DB 1/5 - Investment
BUSI 420 LUO
Discussion Board Forum Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content 40 points |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
Points Earned |
|
Original Thread
|
26 to 30 points · All key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread. · Major points are supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent examples (conceptual and/or personal); · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts); and · At least 3 scholarly sources cited effectively.
|
19 to 25 points · Most key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread. · Major points are supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent examples (conceptual and/or personal); · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts); and · 1 – 3 scholarly sources cited effectively.
|
1 to 18 points · Most key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are left unanswered. · Major points are not supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent examples (conceptual and/or personal); · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts); and · No scholarly sources cited effectively.
|
0 points
|
|
|
Reply
|
9 to 10 points · Major points are supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples; and · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts). · Reply identifies a point in the original post and expounds on it. · At least 2 scholarly sources cited effectively. |
7 to 8 points · Most points are supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples; and · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts). · Reply identifies a point in the original post and expounds on it. · A et least 1 scholarly source cited effectively. |
1 to 6 points · Major points are supported by the following: · Reading & Study materials; · Pertinent, conceptual, or personal examples; and · Thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts). · Reply does not identify any point from the original post. · No scholarly sources cited effectively.
|
0 points
|
|
|
Structure 10 points |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
Points Earned |
|
Original Thread
|
5 points · Proper spelling and grammar are used. · The required word count (500–750 words) is met. · Communication follows Student Expectations . · In-text citations and reference items are in current APA format. |
4 points · Some spelling and grammar mistakes exist. · Word Count is between 400-500 words is met. · Communication follows Student Expectations . · In-text citations and reference items contain errors from current APA format. |
· Significant spelling and grammar mistakes exist. · Word Count is less than 400 words. · Communication does not adhere to Student Expectations . · In-text citations and reference items present but are not in current APA format. |
0 points
|
|
|
Reply
|
5 points · Proper spelling and grammar are used. · The required word count (300–500 words) is met. · Communication follows Student Expectations . |
4 points · Some spelling and grammar mistakes exist. · Word Count is less than 300 words. · Communication follows Student Expectations .
|
1 to 3 points · Significant spelling and grammar mistakes exist. · Word Count is less than 300 words. · Communication does not adhere to Student Expectations .
|
0 points |
|
|
Total |
/50 |
Page 1 of 2