Unit 1 Assignment (Bus330
Due: Sunday by 11:59 pm at the end of Unit 1. Investigate various journals for an article of interest to you. The article should be no more than two years old and have sufficient content for a two-page report. The object of the critique is to describe how the study followed, or failed to follow, the criteria for good research, as described in Chapter 1. You should speculate on which of the writer’s conclusions were warranted, and which were not. (You can use the Article Critique Instructions as a guide.)
o The relationship between research, the manager, and the researcher. o The conflict that can exist when the manager is the researcher. o The characteristics that identify good and bad research.
The final product will be a paper that is:
2 - 3 double-spaced, APA formatted pages; and
Includes at least two (2) references to this week’s materials. The requirements for your assignment are:
For your first research project, please investigate one of the journals listed below for
an article of interest to you. The article should be no more than two years old. Choose
one that has sufficient content from which you can write a report a two-page report
(approximately two double-spaced pages).
The object of your critique is to describe how the study followed, or failed to follow, the
criteria for good research, as described in Chapter 1. Speculate on which of the
writer’s conclusions were warranted and which were not. In addition to Chapter 1,
Chapters 2 and 3 may also be helpful in getting you started. So read each!
BUS330 – Business Analytics
Unit 1 Assignment- Chapter 1 Research Critique
Journals to consider:
Academy of Management Review
Administrative Science Quarterly
Business and Society Review
Decision Sciences
Financial Management
Harvard Business Review
Industrial and Labor Relations
Review
Journal of Accountancy
Journal of Applied Behavior
Science
Journal of Applied Psychology
Journal of Banking and Finance
Journal of Finance
Management Review
Personnel Journal
Public Administration Review
Training and Development
Journal
Other journals may also be used.
Students: Be sure to read the criteria and review the grading rubric on the next page, by which your paper/project will be evaluated, before you write, and again after you write.
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 1 Assignment
CRITERIA Deficient Proficient Exemplary Points Earned
Overview of the Topic
0-13 Points
Does not provide an adequate overview or is missing.
14-27 Points
Overview is presented, though may not be clear or complete.
28-40 Points
Overview is clearly presented including all criteria outlined above.
Complete Answers
0-11 Points Questions unanswered and/or poorly answered.
12-23 Points All questions answered with 1-2 sentence inputs.
24-35 Points All questions answered with depth and clarity.
References to Course Materials
0-5 Points
Less than 2 references, no assimilation to the questions.
6-10 Points
2 references, minimal assimilation to the questions.
11-15 Points
3 or more references and assimilations show depth and clarity.
APA Format 0-1 Point Format has errors that impede professional presentation; and/or APA not followed, reference page missing.
2-3 Points APA format and reference page has few errors that do not impede professional presentation.
4-5 Points APA format and reference page is clear, professional, and error free.
Writing Quality 0-1 Point
More than 7 writing errors, to include spelling and punctuation.
2-3 Points
More than 4 writing errors, to include spelling and punctuation.
4-5 Points
No writing errors.
Total 100