, 387, 325a, 281, 263a, 191a, 147a Alcohol oxidation Mouse, rat M7 638 603, 585, 567, 549, 531, 507, 487, 462, 445a, 427, 409,
391, 373, 349a, 325, 267, 191a Glucuronidation Mouse, rat, dog, human
M8 478 460, 443, 425, 407, 389, 347a, 323a, 191a Hydroxylation Mouse, rat, dog M9 478 461, 443, 425, 407, 389, 365a, 341a, 267, 207a Hydroxylation Mouse, rat, dog, human M10 478 460, 443, 425, 407, 389, 347, 283a, 191a Oxidation Rat M12 492 475, 457, 439, 421, 403, 379, 355, 337, 323 Oxidation Rat M14 654 619, 601, 583, 565, 547, 523, 478, 461, 443, 425, 407, 389, 365, 341, 231, 207 Oxidation, glucuronidation Rat M15 654 601, 583, 565, 547, 523, 461, 425, 407, 389, 383, 365, 341, 267, 231, 207 Oxidation, glucuronidation Rat M16 654 461, 443, 425, 407, 376, 365, 341, 207 Oxidation, glucuronidation Rat M17 638 549, 531, 462, 427, 409, 391, 373, 349, 325, 267, 231, 191 Glucuronidation Rat M18 478 461, 443, 425, 407, 389, 383, 365, 341, 267, 249, 231, 207 Oxidation Rat M19 478 461, 443, 425, 407, 365, 353, 341, 207 Oxidation Rat
aDiagnostic fragments.
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 911
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
addition of two oxygen atoms and loss of two hydrogens from canagliflozin. The product ions at m/z 349 and 325 from canagliflozin were observed to shift by 30 Da higher to form the product ions of M12 at m/z 379 and 355, respectively. The product ion at m/z 323 originated from addition of 30 Da to 2-(2,5-dimethylbenzyl)-5-(4- fluorophenyl)thiophene moiety of canagliflozin. Thus, M12 was assigned the structure from initial dihydroxylation and followed by further oxidation of 1 hydroxyl group to a carbonyl functionality. Metabolite M13/M14. M13 and M14 had an ammonium adduct at
m/z 654 that was 192 Da higher than that of canagliflozin, and the mass shift of 192 Da corresponded to addition of an oxygen atom and a glucuronide moiety. This was supported by detection of the ammonium adduct of the aglycone at m/z 478, which was 16 Da higher than the corresponding ion from canagliflozin. Detection of the unchanged product ions from canagliflozin at m/z 267, 249, and 231 and the higher16-Da mass shift of the m/z 207 (191 + 16) ion from canagliflozin point to
oxidation of the 4-fluorophenyl)-thiophene moiety. However, the exact site of glucuronidation could not be inferred from the product ion mass spectra. M13 and M14 were identified as O-glucuronides of a hydroxyl- ated metabolite of canagliflozin. Metabolite M15. M15 showed full-scan and product ion mass
spectra similar to those of the isomeric metabolite M14. The product ions from canagliflozin at m/z 267, 249, and 231 were unchanged in M15 and, together with 16-Da higher mass shift of the ion at m/z 191 from canagliflozin to give the product ion at m/z 207, suggested the addition of the oxygen atom to (4-fluorophenyl)-thiophene moiety. Therefore, M15 is another ether glucuronide of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin, but the site of glucuronidation could not be ascertained. Metabolite M16. M16 had an identical ammonium adduct at m/z
654 as M14 and M15, which suggested that M16 is an isomer. The product ion at m/z 207 was speculated to derive from 16-Da higher
Fig. 7. Proposed in vivo metabolic pathways for canagliflozin in mice, rats, dogs, and humans.
912 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
mass shift of the product ion from canagliflozin at m/z 191; therefore, the addition of an oxygen atom was localized to (4-fluorophenyl)- thiophene moiety. Thus, M16 was assigned as another isomeric glucuronide conjugate of a hydroxylated metabolite with an uncertain site of glucuronidation. Metabolite M17. The ammonium adduct of M17 was detected at
m/z 638, which was identical to that of M5 and M7. The observed ammonium adduct of the aglycone at m/z 462, together with the diagnostic product ions at m/z 567 (391 + 176), 549 (379 + 176), 531 (549 2 H2O), 462 (ammonium adduct parent drug), 427, 409, 391, 373, 349, 325, 267, 231, and 191 from collision-induced dissociation, sug- gested that M17 is an isomeric ether glucuronide conjugate of canagliflozin. The site of glucuronidation cannot be established from MS data. Metabolite M18. The ammonium adduct of metabolite M18 was
observed at m/z 478, and the 16-Da higher mass shift from canagliflozin was consistent with addition of an oxygen atom. The unchanged product ion from canagliflozin at m/z 267, together with 16-Da higher mass shift of the ion at m/z 191 from canagliflozin to form product ion at m/z 207, suggested the addition of an oxygen atom to the (4-fluorophenyl)-thiophene moiety. M18 was therefore assigned the structure of a hydroxylated metabolite and with the site of hydroxylation localized to (4-fluorophenyl)-thiophene moiety. Metabolite M19. M19 showed an ammonium adduct at m/z 478 that
was 16 Da higher than that of canagliflozin and was consistent with addition of an oxygen atom. The product ion at m/z 323 can be explained by a water loss from the oxidized canagliflozin product ion at
m/z 325. This ion, together with the unchanged product ion at m/z 191, indicating that the 2-(4-fluorophenyl)methylthiophene moiety is un- changed, points to oxidation of the 1-ethyl-4-methylbenzene moiety of canagliflozin. Hence, M19 was assigned the structure of a hydroxylated metabolite of canagliflozin and probably an isomer of M8.
In Vitro Pharmacologic Activity
Metabolites M5 and M7 were tested separately for potential inhibitory activity on substrate uptake by human SGLT2 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells. Canagliflozin was included as a positive control in each assay. The IC50 values for canagliflozin and M5 were 1.3 nM and 1014 nM, respectively, and for canagliflozin and M7, these values were 7.3 nM and 5900 nM, respectively. M5 and M7 are each 800-fold less potent than canagliflozin and are considered pharmacologically inactive.
Discussion
In this study, the excretion and biotransformation of canagliflozin after a single oral administration of [14C]canagliflozin were in- vestigated in mice, rats, dogs, and humans. Canagliflozin was well tolerated at the doses used in the metabolism and excretion studies in mice, rats, dogs, and at the dose given to normal healthy subjects during the mass-balance study. Mass balance for orally administered [14C]canagliflozin was achieved
based on a range of 93% to 99% recovery of total radioactivity from excreta of intact animals and humans (Beumer et al., 2006). In human
Fig. 8. Accurate mass full scan (A) and product ion mass spectra (B) of canagliflozin.
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 913
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
subjects, the proportion of TR eliminated into urine (33%) surpassed that of animal species (2%–7%). Most (i.e., 89%–94%) of the administered radioactive dose in animals was excreted in feces, and a substantial amount of TR (60%) in humans was recovered in feces. Liquid chromatography with radioactivity detection and MS/MS
analysis of fecal, urine, and bile samples indicated that canagliflozin was converted to a number of metabolites. The proposed in vivo biotransformation pathways for canagliflozin are shown in Fig. 7. Oxidative metabolism and glucuronidation are the proposed in vivo metabolic pathways of canagliflozin in animal species and humans. Unchanged drug was the major circulating component in all species
investigated. The O-glucuronides M5 and M7 were the major circulatory metabolites in humans, and M9, an oxidative product, was a minor metabolite. In comparison, there was low abundance of M5, M7, and M9 in mouse plasma, and no circulatory metabolites were detected in rats and dogs. The absence of or low abundance of circulatory metabolites in animal species is consistent with their elimination primarily by the biliary/fecal route. Canagliflozin is extensively metabolized in animals. Metabolites
and unchanged drug represented 53%–88% and ;4%–33%, re- spectively, of the total radioactive dose recovered in mouse, rat, and dog feces. Oxidative metabolism as the primary mode of bio- transformation in animal species is supported by the high abundance of hydroxylated metabolites M8 and M9 in excreta, where together they accounted for 41%–70% of the administered radioactive dose. The other metabolites were those formed by oxidation (M4, M6, and M10) and a combination of oxidation followed by glucuronidation (M1 and M2). The presence of M5 and M7 in mouse feces and M7 in dog feces indicates that direct O-glucuronidation of canagliflozin occurs in animals. The minor metabolites M1 and M2 are postulated to be O-glucuronide isomers of M8.
