|
Areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, evaluation of topics, participation and timeliness
|
25 to 28 points
Superior work in all areas - Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style.
Specifically:
· The topic to be discussed is clear
· The introduction slide provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents
· The issues raised in the topic are treated objectively
· Differing viewpoints considered, analyzed, and treated
· The beliefs expressed about the importance of business etiquette to organizational success are well developed
· The conclusion offers a robust summary of issues treated in the paper
· The conclusion offers suggestions for further study
· The PowerPoint contains 5-10 separate scholarly sources
· The presentation is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
20 to 24 points
Good work in most areas - Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
Specifically:
· The topic to be discussed is clear
· The introduction slide provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents
· The issues raised in the topic are mostly treated objectively
· Differing viewpoints mostly considered, analyzed, and treated
· The beliefs expressed about the importance of business etiquette to organizational success are mostly well developed
· The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper
· The conclusion offers suggestions for further study
· The PowerPoint contains 5-10 separate scholarly sources
· The presentation is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
1 to 19 points
Fair work in most areas – Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
Specifically:
· The topic to be discussed is fairly clear
· The introduction slide provides a fairly clear overview of the paper’s contents
· The issues raised in the topic are generally treated objectively
· Differing viewpoints somewhat considered, analyzed, and treated
· The beliefs expressed about the importance of business etiquette to organizational success are somewhat well developed
· The conclusion offers a brief summary of issues treated in the paper
· The conclusion offers superficial suggestions for further study
· The PowerPoint contains fewer than 5-10 separate scholarly sources
· The presentation is written in an objective (3rd person) format and covers the topic to sufficient depth for an upper-class research paper
|
0 points
Failing – Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of work.
Specifically:
· The topic to be discussed is not clear or absent
· The introduction slide does not provide an overview of the paper’s contents
· The issues raised in the topic are not treated objectively
· Differing viewpoints not considered, analyzed, and treated
· The beliefs expressed about the importance of business etiquette to organizational success are not well developed
· The conclusion does not offer a summary of issues treated in the paper
· The conclusion does not offer suggestions for further study
· The PowerPoint contains fewer than 4 separate scholarly sources
· The presentation is not in 3rd person and does not sufficiently cover the topic for an upper-class research paper
|
|
Writing Style (APA formatting), grammatical errors and sentence structure
|
11 to 12 points
· Minimal to non-existent grammatical and APA errors.
· The PowerPoint contains 5-10 slides
|
8 to 10 points
· Limited grammatical and APA errors.
· The PowerPoint contains 5-10 slides
|
1 to 7 points
· Contains numerous grammatical and APA errors.
· The PowerPoint contains fewer than 5-10 slides
|
0 points
· Contains excessive grammatical and APA errors.
· The PowerPoint contains fewer than 4 slides
|