BUSINESS ETHICS WEEKS 3-5
Samatha White
BUSINESSETHICCLASSWeeks3-5.docxBUSINESS ETHIC CLASS
WEEK 3
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussions and the any insights gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.
This is a benchmark assignment for the School of Information Technology MISM Master's Program students. Store your submission with any grading feedback in your Professional's Portfolio and use the following tag:
MISM Tag: MISM-PG6
Assignment:
Responses to each question should fully answer and explore the question, may be less than or around 500 words (or whatever word count fully answers each question), and should be supported with scholarly research from your textbook and also often from outside internet sources, excluding wiki sources. Remember that well-written responses do not need to be excessively wordy. Be sure to paraphrase and cite your sources. Refer to APA.
Check Your Understanding (40%):
1. Define Corporate Social Responsibility.
2. Provide four examples of corporation’s legal obligations.
3. Define and contrast the instrumental model of corporate management with the social contract model of corporate management.
4. List and explain the five major trends driving CSR
5. Explain why organizations are struggling to adopt CSR initiatives.
6. Explain the term “triple bottom line”
Exercises (20%) DB4.2 - approx. 500 words
Review and critique the CSR policies of a Fortune 100 company of your choice. What are the strengths of the strategies? Where might the corporation focus to improve their CSR strategies? (500 word essay)
Case Study (40%) approx. 500 words
Read issues 3 and 14 from Taking Sides. Choose one issue to respond to. Which view point do you side with? Why? Explain. Reference at least two outside resources that further support the view point you side with.
WEEK 4
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussions and any insights gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.
Assignment:
Responses to each question should fully answer and explore the question, may be less than or around 500 words (or whatever word count fully answers each question), and should be supported with scholarly research from your textbook and also often from outside internet sources, excluding wiki sources. Remember that well-written responses do not need to be excessively wordy. Be sure to paraphrase and cite your sources. Refer to APA.
Check Your Understanding (40%):
1. Explain the term corporate governance
2. Explain the importance of the “King I” and “King II’ reports.
3. Why do corporations need a board of directors?
4. What is the value of adding “outside directors?”
Exercises (20%) approx. 250 words
1. Which is more important to effective corporate governance: an audit committee or a compensation committee? Why? Explain your answer.
Case Study (40%) approx. 500 words
Review issues 4, 8, 9, 12, and 13 from Taking Sides. Choose one issue to respond to. Which viewpoint do you side with? Why? Explain. Reference at least two outside resources that further support the viewpoint you side with.
WEEK 5
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.
3. Consider the discussions and any insights gained from it.
4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.
Assignment:
Responses to each question should fully answer and explore the question, may be less than or around 500 words (or whatever word count fully answers each question), and should be supported with scholarly research from your textbook and also often from outside internet sources, excluding wiki sources. Remember that well-written responses do not need to be excessively wordy. Be sure to paraphrase and cite your sources. Refer to APA.
Check Your Understanding (40%):
1. What was the primary purpose of the FCPA?
2. What was the maximum fine for a U.S.corporation under the FCPA?
3. Which two distinct areas did the FCPA focus on?
4. List four examples of routine governmental action
5. What are the three steps in calculating financial penalties under FSGO?
6. Explain the seven steps of an effective compliance program.
7. What were the three key components of the 2004 Revised FSGO?
8. Explain the role of the PCAOB.
9. What are the five key requirements for auditor independence?
10. What issues prompted the revision of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations in 2004?
Exercises (20%) approx 350 to 400 words
1. Which is the most effective piece of legislation for enforcing ethical business practices: FCPA, FSGO, SOX, or Dodd-Frank? Explain your answer.
Case Study (40%) - approx 500 words
Review issues 6 and 7 from Taking Sides. Choose one issue to respond to. Which viewpoint do you side with? Why? Explain. Reference at least two outside resources that further support the viewpoint you side with.
