|
EVALUATION CRITERIA
|
0-28 points
Unsatisfactory
(Below 70%)
|
29-32 points
Satisfactory
(75%-80%)
|
33-36 points
Proficient
(85%-90%)
|
37-40 points
Distinguished
(95%-100%)
|
SCORE
|
|
Completed on time.
|
Late submission by more than three days.
|
Late by 1 to 3 days.
|
Submitted on time.
|
Submitted on time.
|
|
|
Completeness of content.
|
No relation between template and project/idea
|
Minimum requirements met, but the result is one that would not promote a good project.
|
Presented a good case for the selected project and the template selected matches the project well.
|
Presented a good case for the selected project and the template selected matches the project well. A clear case for proceeding and how to proceed is presented.
|
|
|
Template completed
|
Difficult to ascertain if template completed or not.
|
Template appears complete, but lacks certain elements of a good template.
|
Template complete and requirements identified. All appropriates sections included.
|
Template complete and requirements identified. All appropriates sections included. Template and project are well matched.
|
|
|
Quality of Content
|
Appears to be a hasty response with insufficient thought.
|
Minimal effort expended, but most of the bases covered and explained.
|
Does an adequate job on the template as a whole and ties together the threads in a meaningful fashion.
|
Makes a good case for the proposed project and presents all arguments cohesively.
|
|
|
Identified Risk and Change in the scope.
|
Risk and change neglected or ignored.
|
Risk and change included but minimally.
|
Risk and change identified and stressed appropriately.
|
Risk and change identified and stressed appropriately. Mitigation strategies included.
|
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Total Rubric Score =
200 points
|
|