|
Content
|
All key components of the group wiki scenario are addressed well. The final group recommendation page has a clear, logical flow and includes a comprehensive analysis of the options and a well-informed recommendation. Significant research and supporting evidence is provided. The final recommendation is integrated with biblical principles and the Christian worldview. Evidence on the group wiki indicates regular interaction among group members in brainstorming, drafting, researching and writing.
|
Most of the key components of the group wiki scenario are addressed. The final group recommendation page has a logical flow and includes an analysis of the options and a reasonably well-informed recommendation. Some research and supporting evidence is provided. The final recommendation is somewhat related to biblical principles and the Christian worldview. Evidence on the group wiki indicates some interaction among group members in brainstorming, drafting, researching and writing.
|
The key components of the group wiki scenario are addressed minimally. The final group recommendation page provides minimal analysis of the options leading to a poorly-informed recommendation. Minimal research and supporting evidence is provided. The final recommendation is not related to biblical principles or the Christian worldview. Evidence on the group wiki indicates minimal interaction among group members in brainstorming, drafting, researching and writing.
|
Not present
|
|
Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
|
Group Wiki area contains all of the wiki pages specified in the instructions. Spelling, grammar and current APA format are correct.
|
Group Wiki area contains some of the wiki pages specified in the instructions. Spelling, grammar and/or APA format errors noted but minimal.
|
Group Wiki area does not contain the wiki pages specified in the instructions. Spelling, grammar, and/or APA format errors distract.
|
Not present
|
Zola_17
BUSI422LUOGroupWikiRubric2_18.docx
0