In humans, canagliflozin is less extensively metabolized than in animal species. M5, M7, and M9 were the only human metabolites identified, and these were detected in at least one animal species used in canagliflozin safety assessments. The presence of M5 and M7 as major metabolites in plasma and urine demonstrates that O-glucuronidation is the primary biotransformation pathway in humans. Unlike animal species, oxidative metabolism is considered a minor metabolic pathway in humans because of the low abundance of M9 in feces. Results from a reaction phenotyping study with recombinant human cytochrome P450 or UGT enzymes suggested that CYP3A4 metabolizes canagli- flozin to M9, and UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 metabolizes cangliflozin to M7 and M5, respectively (unpublished results). Studies in BDC mice and rats showed that a large portion of
radioactivity from administered [14C]canagliflozin is excreted into bile, amounting to approximately 50% of the dose in each species. M7 was the main metabolite found in mouse and rat bile. Other metabolites detected in rat bile included direct O-glucuronide conjugates (M5, M5B), minor oxidative metabolites (M12, M18, and M19), and oxidative metabolites that further underwent glucuronidation (M1, M13, M14, M15, M16). Results from the analysis of bile samples treated with b-glucuronidase substantiated that M1, M5, M5B, M7, M13, and M14 were glucuronide conjugates. Based on the hydrolysis experiment and MS analysis of bile samples, it was confirmed that M13, M14, and M1 are glucuronide conjugates of M8, M18, and M8 respectively. However, the position of glucuronidation on M8 or M18 could not be confirmed. The high abundance of canagliflozin in feces from male mice (33%)
and humans (39%) is consistent with the aglycone arising from enzymatic hydrolysis of glucuronide metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract. The primary source of fecal canagliflozin appears to be M7 since it represented 37% of the dose excreted in bile of male mice but
Fig. 9. Product ion mass spectra of M5 (A) and M7 (B).
914 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
amounted to only 6% of the dose in feces of intact male mice. Similarly, the percentage of M7 in human feces was low (2%). Hydrolysis of glucuronides in the gastrointestinal tract was supported by an experiment with mouse and human fecal aqueous homogenates. When M5 and M7 were incubated in vitro with the fecal preparations, they were rapidly hydrolyzed to canagliflozin, presumably by gut microflora glucuronidases (unpublished results). The pooled plasma metabolite profiles for different species allow for
direct comparison of the extent of systemic exposures to drug-related components at well-tolerated dose levels. After [14C]canagliflozin was orally administered, the percentage of sample radioactivity representing unchanged drug was 94% to 98% in 0- to 24-hour pooled plasma samples of animal species. In human plasma samples, the percentage of sample radioactivity attributed to canagliflozin was 45%–66% at 1.5–12 hours and 99% at 24 hours. Components accounting for the remainder of sample radioactivity during the 1.5- to 12-hour period were metabolites M7 (16% –29%), M5 (2%–30%), and a M9 (2%–4%). Among animal species, M7 and M9 were detected only in plasma from mice (about 2%–3%). However, after repeated dosing with 100 mg/kg canagliflozin in chronic mouse, rat, and dog toxicology studies, M5 and M7 were found at quantifiable levels in plasma samples analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Moreover, biliary excretion studies in mouse and rat confirm substantial exposure of liver to M5 and M7; the liver is the primary organ for the metabolism of canagliflozin. M5 and M7 have been excluded from safety testing because they are
800-fold less potent as SGLT2 inhibitors compared with canagliflozin and are considered pharmacologically inactive. The high percentage excretion
of M5 and M7 in human urine is consistent with rapid elimination from the body due to their high water solubility ($50 mg/ml), whereas canagliflozin is practically insoluble in water (;0.150 mg/ml). Nonclinical safety testing of human metabolites is required when
circulating levels are significantly greater than the maximum exposure seen in the nonclinical toxicity studies. This rule applies when exposure of the metabolite in plasma is greater than 10% of total drug- related exposure. Some metabolites, such as O-glucuronides, are excluded from safety testing because they are generally pharmaco- logically inactive and chemically nonreactive in nature (Gao et al., 2013). As discussed already herein, M5 and M7 met these criteria and were therefore excluded from safety testing. In conclusion, canagliflozin elimination in animals and humans is
through biotransformation pathways of oxidation and O-glucuronidation. In animal species, oxidative metabolites of canagliflozin account for most of the drug-related material, and these are eliminated mainly into feces via biliary excretion. In humans, the major circulatory metabolites M5 and M7 are formed by direct O-glucuronidation of canagliflozin and are excreted mainly in urine. However, elimination of M5 and M7 in feces may be underestimated as a result of enzyme- mediated hydrolysis of glucuronides back to parent drug, presumably by microflora in the gastrointestinal tract. All human metabolites were detected in at least one nonclinical species used in the safety assessments of canagliflozin. Although the O-glucuronides M5 and M7 are major human circulating metabolites, their pharmacologic inactivity is consistent with the scientific consensus that such conjugates pose minimal or no safety risk.
Fig. 10. Product ion mass spectra of M8 (A) and M9 (B).
In Vivo Metabolism of Canagliflozin in Animals and Humans 915
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following from Janssen Pharmaceutical Research & Development; Dr. Gerry Gendimenico for providing editorial assistance with the manuscript; Dr. Geert Mannens for evaluation of radiation exposure; Dr. Yong Gong, Dr. Marteen Vliegen, and Dr. Walter Filliers for synthesis and purification of reference metabolites; and Dr. Yin Liang for testing the pharmacologic activity of canagliflozin and its two glucuronide conjugates.
Authorship Contributions Participated in research design: Mamidi, Cuyckens, Scheers, Silva, Sha,
Kelley, Devineni, Johnson, Lim. Conducted experiments: Chen, Kalamaridis, Lin, Sha. Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Lin, Lim. Performed data analysis: Mamidi, Cuyckens, Chen, Scheers, Kalamaridis,
Lim. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Mamidi, Cuyckens,
Scheers, Evans, Kelley, Devineni, Johnson, Lim.
References
Beumer JH, Beijnen JH, and Schellens JH (2006) Mass balance studies, with a focus on anti- cancer drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 45:33–58.
Chen L, Magliano DJ, and Zimmet PZ (2012) The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus—present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8:228–236.
Cuyckens F, Koppen V, Kembuegler R, and Leclercq L (2008) Improved liquid chromatography: online radioactivity detection for metabolite profiling. J Chromatogr A 1209:128–135.
Devineni D, Curtin CR, Polidori D, Gutierrez MJ, Murphy J, Rusch S, and Rothenberg PL (2013) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol 53:601–610.
Gao H, Jacobs A, White RE, Booth BP, and Obach RS (2013) Meeting report: metabolites in safety testing (MIST) symposium-safety assessment of human metabolites: what’s REALLY necessary to ascertain exposure coverage in safety tests? AAPS J 15:970–973.
Hamilton RA, Garnett WR, and Kline BJ (1981) Determination of mean valproic acid serum level by assay of a single pooled sample. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29:408–413.
Hardman TC and Dubrey SW (2011) Development and potential role of type-2 sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors for management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2:133–145.
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources(1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 7th ed. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Liang Y, Arakawa K, Ueta K, Matsushita Y, Kuriyama C, Martin T, Du F, Liu Y, Xu J, and Conway B, et al. (2012) Effect of canagliflozin on renal threshold for glucose, glycemia, and body weight in normal and diabetic animal models. PLoS ONE 7:e30555.
