Policy Issue and Solution:
Policy Issue and Solution Final Paper Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content (70%) |
Advanced 92-100% |
Proficient 84-91% |
Developing 1-83% |
Not present |
Total |
|
Content |
38.5 to 42 points: The following elements were outlined with final content for each element: · Identified a criminal justice policy issue. · Discussed the problem from the point of view of an advisor for the chief of police, sheriff, or federal department head. · Discussed the significance of the problem and why the issue is significant; what is being done by other departments or agencies, what law is applicable, and any other issues that can be identified as significant was provided. · Proposed a solution. The solution involved a minimum of 3 choices: do nothing, incremental approach, and full implementation; and includes sub-themes.
|
35.5 to 38 points: The elements are included but more content is needed.
· Information is provided on the criminal justice policy issue selected to some depth. · The problem addressed from the point of view as an advisor for the chief of police, sheriff, or federal department head needed additional detail. · The significance of the problem is provided with limited analysis. · The solution proposed was valid, however, the solution needed additional insight.
|
1 to 35 points: · The elements are not adequately included. Information and analysis was missing on the criminal justice policy issue that was selected. · The problem was not adequately addressed. · The significance of the problem was not fully assessed, and an adequate solution was not provided.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Research |
38.5 to 42 points: At least 12 peer reviewed/scholarly references are included in addition to the class textbooks and the Bible. A minimum of 8 references were recent peer reviewed sources published within the last five years. |
Quality is lacking but references are academic. A total of 6-11 peer reviewed/scholarly references are included. Nearly 8 references were recent peer reviewed sources published within the last five years. |
1 to 35 points: Academic quality is lacking. Peer reviewed/scholarly references are not adequately included. Less than 6 peer reviewed/scholarly references are included, and less than 6 references were recent peer reviewed sources published within the last five years.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Research Engagement |
32.5 to 35 points: Provides evidence of integrated research and critical thinking. |
29.5 to 32 points: References are integrated, and critical thinking demonstrated for the most part.
|
1 to 29 points: References are not adequately integrated.
More evidence of critical thinking needed.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Christian Worldview |
32.5 to 35 points: The section relating how a Christian worldview does or may change potential proposed solutions was fully assessed.
|
29.5 to 32 points: The section relating how a Christian worldview does or may change potential proposed solutions assessed on a limited basis, but further analysis was needed.
|
1 to 29 points: The section relating how a Christian worldview does or may change potential proposed solutions was too vague and was only 1-2 sentences in length.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Structure (30%) |
Advanced 92-100% |
Proficient 84-91% |
Developing 1-83% |
Not present |
Total |
|
APA |
22.5 to 24 points: Academic/scholarly sources are referenced and cited appropriately. Level 1 headings for the Problem, Significance, and Solution were used. Subthemes of the solution section contained APA Level 2 headings or beyond. In-text references and the reference page were error free.
|
20.5 to 22 points: Some errors in APA were noted. Level 1 headings for the Problem, Significance, and Solution were mostly formatted correctly. In-text references and the reference page contained minor APA formatting errors.
|
1 to 20 points: Numerous errors in APA. Level 1 headings for the Problem, Significance, and Solution were not used and in-text references or the reference page was not formatted correctly per APA guidelines.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Grammar, Spelling, and Structure |
20.5 to 22 points: Title page, body with headings, and reference list was included, and no errors were noted.
Minimal to zero errors in spelling, grammar, and structure. |
18.5 to 20 points: Some errors in spelling, grammar, and structure were noted. |
1 to 18 points: Numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and structure were noted.
|
0 points Not present |
|
|
Page Count |
18.5 to 20 points: Total pages were between 12-15 pages.
|
16.5 to 18 points: Total pages were between 10-11 pages. |
1 to 16 points: Total pages were between 1-11 pages. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Professor Comments: |
|
Total: |
/220 |