Busi520
Marketing Management Group Project Individual Contribution Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Content Application |
23 to 25 points Strong connection between topic content and student contribution |
21 to 22 points Fair connection between topic content and student contribution |
1 to 20 points Weak to moderate connection between topic content and student contribution |
0 points
|
|
Logical Analysis |
23 to 25 points Exceptional student analysis of topic |
21 to 22 points Fair to strong student analysis of topic |
1 to 20 points Weak or short student analysis of topic |
0 points
|
|
Scholarly Research |
10 points Strong evidence of research using scholarly (peer-reviewed) and practitioner sources (Journal of Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad Age, Fortune) |
8 to 9 points Sufficient evidence of research using scholarly (peer-reviewed) and practitioner sources (Journal of Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad Age, Fortune) |
1 to 7 points Weak evidence of research using scholarly (peer-reviewed) and practitioner sources (Journal of Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad Age, Fortune) |
0 points
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Title and References Pages |
9 points Title and references pages are complete and correctly formatted |
8 points Title and references pages mostly complete and correctly formatted |
1 to 7 points Title and references pages lack content and/or incorrectly formatted |
0 points
|
|
APA Formatting |
8 points Few to no APA formatting errors |
7 points Modest number of APA formatting errors |
1 to 6 points Significant number of APA formatting errors
|
0 points
|
|
Spelling and Grammar |
8 points Few to no spelling/grammatical errors |
7 points Modest number of spelling/grammatical errors |
1 to 6 points Significant number of spelling/grammatical errors |
0 points |
Marketing Management Group Project Individual Contribution Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Content Application
23
to
25
points
Strong connection between topic
content and student contribution
21
to
22
points
Fair connection between topic
content and student contribution
1
to
20
points
Weak to moderate connection
between topic content and student
contribution
0 points
Logical
Analysis
23
to
25
points
E
xception
al student analysis of
topic
21
to
22
points
Fair to strong student analysis of
topic
1
to
20
points
Weak or short student analysis of
topic
0 points
Scholarly Research
10
points
Strong evidence of research using
scholarly
(peer
-
reviewed)
and
practitioner
sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall
Street Journal,
Ad
Age,
Fortune)
8 to
9
points
Sufficient
evidence of research
using scholarly
(peer
-
reviewed)
and
practitioner
sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall
Street Journal,
Ad
Age,
Fortune)
1 to
7
points
Weak
evidence of research using
scholarly
(peer
-
reviewed)
and
practitioner
sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall
Street Journal,
Ad
Age,
Fortune)
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Title and References
Page
s
9
points
Title and references pages are
complete and correctly formatted
8
points
Title and references pages mostly
complete and correctly formatted
1 to
7
points
Title and references pages lack
content
and/or incorrectly formatted
0
points
APA Formatting
8
points
Few to no APA formatting errors
7
points
Modest number of APA
formatting
errors
1 to
6
points
Significant number of APA formatting
errors
0 points
Spelling and
Grammar
8
points
Few to no spelling/grammatical
errors
7
points
Modest number of
spelling/grammatical errors
1 to
6
points
Significant number
of
spelling/grammatical errors
0 points
Marketing Management Group Project Individual Contribution Grading Rubric
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Content Application
23 to 25 points
Strong connection between topic
content and student contribution
21 to 22 points
Fair connection between topic
content and student contribution
1 to 20 points
Weak to moderate connection
between topic content and student
contribution
0 points
Logical Analysis
23 to 25 points
Exceptional student analysis of
topic
21 to 22 points
Fair to strong student analysis of
topic
1 to 20 points
Weak or short student analysis of
topic
0 points
Scholarly Research
10 points
Strong evidence of research using
scholarly (peer-reviewed) and
practitioner sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad
Age, Fortune)
8 to 9 points
Sufficient evidence of research
using scholarly (peer-reviewed) and
practitioner sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad
Age, Fortune)
1 to 7 points
Weak evidence of research using
scholarly (peer-reviewed) and
practitioner sources (Journal of
Marketing, Wall Street Journal, Ad
Age, Fortune)
0 points
Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
Title and References
Pages
9 points
Title and references pages are
complete and correctly formatted
8 points
Title and references pages mostly
complete and correctly formatted
1 to 7 points
Title and references pages lack
content and/or incorrectly formatted
0 points
APA Formatting
8 points
Few to no APA formatting errors
7 points
Modest number of APA formatting
errors
1 to 6 points
Significant number of APA formatting
errors
0 points
Spelling and
Grammar
8 points
Few to no spelling/grammatical
errors
7 points
Modest number of
spelling/grammatical errors
1 to 6 points
Significant number of
spelling/grammatical errors
0 points