Lim HK, Chen J, Sensenhauser C, Cook K, Preston R, Thomas T, Shook B, Jackson PF, Rassnick S, and Rhodes K, , et al. (2011) Overcoming the genotoxicity of a pyrrolidine substituted arylindenopyrimidine as a potent dual adenosine A(2A)/A(1) antagonist by minimizing bio- activation to an iminium ion reactive intermediate. Chem Res Toxicol 24:1012–1030.
Lim HK, Chen J, Sensenhauser C, Cook K, and Subrahmanyam V (2007) Metabolite identification by data-dependent accurate mass spectrometric analysis at resolving power of 60,000 in external calibration mode using an LTQ/Orbitrap. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21:1821–1832.
Nomura S, Sakamaki S, Hongu M, Kawanishi E, Koga Y, Sakamoto T, Yamamoto Y, Ueta K, Kimata H, and Nakayama K, et al. (2010) Discovery of canagliflozin, a novel C-glucoside with thiophene ring, as sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Med Chem 53:6355–6360.
Rosenstock J, Aggarwal N, Polidori D, Zhao Y, Arbit D, Usiskin K, Capuano G, and Canovatchel W; Canagliflozin DIA 2001 Study Group (2012) Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35:1232–1238.
Sha S, Devineni D, Ghosh A, Polidori D, Chien S, Wexler D, Shalayda K, Demarest K, and Rothenberg P (2011) Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2, dose dependently reduces calculated renal threshold for glucose excretion and increases urinary glucose excretion in healthy subjects. Diabetes Obes Metab 13:669–672.
Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, and Cowie CC (2013) The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Di- abetes Care 36:2271–2279.
Verbruggen A, Coenen HH, Deverre JR, Guilloteau D, Langstrom B, Salvadori PA, and Halldin C (2008) Guideline to regulations for radiopharmaceuticals in early phase clinical trials in the EU. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:2144–2151.
Wright EM, Hirayama BA, and Loo DF (2007) Active sugar transport in health and disease. J Intern Med 261:32–43.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Rao N. V. S. Mamidi, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1000 US Route 202, Raritan, NJ 08869. E-mail: smamidi1@its. jnj.com
916 Mamidi et al.
at A S
P E
T Journals on M
ay 18, 2021 dm
d.aspetjournals.org D
ow nloaded from
2_2013_Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin.pdf
ARTICLE
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial
F. J. Lavalle-González & A. Januszewicz & J. Davidson & C. Tong & R. Qiu & W. Canovatchel & G. Meininger
Received: 15 March 2013 /Accepted: 29 July 2013 /Published online: 13 September 2013 # The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract Aims/hypothesis The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin vs placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with background metformin. Methods This randomised, double-blind, four-arm, parallel- group, Phase 3 study was conducted at 169 centres in 22 countries between April 2010 and August 2012. Participants (N =1,284) with type 2 diabetes aged ≥18 and ≤80 years who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.0% [53 mmol/ mol] and ≤10.5% [91 mmol/mol]) on metformin therapy received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or placebo (n =368, 367, 366, 183, respectively) for a 26 week, placebo- and active-controlled period followed by a 26 week, active-controlled period (placebo group switched to sitagliptin [placebo/sitagliptin]) and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis set. Randomisation was performed using a computer-generated schedule; participants,
study centres and the sponsor were blinded to group assign- ment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26; secondary endpoints included changes in HbA1c (week 52) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP; weeks 26 and 52). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Results At week 26, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg re- duced HbA1c vs placebo (−0.79%, –0.94%, –0.17%, respec- tively; p <0.001). At week 52, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg demonstrated non-inferiority, and canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated statistical superiority, to sitagliptin in lowering HbA1c (−0.73%, –0.88%,–0.73%, respectively); differences (95% CI) vs sitagliptin were 0% (−0.12, 0.12) and −0.15% (−0.27, –0.03), respectively. Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26: –3.7%, –4.2%, –1.2%, respectively; p <0.001) and sitagliptin (week 52: –3.8%, –4.2%, –1.3%, respectively; p <0.001). Both canagliflozin doses reduced FPG and systolic BP vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) (p <0.001). Overall AE and AE-related discontinuation rates were gener- ally similar across groups, but higher with canagliflozin 100 mg. Genital mycotic infection and osmotic diuresis- related AE rates were higher with canagliflozin; few led to discontinuations. Hypoglycaemia incidence was higher with canagliflozin. Conclusions/interpretation Canagliflozin improved glycaemia and reduced body weight vs placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52) and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin. Clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106677 Funding This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Keywords Canagliflozin . Metformin . Sitagliptin .
Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor .
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
F. J. Lavalle-González (*) Endocrinology and Internal Medicine Department, Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León, Avenida Madero y Gonzalitos, S/N Col. Mitras Centro, 64460 Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico e-mail: [email protected]
A. Januszewicz Department of Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
J. Davidson Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
C. Tong: R. Qiu: W. Canovatchel: G. Meininger Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 DOI 10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1
Abbreviations AE Adverse event AHA Antihyperglycaemic agent ANCOVA Analysis of covariance DPP-4 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 eGFR Estimated GFR FPG Fasting plasma glucose IR Immediate release LOCF Last observation carried forward LS Least squares mITT Modified intent-to-treat MMTT Mixed-meal tolerance test PPG Postprandial glucose SGLT2 Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 SMBG Self-monitored blood glucose UGE Urinary glucose excretion UTI Urinary tract infection XR Extended release
Introduction
Metformin is the recommended first-line pharmacological therapy for type 2 diabetes but the progressive nature of the disease often necessitates more intensive treatment regimens or combination therapy for patients to achieve and/or maintain glycaemic control [1, 2]. Currently avail- able antihyperglycaemic agents (AHAs) have distinct risk/ benefit profiles, which must be considered when choosing an add-on therapy to metformin that meets the needs of each patient [2, 3]. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of AHAs that are becoming more commonly used as second agents [2, 4].
Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes [5–10]. Canagliflozin reduces blood glucose by lowering the renal threshold for glucose and increasing urinary glucose excretion (UGE), resulting in a mild osmotic diuresis and a net caloric loss. In a 12 week study, canagliflozin significantly improved glycaemic con- trol and reduced body weight vs placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin, with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia [5]. Other SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have also demonstrated efficacy in lowering HbA1c and body weight with a low risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes [11–14]. This 52 week Phase 3 study in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo at week 26 and sitagliptin at week 52.
Methods
Participants and study design
This randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active- controlled, Phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01106677) was conducted at 169 centres in 22 countries. The study consisted of a 2 week single-blind, placebo run-in period, a 26 week placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind treat- ment period (period I) followed by a 26 week active- controlled, double-blind treatment period (period II) and a 4 week follow-up period.
Eligible participants were men and women with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥18 and ≤80 years, who had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥7.0% [53 mmol/mol] and ≤10.5% [91 mmol/mol]) and who were on stable metformin therapy (≥2,000 mg/day [or ≥1,500 mg/day if unable to tolerate higher dose]) for ≥8 weeks and had fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <15 mmol/l at week−2 and fasting fingerstick glucose ≥6.1 mmol/l and <15 mmol/l on day 1. Participants on metfor- min immediate-release (IR) monotherapy at protocol-specified doses at screening directly entered the placebo run-in period. Those on metformin extended release (XR), metformin IR or XR at below protocol-specified doses or metformin plus sulfo- nylurea underwent a metformin IR dose titration/dose stable and, if applicable, a sulfonylurea washout period of up to 10 weeks, followed by the placebo run-in period.
The following exclusion criteria were applied: repeated FPG and/or fasting self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) ≥15.0 mmol/l during the pretreatment phase; history of type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular disease (including myocardial in- farction, unstable angina, revascularisation procedure or cere- brovascular accident) in the 3 months before screening or uncontrolled hypertension; treatment with a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist, insulin, another SGLT2 inhibitor or any other AHA (except metformin as monotherapy or in combination with a sulfonylurea) in the 12 weeks before screening; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <55 ml min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 (or <60 ml min−1
[1.73 m2]−1 if based upon restriction in local label) or serum creatinine ≥124 μmol/l (men) or ≥115 μmol/l (women).
