Reserved for Hifsa
BUSI 505
Research Project (Final Document Draft)
Grading Rubric (75 Points)
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Abstract 10 points |
Points: 10 · All required information is included. · No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. |
Points: 7-9 · All required information is included. · Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct. |
Points: 1-6 · Some required information is included. · Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Introduction 7 points |
Points: 7 · Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement. · Relevance to course/topic is articulated well. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise. · Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement. |
Points: 6 · Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting. · Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated. · Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely. · Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated. |
Points: 5 to 1 · Background information is not clearly articulated. · Relevance to course/topic is unclear. · Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable. · Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Content 7 points |
Points: 7 · Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement. · Focus is on research findings. · Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed. |
Points: 6 · Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness. · Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced. |
Points: 5 to 1 · Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking. · Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement. · Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Conclusion 7 points |
Points: 7 · A summary of the main points is clearly articulated. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear. · Areas of future research are clearly identified. |
Points: 6 · A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity. · Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity. |
Points: 5 to 1 · A summary of the main points is not clearly presented. · Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are absent, illogical, irrelevant, or unclear. · Areas of future research are not identified. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Word Count 7 points |
Points: 7 · The word count is 4,500–6,000. |
Points: 6 · The word count is 2,000–4,499. |
Points: 5 to 1 · The word count is 1–1,999. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
References (Number of Sources Utilized) 7 points |
Points: 7 · A total of 20 or more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources is included. |
Points: 6 · A total of 15–19 more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included. |
Points: 5 to 1 · Less than 15 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
SafeAssign Score 7 points |
Points: 7 · Less than 10% match. |
Points: 6 · A match of 11–15 %. |
Points: 5 to 1 · More than 15% match. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Title Page 4 points |
Points: 4 · All required information is included. · No extraneous information is included. |
Points: 3 · All required information is included. · Some extraneous information is included. |
Points: 2 to 1 · Some required information is included. · Extraneous information is included. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Logical Flow 4 points |
Points: 4 · The reader is guided smoothly through the logically arranged paper. · Current APA level headings are used. · No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page. |
Points: 3 · The overall arrangement is logical but is occasionally difficult to follow. · A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the headings. · No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page. |
Points: 2 to 1 · The arrangement of content is haphazard and difficult to follow. · Headings are not present or are formatted inappropriately. · One (or more) heading is alone at the bottom of a page. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
and Spacing 4 points |
Points: 4 · Times New Roman or Arial is used. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is used between all lines. · There is only 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces. |
Points: 3 · Times New Roman or Arial is used through most of the document. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is used between most lines. · There is only 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces. |
Points: 2 to 1 · Times New Roman or Arial is not used. · A margin of 1 1/2 inch is not used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are not used on the top, right, and bottom borders. · Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is not used consistently between lines. · There is often more than 1 space between sentences. · Paragraphs are not indented 5 spaces. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
References (Formatting) 5 points |
Points: 5 · Proper formatting is used throughout the reference list. · Each reference has a matching citation(s). |
Points: 4 · A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the reference list. · Each reference has a matching citation(s). |
Points: 3 to 1 · Multiple formatting errors occurred in the reference list. · One or more reference does not have a matching citation. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Spelling/Grammar 4 points |
Points: 4 · Spelling and grammar are correct. |
Points: 3 · Spelling and grammar are mostly correct with only 1–2 errors noted. |
Points: 2 to 1 · Spelling and grammar require further review with 3–6 errors noted. |
Points: 0 · Not Present |
|
|
Total Points |
/75 |
Instructor’s Comments: