I have assignment in leadership class
LDR 160: Leadership Around the World
Northern Geography
Six Time Zones
Mountains, Prairies, and Frozen land
Three Founding Cultures
English
French
First Nations (Native Peoples)
Complex Constitutional Democracy
Large country, which if often inhospitable Touches on three oceans Challenging to live within its geographical
borers Fur traders crossed much of the land
historically with the help from the First Nations peoples
It is important to have good transformation since the land is so vast and the communities so isolated
Myths of the settlers Both the British and the French were settlers Multiple cultures led the way to diversity appreciation
in the country Varies cultural pockets throughout the country
Myths of the natives There are dozens of First Nations peoples Communities are centered around connection to the
land- fishing in the west, hunting in the plains Also Inuit (Artic culture) people in Canada- these are
most isolated and also struggle to maintain identity Native peoples (like in US) often overlooked
Myths in art, song, and story Reflect the challenges of the land, transportation, and
cultural traditions
The importance of the creation of the railway- particularly the role of Chinese workers
Canadian Broadcast Corporation links the cultures in their news and multi-language broadcasts
Myths of winter and sport Importance of winter sports, particularly hockey
Curling- embraced Canadian self-discipline, persistence, and cooperation
One of the oldest constitutions Despite differences there has been limited civil strife
or violent occurrences Known as a peaceful and peacekeeping nation Canada, though is still known for its cultural and
geographic divisions- balancing act between country and regions
Canadians are individualists, but with a collective nature- therefore focus on the importance of quality of life for each and all
Belief that all should be involved in governing Based on this, how is Canada different than the US?
Canadian leaders are complex in their definitions, but the following categories have emerged
Contingent Leadership Cooperation and accommodation
▪ Accommodation: Two separate languages and school systems ▪ Cooperation: Development of communication and trade
Pragmatism: Working toward common-sense solutions to problems- Blackberry communications
Socialized Power Focus on a positive influence on others and making a
difference in the world Examples: Universal healthcare and Canadians as
peacekeepers
Transformational Leadership Inspiring and empowering followers
Pragmatic and nurturing nature tends to be more transformational
Canadian culture includes transformational characteristics like: ▪ Inspirational motivation- free trade with US
▪ Idealized influence- preventing domestic terrorism
▪ Intellectual stimulation- better educated and ethics of Canadian auto workers
▪ Individual consideration- flexible work schedules
Participative Leadership Pluralist (diverse) society ensures leadership for and
with diverse peoples Respect of followers in important Maintain individual motivations, but still also
prioritize the importance of the group Canadian leaders are often non-heroic
How do the leadership traditions of Canada
differ from those of America? What in the mythology of Canada might contribute to those differences?
Common practices in Canadian Leadership: Emphasis on inclusion Good process skills- teamwork, negotiation, etc. Strong sense of principles, values, professionalism,
diversity, and peace through integration These practices enable Canadians leaders to:
Lead complex situations Lead with humility Be adaptable and have an open mind Be useful in international situations- especially
women
Common misperceptions of Canadian leaders: They are not aggressive, confident, or strong enough to be
effective
They are simplistic and unable to handle difficult situations because the country has never had internal conflict
Blind spots for Canadian leaders include: Inability to lead those who want a directive leader
Lack of preparedness for the cruelty or the world Based on these global implications, in what types of
situations might Canadian leaders be beneficial? In what types of situations might they struggle?
Canadians leaders are: Fairly easy to work with because they are unassuming,
moderate, and able to deal well with diverse peoples and perspectives
Focused on compromise, cooperation, and accommodation
Humble and believe in empowerment Intellectual motivators Team players, but still maintain their identity Often focused on moral and ethical issues
An example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ4GBpN2PCs
How does Mike Pratt epitomize Canadian leadership?
This section focuses on those countries: Settled by the British That speak English
Some points are applicable to the French, Dutch, and Spanish speaking and settled islands
Important to understand Island History Myth of African magical and Christian beliefs Myth behind African Anancy stories Connection of these to leadership
While there are varying cultural differences between the islands, there are many similarities
Majority of residents are descendants of African slaves,
Minority of residents are: Descendants of European colonizers
Descendants of Indian or Chinese indentured servants Indigenous peoples were wiped out during
colonization Culture comes from African traditions
suppressed under European control not from the indigenous cultures
Main industry was the sugar plantation, the labor for these plantations came from: Slavery until abolished Indentured servants from India and Chinese
Despite ending of forced forms of labor class system remains in place with whites having more power
These power struggles led to a movement away from colonization and independence beginning in the 1950s
Currently there is a good deal of intermarriage and cultural mixing and the standard of living is fairly good
Current challenge includes how small islands can compete with larger nations in the globalized world
African Traditional Magical Beliefs African slaves brought religious traditions with them
that still have power today (despite colonizers trying to outlaw them) ▪ Voodoo- Primarily in Haiti
▪ Obeah- Primarily in the English speaking islands
Based on magic and power in the supernatural ▪ Headed by an individual with access to the magical world ▪ Can work for good or evil for those who seek their help
▪ Operate through keeping their knowledge secret
Are often now combined with Christian practices
African Traditional Magical Beliefs
Lessons related to Leadership
▪ Based on these traditional systems, leadership would appear to be based on the power of the boss and the reliance of them by followers
▪ Similar to the colonization system where the power only lies with the elite or those “in the know”
▪ Reflective of a typical hierarchical approach
Mythical Stories of Anancy
Stories brought from West African and passed through the generations
About a spider who was known as a trickster who could change forms but everyone liked him (similar to American stories of the Brer Rabbit and Fox)
Leadership lesson: Ingenuity and trickery can provide success against those in power
An Anancy story: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFnOCCq0y-w
Theory X Leadership
Authoritarian and hierarchical
Could be seen as benevolent- the leader is supposed to care for their subordinates in exchange for their loyalty and obedience
Reliance on someone at the top for decision- making and power
Cultural Values (Hofstede and Purnett) High on individualism and collectivism- likes both
individual and group interactions
Low on hierarchy- prefers equity in power ▪ Surprising given traditional norms and leadership
tendencies
▪ This does play true with the notions on Anancy though
▪ Perhaps leaders should be aware of the trickster and become more participative
Prefers certainty and thinking things through
Collectivism/Individualism People of the Caribbean should be able to work in a
wide variety of contexts They can be individuals, but also work well in teams It is important to know these differences as a leader,
but also be aware of the trickster among your followers
Uncertainty Avoidance People like to be certain of things and appreciate
security and stability Leaders should let followers know their expectations
but expect a bit of uncertainty with the trickster
Power Distance People would like to be included in decision making and value
open communication and trust Leaders should delegate and seek input from their followers but
be aware of those who may be trying for their own gain There is a disconnect between what is desired in Caribbean
leaders and typical leadership practices ▪ The hierarchical style is actually against cultural norms and desires (a
throw back to colonization) ▪ Poor leadership and poor workers are symptoms of each other and
create a vicious cycle ▪ A challenge would be to break this cycle and establish new methods of
a leader/follower dynamic Overall, leaders must consider change in the power
distance dynamic and how this might materialize