The study was conducted in accordance with ethical prin- ciples that comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with Good Clinical Practices and applicable regu- latory requirements. The study protocol and amendments were approved by institutional review boards at participating institutions. All participants provided written informed con- sent before taking part in the study.
Randomisation and treatments
During the placebo run-in period, participants received single- blind placebo capsules matching study drug once daily.
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 2583
Participants were randomised to receive canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg or placebo (2:2:2:1) once daily for 26 weeks. The canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg once- daily doses were selected based on findings from a dose- ranging, Phase 2 study in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin [5]; a 300 mg twice-daily regimen provided only incremental benefits vs the once-daily regimen and was therefore not selected for further development. The use of placebo as a control for the 26 week core treatment period was done in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency regulatory guidelines [15, 16]. The computer-generated randomisation schedule was prepared by the sponsor before the study. Randomisation was balanced using permuted blocks of seven and stratified by whether a participant was on met- formin monotherapy or metformin plus sulfonylurea at screening. After randomisation, HbA1c and FPG values were masked to the study centres unless they met glycaemic rescue criteria. After completion of period I, the database was locked and the study was unblinded by the sponsor for regulatory filing; the participants and the study centre and local sponsor personnel remained blinded throughout period II.
Participants who completed period I then entered period II, during which those randomised to canagliflozin (100 or 300 mg) or sitagliptin 100 mg continued on those treatments while those randomised to placebo switched to sitagliptin 100 mg in a blinded fashion. During the double-blind treatment period, glycaemic rescue therapy with glimepiride (added to study drug and background metformin) was initiated if FPG >15.0 mmol/l after day 1 to week 6, >13.3 mmol/l after week 6 to week 12, and >11.1 mmol/l after week 12 to week 26. Glimepiride therapy was also started if HbA1c >8.0% (64 mmol/mol) after week 26.
Endpoints and assessments
The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26; change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 was a key, pre-specified secondary end- point. Other pre-specified secondary endpoints at week 26 were proportion of participants reaching HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), change in FPG, 2 h postprandial glucose (PPG) and systolic BP and per cent change in body weight, triacylglycerol (i.e. triglycerides) and HDL-cholesterol. All participants underwent a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) on day 1 and at week 26 for assessment of 2 h PPG. Change in Apo B was assessed in a subset of participants at week 26 based on availability of paired baseline and week 26 archive samples. Other pre-specified secondary endpoints at week 52 were change in FPG and systolic BP and per cent change in body weight, triacylglycerol and HDL-cholesterol.
Safety and tolerability were evaluated based on ad- verse event (AE) reports, safety laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, physical examinations, SMBG and 12-lead electrocardiograms. AEs pre-specified for addi- tional data collection included urinary tract infections (UTIs) and genital mycotic infections. Documented ep- isodes of hypoglycaemia included biochemically con- firmed episodes (concurrent fingerstick or plasma glucose ≤3.9 mmol/l) and/or severe episodes (i.e. requiring the assis- tance of another individual or resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness).
Statistical analyses
The primary hypothesis was that canagliflozin 300 mg is statistically superior to placebo in reducing HbA1c from base- line to week 26. Key secondary hypotheses were statistical superiority of canagliflozin 100 mg to placebo in HbA1c- lowering effect at week 26 and non-inferiority of canagliflozin 300 mg or both canagliflozin doses to sitagliptin 100 mg in reducing HbA1c from baseline to week 52. Primary efficacy analysis was performed in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (randomised participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug) using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Assuming a group difference of 0.5% (5.5 mmol/ mol) between canagliflozin and placebo and a common SD of 1.0% (10.9 mmol/mol) for change in HbA1c, and using a two-sample, two-sided t test with a type I error rate of 0.05, an estimated 86 participants per group were re- quired to achieve 90% power to demonstrate statistical superiority of canagliflozin to placebo. To support supe- riority and non-inferiority objectives for the primary end- point in the mITT population and for supportive analysis in the per-protocol population (mITT participants who com- pleted the study, did not receive rescue therapy and had no major protocol violations), an estimated 360 randomised par- ticipants were needed for each active treatment group and 180 for the placebo group, assuming a 35% discontinuation rate at week 52 and with a 2:2:2:1 randomisation ratio for canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg and placebo.
Primary efficacy analyses were performed in the mITT population according to randomised treatment assignment using LOCF to impute missing data; for participants who received rescue therapy, the last post-baseline value before rescue was used. Safety analyses were performed in the same population according to the predominant treatment received; in this study, the mITT and safety populations were identical. Only data from participants randomised to sitagliptin 100 mg on day 1 (i.e. not including participants who switched from placebo to sitagliptin at week 26) were included in efficacy comparisons at week 52. Safety analyses over 52 weeks in- cluded participants who received canagliflozin 100 mg or
2584 Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592
300 mg or sitagliptin and those who switched from placebo to sitagliptin after 26 weeks (placebo/sitagliptin group).
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treat- ment and stratification factor as fixed effects and correspond- ing baseline value as a covariate was used to assess primary and continuous secondary endpoints. Least squares (LS) mean differences between groups and two-sided 95% CIs were estimated. The categorical secondary endpoint was analysed with a logistic model with treatment and stratification factor as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. Assessment of non-inferiority of canagliflozin to sitagliptin was based on a pre-specified margin of 0.3% for the upper limit of the two- sided 95% CI for the comparison. If non-inferiority was demonstrated, then superiority was assessed based on an upper bound of the 95% CI around the between-group differences of <0.0%.
Comparisons were performed for canagliflozin vs placebo at week 26 and vs sitagliptin at week 52 based on pre- specified hierarchical testing sequences implemented to strongly control overall type I error due to multiplicity. At week 26, statistical tests were interpreted at a two-sided sig- nificance level of 5% for all endpoints except change in systolic BP, HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol. These were grouped together into two separate families (one each for canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg) and each family was tested using the Hochberg procedure at the 2.5% signifi- cance level. Comparisons of canagliflozin with sitagliptin at week 52 were initiated after statistical superiority of canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg to placebo in HbA1c lowering at week 26 was established; statistical tests at week 52 were interpreted at a two-sided significance level of 5% for all endpoints. The p values are reported for pre- specified comparisons only.
Results
Participant disposition and baseline characteristics
A total of 1,284 participants were randomised into period I and received ≥1 dose of study drug (mITT analysis set); of 1,119 participants who completed period I, 1,103 entered period II and 1,020 completed 52 weeks of treatment (Fig. 1). The rate of study discontinuation before week 52 was 19.0%, 18.5%, 22.1% and 24.6% with canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg, sitagliptin and placebo/ sitagliptin, respectively. Over 52 weeks, the percentage of participants who received glycaemic rescue therapy was 14.7%, 9.3%, 18.0% and 25.1% with canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg, sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin, respectively (OR [95% CI] with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg, respectively, of 0.78 [0.53, 1.16] and 0.46
[0.30, 0.72] vs sitagliptin, and 0.51 [0.33, 0.80] and 0.30 [0.19, 0.49] vs placebo/sitagliptin). Demographic and baseline characteristics were generally similar across groups (Table 1).
Effect on glycaemic variables
Week 26 (period I only) At week 26, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline compared with placebo (difference in LS mean changes of −0.62% and −0.77% [−6.8 and −8.4 mmol/mol], respectively; p <0.001 for both); the change in HbA1c with sitagliptin was −0.66% (−7.2 mmol/mol) relative to placebo (Fig. 2a; electronic sup- plementary material [ESM] Table 1). Statistical comparison of canagliflozin with sitagliptin at week 26 was not performed (not pre-specified). A greater proportion of participants treated with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) than with placebo (45.5%, 57.8% and 29.8%, respectively; p =0.000 for both); 54.5% of sitagliptin-treated participants achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol). Both canagliflozin doses significantly reduced FPG and 2 h PPG at week 26 vs placebo (p <0.001 for all; ESM Table 1); FPG and 2 h PPG were also reduced from baseline with sitagliptin.
