business ethics
1.Summary:
Read The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership and complete the questions at the end of the case study
Plz click the link you got questions
Like this
1. Creating Community: Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared values as the cornerstone of his decision making after the arrests? Did his decision to close all Starbucks stores for unconscious bias training and to create a new “Third Space Policy” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals? Did his handling of the incident promote positive relationships between employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of connectedness and shared values?
1. Encouraging Ethical Conduct: Did Johnson openly acknowledge that his decision was based in ethics and morality? Did his apology and actions promote awareness of an ethical issue? Did it create a positive or negative difference in the communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a positive or negative difference for Starbucks employees and customers?
1. Showing Discipline in One’s Role: Does Johnson explicitly accept responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a course correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with others when necessary? Does he show he understands what his role is in fixing this problem?
1. Clarifying Culture: Did Johnson clarify his values and the company’s values in his apology and with his subsequent actions? Did Johnson’s apology and follow-up actions uphold Starbucks’ mission and core values? Did he identify gaps between stated and actual values? Did Johnson’s apology help Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values align with the company’s?
1. Designing Ethical Systems: Did Johnson’s actions have impact beyond Starbucks? Did they sent a precedent for other companies to follow? Did his apology create a conversation about unconscious bias in the workplace? How do his apology and the subsequent follow-up actions compare to other companies and CEOs that have faced similar problems?
2nd question
Journal article
Journal article I need two copys
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Morals, principles, values, corporate social responsibility, or ethical culture.
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format.
```````````````````````````````---------------------------------------------------------------
3rd question
Summary:
Read Google's Handling of the "Echo Chamber Manifesto" and complete the questions at the end of the case study.
Plz click the link you got questions
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
4th question
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Stakeholder, corporate citizenship, reputation, corporate governance, or executive compensation.
Journal article I need two copys
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format.
5th question
Summary:
Read Wells Fargo Banking Scandal and complete the questions at the end of the case study.
Plz click the link you got questions
````````````````````--------------------------------------------------------------
6th question
Summary:
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Integrity, ethical dilemma, conflict of interest, bribery, or fraud.
Journal article I need two copys
Plz follow this instructions
DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement. SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 150-200 word range. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term. DISCUSSION: Using 300-350 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment. REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format.
1.
Summary
:
Read
The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership
and complete the questions
at the end of
the case study
P
lz
click the link you got questions
L
ike
this
1.
Creating Community:
Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared values as the
cornerstone of his decision making after the arrests?
Did his decision to
close all Starbucks stores for unconscious bias training and to create a new
“Third Space Policy
” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals?
Did his
handling of the incident promote positive relationships between
employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of connectedness
and shared values?
1.
Encouraging Ethical Conduct:
Did Johnson openly ack
nowledge that his
decision was based in ethics and morality?
Did his apology and actions
promote awareness of an ethical issue? Did it create a positive or negative
difference in the communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a positive or
negative differe
nce for Starbucks employees and customers?
1.
Showing Discipline in One’s Role:
Does Johnson explicitly accept
responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a course
correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with others when
necessary?
Does he show he understands what his role is in fixing this
problem?
1.
Clarifying Culture:
Did Johnson clarify his values and the company’s values
in his apology and with his subsequent actions?
Did Johnson’s apology
and follow
-
up actions uphold Starbuck
s’ mission and core values? Did he
identify gaps between stated and actual values?
Did Johnson’s apology
help Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values align with the
company’s?