Wk7: Mini Lit Review & Wk7: Devotion

profileclavo22
BUS8010ResearchProposalRubricUpdate.pdf

BUSI 8010 – Trevecca Nazarene University Research Proposal Rubric

DEFICIENT

(0 points)

MARGINAL (3 points)

PROFICIENT (4 points)

OUTSTANDING (5 points)

Points Earned

Research Benefits

Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good understanding of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demonstrates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.

Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.

Thesis Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation

Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.

Intended Audience

Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation

Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.

DEFICIENT

(0 points)

MARGINAL (3 points)

PROFICIENT (4 points)

OUTSTANDING (5 points)

Points Earned

Approach to the Subject

Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.

Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation

Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.

Types of Sources

The sources chosen are inadequate for this topic.

Some good sources chosen, but more good sources that fit the topic are needed.

Some excellent sources for this topic.

The types of sources are perfect for the topic.

Sources The content of the paper is not backed by any references from the textbook, journal articles, or appropriate websites

The content of the paper is backed by minimal references from the textbook, journal articles, or appropriate websites

The content of the paper is backed by references of suitable quantity and quality

The content of the paper is backed by an appropriate quantity of references of outstanding quality

Documentation of Sources

Paper does not list any citations or sources

Either in-text citations or references are missing, incomplete, or not in correct APA format

In-text citations and references are provided but use incomplete or incorrect APA format

All sources are cited with in-text citations and references. All citations and references are in correct APA format.

Communication The proposal fails to communicate

The proposal marginally communicates

The communication is effective

The communication is highly effective

Writing Mechanics

The writing is unclear and is flawed by several grammatical or spelling errors

The writing is somewhat clear and somewhat flawed.

The writing is clear and contains few flaws

The writing is clear and flawless

DEFICIENT

(0 points)

MARGINAL (3 points)

PROFICIENT (4 points)

OUTSTANDING (5 points)

Points Earned

Format The style and

format of the proposal departs significantly from APA

The proposal generally follows APA style and format, with several exceptions

The proposal generally follows APA style and format, with a few exceptions

The proposal accurately follows APA style and format, with no exceptions

TOTAL (Max = 50)