Week 52 (periods I and II) At 52 weeks, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg demonstrated non-inferiority to sitagliptin 100 mg in HbA1c-lowering effect (upper limit of the 95% CI less than pre-specified margin of 0.3%; Fig. 2b, c; Table 2). Canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated statistical superiority to sitagliptin in HbA1c-lowering effect (upper limit of the 95% CI less than 0.0%). The difference in LS mean changes (95% CI) for canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg vs sitagliptin was 0% (−0.12, 0.12) or 0 mmol/mol (−1.3, 1.3) and −0.15% (−0.27, –0.03) or −1.6 mmol/mol (−3.0, –0.3), respectively. The separation in treatment effect between canagliflozin 300 mg and sitagliptin was observed starting at week 6 and continued through week 52. A higher proportion of participants treated with canagliflozin 300 mg achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) compared with those treated with canagliflozin 100 mg or sitagliptin (54.7%, 41.4% and 50.6%, respectively; OR [95% CI] of 1.28 [0.92, 1.76] and 0.66 [0.48, 0.91] with canagliflozin 300 mg and 100 mg vs sitagliptin). The proportion of participants reaching HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) was 26.9%, 21.9% and 24.9% for those treated with canagliflozin 300 mg, canagliflozin 100 mg and sitagliptin, respectively (OR 1.14 [0.80, 1.62] and 0.84 [0.59, 1.22], respectively). Over 52 weeks, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg provided greater reductions in FPG than sitagliptin (difference in LS mean changes of −0.5 and −1.0 mmol/l, respectively; p <0.001 for both; Fig. 2d; Table 2), with maximal reductions at 26 weeks across groups.
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 2585
Effect on body weight, BP and lipids
Week 26 (period I only) At week 26, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced body weight compared with placebo (p <0.001; ESM Table 1); body weight change was −1.2% with both sitagliptin and placebo. Both canagliflozin doses were associated with significant decreases vs placebo in systolic BP (p <0.001 for both; ESM Table 1). Reductions from baseline in diastolic BP were also observed with both canagliflozin doses. Sitagliptin was associated with decreases from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP.
Both canagliflozin doses significantly increased HDL- cholesterol compared with placebo at week 26 (p <0.001); no statistically significant changes in triacylglycerol were seen
with canagliflozin relative to placebo (ESM Table 1). Statisti- cal testing was not performed (not pre-specified) for other lipid variables, but 95% CIs for between-group comparisons in these variables are reported in ESM Table 1. Increases from baseline in LDL-cholesterol were seen with canagliflozin and placebo. In a subset of participants with adequate archived samples for analysis of Apo B (n =586), increases from base- line of 4.3%, 5.4% and 2.4% were seen with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg and placebo, respectively. Increases from baseline in triacylglycerol, HDL-cholesterol and LDL- cholesterol were observed with sitagliptin.
Week 52 (periods I and II) At week 52, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced body weight compared with
2,883 patients enrolled and screened
366 received SITA 100 mg
319 completed period I
322 completed period I
155 completed period I
323 completed period I
285 completed period II
298 completed period II
138 completed period II
183 in the mITT analysis set
(LOCF)
366 in the mITT analysis set
(LOCF)
368 in the mITT analysis set
(LOCF)
367 in the mITT analysis set
(LOCF)
299 completed period II
313 entered period II
b 316 entered
period II b
153 entered period II and
switched to SITA b
321 entered period II
b
368 received CANA 100 mg
183 received PBO
28 discontinued
7 adverse event
1 met creatinine or eGFR
1 lack of efficacy on
withdrawal criteria
rescue therapy
3 lost to follow-up
1 noncompliance
2 physician decision
5 withdrawal of consent
8 other
367 received CANA 300 mg
1,284 randomised a
47 discontinued
8 adverse event
3 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
3 lost to follow-up
1 physician decision
3 protocol violation
6 withdrawal of consent
23 other
46 discontinued
18 adverse event
2 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
1 lost to follow-up
3 noncompliance
1 physician decision
1 pregnancy
1 protocol violation
1 study terminated by sponsor
3 withdrawal of consent
1 product quality complaint
14 other
44 discontinued
6 adverse event
2 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
1 death
6 lost to follow-up
3 physician decision
2 study terminated by sponsor
15 withdrawal of consent
1 product quality complaint
8 other
15 discontinued
1 adverse event
2 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
rescue therapy
2 physician decision
1 protocol violation
1 withdrawal of consent
6 other
28 discontinued
9 adverse event
2 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
1 death
rescue therapy
2 lost to follow-up
3 physician decision
1 withdrawal of consent
1 unable to take rescue therapy
5 other
18 discontinued
1 adverse event
4 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
2 lost to follow-up
3 physician decision
3 withdrawal of consent
5 other
22 discontinued
5 adverse event
3 met creatinine or eGFR withdrawal criteria
2 lost to follow-up
2 physician decision
2 withdrawal of consent
8 other
P e rio
d II
P e rio
d I
2 lack of efficacy on
4 lack of efficacy on
Fig. 1 Study flow diagram. aAmong 2,883 patients enrolled and screened, there were 1,599 screen failures (inclusion/ exclusion criteria, n =1,428; withdrawal of consent, n =115; other, n =50; adverse event, n =6). bSome subjects withdrew from the study after completing period I and did not enter period II. CANA, canagliflozin; PBO, placebo; SITA, sitagliptin
2586 Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592
sitagliptin (Fig. 3, Table 2), with differences in LS mean per cent changes vs sitagliptin of −2.4% (−2.1 kg) and −2.9% (−2.5 kg), respectively (p <0.001 for both). Weight loss occurred most rapidly with canagliflozin up to week 6, with a continuing, slower decrease followed by an apparent plateau after week 34. A small, gradual decrease from baseline was observed with sitagliptin, which also plateaued after week 34.
Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly decreased systolic BP relative to sitagliptin at 52 weeks (difference in
LS mean changes of −2.9 and −4.0 mmHg, respectively; p <0.001 for both; Table 2). The change in diastolic BP from baseline was −1.8 mmHg with both canagliflozin doses and −0.3 mmHg with sitagliptin. No notable differences were observed across groups in changes in pulse rate (−1.3, –1.9 and −1.4 beats/min with canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg and sitagliptin, respectively).
