Wk7: Mini Lit Review & Wk7: Devotion
clavo22
BUSI 8010 – Trevecca Nazarene University Research Proposal Rubric
DEFICIENT
(0 points)
MARGINAL (3 points)
PROFICIENT (4 points)
OUTSTANDING (5 points)
Points Earned
Research Benefits
Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good understanding of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demonstrates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.
Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.
Thesis Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation
Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.
Intended Audience
Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation
Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.
DEFICIENT
(0 points)
MARGINAL (3 points)
PROFICIENT (4 points)
OUTSTANDING (5 points)
Points Earned
Approach to the Subject
Demonstrates a failure to fully understand critical know- ledge. Does not cover each point well. Does not demonstrate understanding of the concept. Fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates some knowledge, but shows some deficiencies. Does not cover each point well and does not demonstrate a good under- standing of the concept, or fails to accurately apply the concept to the situation.
Demonstrates an understanding of critical knowledge without any significant errors. Covers each point well and demon- strates a solid understanding of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation
Exceptional performance demonstrating mastery of the concept. Covers each point thoroughly and demonstrates a deep under- standing of the concept. Appropriately applies concept to the situation.
Types of Sources
The sources chosen are inadequate for this topic.
Some good sources chosen, but more good sources that fit the topic are needed.
Some excellent sources for this topic.
The types of sources are perfect for the topic.
Sources The content of the paper is not backed by any references from the textbook, journal articles, or appropriate websites
The content of the paper is backed by minimal references from the textbook, journal articles, or appropriate websites
The content of the paper is backed by references of suitable quantity and quality
The content of the paper is backed by an appropriate quantity of references of outstanding quality
Documentation of Sources
Paper does not list any citations or sources
Either in-text citations or references are missing, incomplete, or not in correct APA format
In-text citations and references are provided but use incomplete or incorrect APA format
All sources are cited with in-text citations and references. All citations and references are in correct APA format.
Communication The proposal fails to communicate
The proposal marginally communicates
The communication is effective
The communication is highly effective
Writing Mechanics
The writing is unclear and is flawed by several grammatical or spelling errors
The writing is somewhat clear and somewhat flawed.
The writing is clear and contains few flaws
The writing is clear and flawless
DEFICIENT
(0 points)
MARGINAL (3 points)
PROFICIENT (4 points)
OUTSTANDING (5 points)
Points Earned
Format The style and
format of the proposal departs significantly from APA
The proposal generally follows APA style and format, with several exceptions
The proposal generally follows APA style and format, with a few exceptions
The proposal accurately follows APA style and format, with no exceptions
TOTAL (Max = 50)