CJUST 410 DB FORUM 1 THREAD DUE 5/14/2020
Discussion Board Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content (70%) |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not Present |
Total |
|
Initial Post: Content |
36 to 40 points: · Each question/prompt is answered thoroughly and logically. · Major points are stated clearly and effectively. · Clear, logical flow to post; stayed on topic. · Personal examples are used appropriately |
28 to 35.5 points: · Most questions/prompts are answered. · Major points are stated clearly and effectively for the most part. · Post is clear, logical and focused for the most part. · Personal examples are overused. |
1 to 27.5 points: · Most prompts/ questions are answered. · Lack of clarity, coherence, logic and focus in key areas. · Personal examples are over-relied upon. |
0 points Not Present
|
|
|
Initial Post: Research Engagement |
15.5 to 17.5 points: · Ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are integrated. · One (1) “outside” (not from class) scripture is incorporated into the post. · One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post.
|
12.5 to 15 points: · Some ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are incorporated. · Scripture is used but not incorporated. · Scripture is not “quoted” for context. · Reference is used but not scholarly. · Reference is not incorporated. |
1 to 12 points: · Readings and presentations from the Module/Week are not incorporated. · No “outside” scripture incorporated. · No “outside” reference incorporated. |
0 points Not Present |
|
|
Replies: Content |
27 to 30 points: · One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. · It’s clear what the other student’s said. · There was a detailed “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning. · In addition to analysis, the post moves the other student’s post forward, with new ideas, questions, and research. · One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post.
|
21 to 26.5 points: · One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads. · It’s not clear what the other student said. · No “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning · New ideas, research, questions, and analysis are not included. · Reply posts do not seem to actually forward the classmate’s post. · Agreement or disagreement with some reasoning · Reference is used but not scholarly.
|
1 to 20.5 points: · Missing one reply post. · No analysis · It’s completely unclear what the other student said.
· Post is an opinion reply only · Mere agreement or disagreement only · Reply post only asks questions · No “outside” reference incorporated.
|
0 points Not Present |
|
|
Structure (30%) |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not Present |
Total |
|
Grammar, Spelling & APA: Initial Post |
18 to 20 points: Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
14 to 17.5 points: Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
1 to 13.5 points: Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
0 points Not Present |
|
|
Word Count Initial Post |
6.75 to 7.5 points: 150–250 words per reply. |
5.25 to 6.5 points: 80%-50% words less than the required length. |
1 to 5 points: 49%-1% words less than the required length. |
0 points Not Present |
|
|
Grammar, Spelling & APA: Replies |
9 to 10 points: Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
7 to 8.5 points Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
1 to 6.5 points: Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format. |
0 points Not Present |
|
|
Professor Comments: |
|
Total: |
/125 |