At week 52, increases in triacylglycerol from baseline were seen with both canagliflozin doses, whereas a decrease was observed with sitagliptin; the difference between canagliflozin
Table 1 Baseline demographics and disease characteristics
Characteristic PBO/SITA (n =183) SITA 100 mg (n =366) CANA 100 mg (n =368) CANA 300 mg (n =367) Total (N =1,284)
Sex, n (%)
Male 94 (51.4) 172 (47.0) 174 (47.3) 165 (45.0) 605 (47.1)
Female 89 (48.6) 194 (53.0) 194 (52.7) 202 (55.0) 679 (52.9)
Age, years 55.3±9.8 55.5±9.6 55.5±9.4 55.3±9.2 55.4±9.4
Race, n (%)
White 129 (70.5) 264 (72.1) 252 (68.5) 256 (69.8) 901 (70.2)
Black or African-American 3 (1.6) 13 (3.6) 16 (4.3) 13 (3.5) 45 (3.5)
Asian 30 (16.4) 41 (11.2) 51 (13.9) 60 (16.3) 182 (14.2)
Othera 21 (11.5) 48 (13.1) 49 (13.3) 38 (10.4) 156 (12.1)
HbA1c, % (mmol/mol) 8.0±0.9 (64±9.8) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8)
FPG, mmol/l 9.1±2.1 9.4±2.3 9.3±2.3 9.6±2.5 9.4±2.3
Body weight, kg 86.6±22.4 87.7±21.6 88.8±22.2 85.4±20.9 87.2±21.7
BMI, kg/m2 31.1±6.1 32.0±6.1 32.4±6.4 31.4±6.3 31.8±6.2
Duration of diabetes, years 6.8±5.3 6.8±5.2 6.7±5.4 7.1±5.4 6.9±5.3
Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated a Includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, multiple and other
CANA, canagliflozin; PBO, placebo; SITA, sitagliptin
Time point (weeks)
L S
m e a n c
h a n g e in
H b A
1 c
fr o m
b a se
lin e (
% )
a
–1.2
–1.0
–0.6
–0.4
0
0.2
–0.8
–0.2
–1.2
–1.0
–0.6
–0.4
–0.2
0
–0.8
Time point (weeks)
L S
m e a n c
h a n g e in
H b A
1 c
fr o m
b a se
lin e (
% )
b
6.8
7.0
7.4
7.6
7.8
8.0
7.2
Time point (weeks)
M e a n H
b A
1 c
(% )
c
Time point (weeks)
L S
m e a n c
h a n g e in
F P
G fr
o m
b a se
lin e (
m m
o l/l
)
0 6 12 18 26 0 6 12 18 26 34 42 52
0 6 12 18 26 34 42 52 0 6 12 18 26 34 42 52
d
–2.5
–2.0
–1.5
–1.0
–0.5
0
Fig. 2 Changes in glycaemic variables (LOCF). (a) Change in HbA1c at week 26, (b) change in HbA1c at week 52, (c) mean HbA1c over time and (d) change in FPG at week 52. CANA, canagliflozin; PBO, placebo; SITA, sitagliptin. Light-grey triangles, PBO; white diamonds, SITA 100 mg; dark-grey squares, CANA 100 mg; black circles, CANA 300 mg. Error bars show SE. To convert values for HbA1c in % into mmol/mol, subtract 2.15 and multiply by 10.929 or use the conversion calculator at www.HbA1c.nu/eng/
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 2587
Table 2 Summary of efficacy findings at week 52 (LOCF)
Variable SITA 100 mg (n =366) CANA 100 mg (n =368) CANA 300 mg (n =367)
HbA1c, n 354 365 360
Mean ± SD baseline, % (mmol/mol) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8) 7.9±0.9 (63±9.8) 8.0±0.9 (64±9.8)
LS mean ± SE change, % (mmol/mol) −0.73±0.05 (−8.0±0.5) −0.73±0.05 (−8.0±0.5) −0.88±0.05 (−9.6±0.5)
Difference vs SITA (95% CI), % 0.00 (−0.12, 0.12) −0.15 (−0.27, –0.03)
Difference vs SITA (95% CI), mmol/mol 0.0 (−1.3, 1.3) −1.6 (−3.0, –0.3)
FPG, n 354 365 360
Mean ± SD baseline, mmol/l 9.4±2.3 9.4±2.3 9.6±2.5
LS mean ± SE change −1.0±0.1 −1.5±0.1 −2.0±0.1
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) −0.5 (−0.7, –0.2)a −1.0 (−1.2, –0.7)a
Body weight, n 355 365 360
Mean ± SD baseline, kg 87.6±20.9 88.7±22.3 85.4±20.7
LS mean ± SE change, kg −1.2±0.2 −3.3±0.2 −3.7±0.2
LS mean ± SE per cent change −1.3±0.2 −3.8±0.2 −4.2±0.2
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) −2.4 (−3.0, –1.8)a −2.9 (−3.4, –2.3)a
Systolic BP, n 355 365 360
Mean ± SD baseline, mmHg 128.0±13.5 128.0±12.7 128.7±13.0
LS mean ± SE change −0.7±0.6 −3.5±0.6 −4.7±0.6
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) −2.9 (−4.5, –1.3)a −4.0 (−5.6, –2.4)a
Diastolic BP, n 355 365 360
Mean ± SD baseline, mmHg 77.5±8.0 77.7±8.4 77.9±8.3
LS mean ± SE change −0.3±0.4 −1.8±0.4 −1.8±0.4
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) −1.4 (−2.4, –0.5)b −1.5 (−2.5, –0.5)b
Triacylglycerol, n 339 359 343
Mean ± SD baseline, mmol/l 2.0±1.1 2.2±1.6 2.1±1.5
LS mean ± SE change −0.15±0.05 −0.12±0.05 −0.19±0.05
Median (IQR) per cent change −3.3 (−22.8, 16.7) −2.7 (−28.4, 22.5) −8.7 (−29.1, 23.3)
LS mean ± SE per cent change −0.4±2.5 1.9±2.4 2.8±2.4
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) 2.3 (−3.9, 8.5)c 3.2 (−3.1, 9.5)c
LDL-cholesterol, n 338 358 343
Mean ± SD baseline, mmol/l 2.8±0.9 2.8±0.8 2.8±0.9
LS mean ± SE change 0.08±0.04 0.11±0.04 0.11±0.04
Median (IQR) per cent change 0.9 (−9.6, 16.8) 6.0 (−9.9, 21.8) 5.3 (−8.8, 22.6)
LS mean ± SE per cent change 6.0±1.8 7.7±1.7 8.8±1.8
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) 1.7 (−2.8, 6.2)b 2.8 (−1.8, 7.4)b
HDL-cholesterol, n 338 359 343
Mean ± SD baseline, mmol/l 1.2±0.3 1.2±0.3 1.2±0.3
LS mean ± SE change 0.06±0.01 0.12±0.01 0.14±0.01
Median (IQR) per cent change 4.4 (−4.0, 14.8) 8.0 (0.0, 19.8) 11.1 (0.0, 22.8)
LS mean ± SE per cent change 6.0±1.1 11.2±1.0 13.2±1.1
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) 5.2 (2.5, 7.9)d 7.2 (4.4, 10.0)d
LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol, n 338 358 343
Mean ± SD baseline, mol/mol 2.6±1.0 2.5±0.9 2.4±0.9
LS mean ± SE change −0.04±0.04 −0.13±0.04 −0.15±0.04
Median (IQR) per cent change −1.7 (−14.1, 14.6) −5.3 (−19.3, 11.7) −4.3 (−18.1, 13.2)
LS mean ± SE per cent change 1.6±1.8 −0.8±1.8 −1.3±1.8
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) −2.4 (−7.1, 2.2)b −2.9 (−7.6, 1.8)b
Non-HDL-cholesterol, n 337 357 340
Mean ± SD baseline, mmol/l 3.7±1.0 3.8±1.1 3.7±1.0
LS mean ± SE change 0.03±0.05 0.04±0.05 0.05±0.05
2588 Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592
and sitagliptin did not reach statistical significance (Table 2). Median per cent decreases in triacylglycerol were observed across all groups. Both canagliflozin doses increased HDL- cholesterol, but statistical comparison of canagliflozin vs sitagliptin was not performed due to the hierarchical statistical testing sequence. Statistical testing was not performed (not pre-specified) for other lipid variables, but 95% CIs for between-group comparisons in these variables are reported in Table 2. The 100 mg and 300 mg dosages of canagliflozin were associated with increases from baseline in LDL- cholesterol and increases in non-HDL-cholesterol that were smaller than those in LDL-cholesterol. Decreases from base- line in the LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio were ob- served with both canagliflozin doses, whereas an increase was seen with sitagliptin.
Safety and tolerability
Overall incidences of AEs and AE-related discontinuations were generally comparable across groups over 52 weeks, with slightly higher incidences in the group receiving canagliflozin 100 mg (Table 3). The higher incidence of AE-related discon- tinuations with canagliflozin 100 mg was not due to an in- crease in any specific AE. The incidence of AEs related to the study drug was higher with canagliflozin and sitagliptin than with placebo/sitagliptin; the incidence of serious AEs was low and similar across groups. The overall incidence of AEs that occurred in period II was similar across groups; the incidence of AEs related to study drug in period II was higher with canagliflozin and sitagliptin than with placebo/sitagliptin (ESM Table 2). During period II, the incidence of AEs leading to discontinuation was higher in the sitagliptin group than in the other groups, as was the incidence of serious AEs.
Over 52 weeks, canagliflozin was associated with a higher incidence of genital mycotic infections in men and women. These were generally mild or moderate in intensity and led to few discontinuations; most (∼80%) were reported during the first 26 weeks. The incidence of UTIs was similar across
groups over 52 weeks. A higher incidence of AEs related to osmotic diuresis (i.e. pollakiuria [increased urine frequency], polyuria [increased urine volume]) was seen with canagliflozin vs sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin; most were mild in sever- ity and infrequently led to discontinuation. The incidence of AEs related to reduced intravascular volume (i.e. postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension) was low across groups; events with canagliflozin were mild to moderate in severity and none led to discontinuation.
The proportion of participants with documented epi- sodes of hypoglycaemia over 52 weeks was 6.8% with both canagliflozin doses, 4.1% with sitagliptin and 2.7% with placebo/sitagliptin. One participant each receiving canagliflozin 100 mg and sitagliptin experienced a severe hypoglycaemic event. During weeks 26–52 (period II), the incidence of documented hypoglycaemia was similar with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg and sitagliptin (4.2%, 5.0% and 4.7%, respectively) and was higher than with placebo/sitagliptin (1.6%).
Over 52 weeks, decreases in alanine aminotransferase were observed with canagliflozin, whereas increases were seen with sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin (Table 4). Canagliflozin was associated with increased bilirubin, whereas decreases were seen with sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin. Increases in se- rum creatinine were observed across groups, being of a lower
Table 2 (continued)
Variable SITA 100 mg (n =366) CANA 100 mg (n =368) CANA 300 mg (n =367)
Median (IQR) per cent change 1.9 (−9.7, 13.7) 2.4 (−8.8, 14.8) 2.8 (−8.3, 18.8)
LS mean ± SE per cent change 2.8±1.4 3.8±1.3 4.0±1.4
Difference vs SITA (95% CI) 0.9 (−2.6, 4.4)b 1.1 (−2.4, 4.7)b
a p <0.001 vs SITA b Statistical comparison vs SITA not performed (not pre-specified) c p =NS vs SITA d Statistical comparison vs SITA not performed due to multiplicity control
CANA, canagliflozin; IQR, interquartile range; SITA, sitagliptin
Time point (weeks)
L S
m e a n %
c h a n g e
in b
o d y
w e ig
h t fr
o m
b a se
lin e
0 6 12 18 26 34 42 52 –5.0
–4.0
–3.0
–2.0
–1.0
0
Fig. 3 Per cent change in body weight (LOCF). CANA, canagliflozin; SITA, sitagliptin. White diamonds, SITA 100 mg; dark-grey squares, CANA 100 mg; black circles, CANA 300 mg. Error bars show SE
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 2589
magnitude with canagliflozin than with sitagliptin or placebo/ sitagliptin. All groups showed a reduction in eGFR. This reduction was observed by week 6 with canagliflozin and trended back toward baseline over time; eGFR progressively decreased with sitagliptin through week 18, followed by a small improvement. An increase in blood urea nitrogen was seen with canagliflozin vs sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin. Canagliflozin was associated with a decrease in serum urate, whereas an increase was seen with sitagliptin and placebo/ sitagliptin. An increase in haemoglobin was seen with canagliflozin, whereas sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin were associated with decreased haemoglobin.
Discussion
Patients with type 2 diabetes often require combination ther- apies to achieve and/or maintain effective glycaemic control [1, 2]. In this study of patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin, canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline compared with placebo at week 26 and demonstrated non-inferiority to sitagliptin 100 mg in HbA1c-lowering effect at week 52; canagliflozin 300 mg also showed statistical superiority to sitagliptin in HbA1c-lowering effect. Significant decreases in FPG, body weight and systolic BP were seen with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg vs placebo at week 26 and sitagliptin at week 52, with a sustained effect over 52 weeks. The 100 mg and 300 mg dosages of canagliflozin were associated with significant increases in HDL-cholesterol vs placebo at week 26, with increases from baseline also observed at week 52.
Increases from baseline in LDL-cholesterol were observed with canagliflozin and sitagliptin, with similar per cent changes at weeks 26 and 52. The mechanism of LDL- cholesterol increase with canagliflozin is unknown, but may reflect downstream metabolic effects of UGE and modest haemoconcentration resulting from an osmotic diuretic effect [17]. Increases from baseline in non-HDL-cholesterol, which were smaller than those in LDL-cholesterol, were seen with canagliflozin and sitagliptin at weeks 26 and 52.
The safety and tolerability profile of canagliflozin was consistent with findings from previous Phase 3 studies [6, 8, 9]. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated, with a pattern of specific AEs (e.g. genital mycotic infections, osmotic diuresis-related AEs) that were generally mild or moderate in severity, occurred at a low incidence and infrequently led to discontinuation. The incidence of documented hypoglycaemia was low but was slightly higher with canagliflozin than with sitagliptin or placebo/sitagliptin. While the incidence of UTIs was similar with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg and the control groups (i.e. sitagliptin and placebo/sitagliptin) in the current study, a small increase in the incidence of UTIs was observed with canagliflozin 100 mg (5.9%) compared with canagliflozin 300 mg and placebo (4.3% and 4.0%, respective- ly) in a pooled analysis across four placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies [18]. The slight imbalance in overall AE incidence with canagliflozin 100 mg vs 300 mg was primarily driven by early events during period I; AE rates were more balanced during period II. In all groups except canagliflozin 300 mg, the inci- dence of AEs leading to discontinuation increased from week 26 to week 52; incidences were generally lower during period II relative to the entire 52 week period.
The results of the current study complement and support findings from a similar 52 week, Phase 3 study comparing canagliflozin 300 mg with sitagliptin 100 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin plus sulfonylurea [8]. In that study, canagliflozin 300 mg
Table 3 Summary of overall safety and selected AEs over 52 weeks
AE No. (%) of participants
PBO/SITA (n =183)
SITA 100 mg (n =366)
CANA 100 mg (n =368)
CANA 300 mg (n =367)
Any AE 122 (66.7) 236 (64.5) 266 (72.3) 230 (62.7)
AEs leading to discontinuation
8 (4.4) 16 (4.4) 19 (5.2) 12 (3.3)
AEs related to study druga
23 (12.6) 72 (19.7) 97 (26.4) 73 (19.9)
Serious AEs 7 (3.8) 18 (4.9) 15 (4.1) 12 (3.3)
Deaths 1 (0.5) 1 (0.3) 0 1 (0.3)
Selected AEs
UTI 12 (6.6) 23 (6.3) 29 (7.9) 18 (4.9)
Genital mycotic infection
Menb,c 1 (1.1) 2 (1.2) 9 (5.2) 4 (2.4)
Womend,e 1 (1.1) 5 (2.6) 22 (11.3) 20 (9.9)
Osmotic diuresis-related AEs
Pollakiuriaf 1 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 21 (5.7) 11 (3.0)
Polyuriag 0 0 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5)
Volume-related AEs
Postural dizziness
1 (0.5) 1 (0.3) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5)
Orthostatic hypotension
0 0 0 1 (0.3)
All AEs are reported, regardless of rescue medication a Possibly, probably or very likely related to study drug, as assessed by investigators b PBO/SITA, n =94; SITA 100 mg, n =172; CANA 100 mg, n =174; CANA 300 mg, n =165 c Including balanitis, balanoposthitis and fungal genital infection d PBO/SITA, n =89; SITA 100 mg, n =194; CANA 100 mg, n =194; CANA 300 mg, n =202 e Including vaginal infection, vaginal inflammation, vulvitis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, vulvovaginal mycotic infection and vulvovaginitis f Increased urine frequency g Increased urine volume
CANA, canagliflozin; PBO, placebo; SITA, sitagliptin
2590 Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592
demonstrated non-inferiority and statistical superiority to sitagliptin in HbA1c-lowering effect at 52 weeks (difference in LS mean changes of −0.37% [−4.0 mmol/mol]). Greater reduction in body weight was observed with canagliflozin relative to sitagliptin (difference of −2.8% [−2.4 kg]); reductions in FPG and systolic BP were also seen with canagliflozin vs sitagliptin. Overall AE incidence was similar with canagliflozin and sitagliptin but the incidence of genital mycotic infection and osmotic diuresis-related AEs was higher with canagliflozin. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar with canagliflozin and sitagliptin but was higher than that observed in the current study, which is likely related to the additional sulfonylurea treatment in the previous study. Together with these previous results, the current findings provide additional evidence supporting the non-inferiority of canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg, and statistical superiority of canagliflozin 300 mg, to sitagliptin in HbA1c-lowering effect in patients with inadequate glycaemic control with their ongoing AHA therapy. Improvements in glycaemic con- trol have also been observed with other SGLT2 inhibitors, and safety findings with canagliflozin in the current study were generally consistent with those seen with other SGLT2 inhibitors [11–14].
The current study is strengthened by its placebo- and active-controlled design, allowing for comparison of canagliflozin with placebo (week 26) and sitagliptin (week 52). The study population reflects a typical profile of patients with type 2 diabetes (e.g. broad age range, mostly overweight/ obese, wide range of racial/ethnic groups); thus, study results should be generalisable to a broad type 2 diabetes population. This study has several potential limitations. It was designed with pre-specified comparisons between canagliflozin and sitagliptin only at week 52, consistent with the assessment time point commonly used in other active-controlled studies [8, 19, 20]; therefore, statistical comparisons of canagliflozin with sitagliptin at week 26 are not reported. Because type 2 diabetes is a chronic disorder, study durations beyond 52 weeks may better define the long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin. Studies comparing canagliflozin with other AHAs would also be useful for determining the relative efficacy/safety of canagliflozin as add-on therapy.
In summary, treatment with canagliflozin improved glycaemic control and reduced body weight compared with placebo over 26 weeks and with sitagliptin over 52 weeks and was generally well tolerated in patients whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.
Table 4 Summary of clinical laboratory variables at baseline and week 52
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CANA, canagliflozin; PBO, placebo; SITA, sitagliptin
Variable PBO/SITA SITA 100 mg
CANA 100 mg
CANA 300 mg
ALT, n 137 282 294 293
Mean baseline, μkat/l 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Mean ± SD per cent change 7.1±40.7 5.1±41.6 −2.2±39.9 −10.2±39.6
AST, n 137 281 292 293
Mean baseline, μkat/l 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Mean ± SD per cent change 9.8±31.8 7.1±36.8 2.6±32.6 −2.4±28.9
Bilirubin, n 138 282 296 293
Mean baseline, μmol/l 9.1 8.7 9.0 8.5
Mean ± SD per cent change −3.9±31.4 −1.3±33.4 11.6±45.6 14.3±41.1
BUN, n 139 282 296 295
Mean baseline, mmol/l 5.4 5.5 5.1 5.2
Mean ± SD per cent change 5.9±33.8 3.5±26.6 14.8±26.7 16.1±33.4
Creatinine, n 139 282 296 295
Mean baseline, μmol/l 73.9 72.0 71.4 70.2
Mean ± SD per cent change 3.3±18.0 3.4±13.6 2.3±11.4 2.5±12.4
eGFR, n 139 282 296 295
Mean baseline, ml min−1 (1.73 m2)−1 87.7 89.1 89.7 90.2
Mean ± SD per cent change −1.4±18.2 −2.4±12.8 −1.4±12.8 −1.5±12.9
Urate, n 139 282 296 295
Mean baseline, μmol/l 333.4 328.8 316.6 311.2
Mean ± SD per cent change 5.0±17.4 3.9±18.4 −10.5±18.3 −11.0±18.8
Haemoglobin, n 134 277 292 285
Mean baseline, g/l 141.3 141.0 140.5 140.0
Mean ± SD per cent change −1.6±6.0 −1.6±6.2 4.0±7.2 3.7±7.1
Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592 2591
These findings support the clinical usefulness of canagliflozin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Acknowledgements The authors thank all investigators, study teams and patients for participating in this study. The authors acknowledge Felicity Schaeffer of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, for her assistance and contribution to the clinical management, data review and preparation of the study report. Editorial support was provided by Lisa Shannon of MedErgy, and was funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC. Canagliflozin has been developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.
This study was previously presented, in part, in abstract form at the 48th Annual Meeting of the German Diabetes Association, Leipzig, Germany, 8–11 May, 2013 and at the 73rd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 21–25 June 2013.
Funding This study was supported by Janssen Research & Develop- ment, LLC.
Duality of interest FJL-G has served on advisory boards for Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Bristol- Myers Squibb/AstraZeneca and Takeda, has participated in speaker bu- reaus for Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb/AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Silanes and Novartis, and has received research support from Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis and Novo Nordisk. AJ has received research support from Janssen. JD has served on advisory boards for Johnson and Johnson and Janssen. CT, RQ, WC and GM are full-time employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Contribution statement FJL-G, AJ, JD, RQ, WC and GM contributed to the design and conduct of the study and the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and also drafted, reviewed and approved the manuscript. CT contributed to the study design and the analysis and interpretation of data and drafted, reviewed and approved the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, pro- vided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
References
1. American Diabetes Association (2012) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care 35:S11–S63
2. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB et al (2012) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 55:1577–1596, Erratum in 56:680
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) Type 2 diabetes: newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes. NICE short clinical guideline 87. NICE, London
4. Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, Matthews DR, Tsapas A (2012) Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 344:e1369
5. Rosenstock J, Aggarwal N, Polidori D et al (2012) Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35: 1232–1238
6. Stenlof K, Cefalu WT, Kim K-A et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:372–382
7. Yale JF, Bakris G, Cariou B et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:463–473
8. Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J et al (2013) Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week, randomized trial. Diabetes Care 36:2508–2515
9. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon K-H et al (2013) Canagliflozin pro- motes body weight loss compared with glimepiride while providing glycaemic efficacy in subjects with type 2 diabetes on background metformin: 52-week findings from a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2
10. Bode B, Stenlof K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K (2013) Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in older subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract 41:72–84
11. Bailey CJ, Gross JL, Pieters A, Bastien A, List JF (2010) Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375:2223–2233
12. Bailey CJ, Gross JL, Hennicken D, Iqbal N, Mansfield TA, List JF (2013) Dapagliflozin add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes inade- quately controlled with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 102-week trial. BMC Med 11:43
13. Ferrannini E, Ramos SJ, Salsali A, Tang W, List JF (2010) Dapagliflozin monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients with inad- equate glycemic control by diet and exercise: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Diabetes Care 33:2217–2224
14. Ferrannini E, Seman L, Seewaldt-Becker E, Hantel S, Pinnetti S, Woerle HJ (2013) A phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 15:721–728
15. Food and Drug Administration (2008) Guidance for industry. Diabe- tes mellitus: developing drugs and therapeutic biologics for treatment and prevention. FDA, Rockville, MD
16. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2012) Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus. CPMP/EWP/1080/00 Rev. 1. EMA, London
17. Weidmann P, de Courten M, Ferrari P (1992) Effect of diuretics on the plasma lipid profile. Eur Heart J 13(Suppl G):61–67
18. Nicolle LE, Capuano G, Fung A, Usiskin K (2013) Urinary tract infection (UTI) with canagliflozin (CANA) in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Diabetes 62:A296 (Abstract)
19. Nauck MA, Meininger G, Sheng D, Terranella L, Stein PP (2007) Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in pa- tients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metfor- min alone: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 9:194–205
20. Nauck MA, del Prato S, Meier JJ et al (2011) Dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin: a randomized, 52-week, double-blind, active-controlled noninferiority trial. Diabetes Care 34:2015–2022
2592 Diabetologia (2013) 56:2582–2592
- Efficacy...
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Participants and study design
- Randomisation and treatments
- Endpoints and assessments
- Statistical analyses
- Results
- Participant disposition and baseline characteristics
- Effect on glycaemic variables
- Effect on body weight, BP and lipids
- Safety and tolerability
- Discussion
- References