BUS3041 WK 3 Project

BUS3041 Week 3 Project Rubric Course: BUS3041-Managerial Communications SU02

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24– 26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27– 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Assessed at least five

key communication

problems that

organizations and

leaders face.

/ 30Did not identify key

communication

problems.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified key

communication

problems.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described key

communication

problems.

Weakly supported

with research.

Assessed at least five

key communication

problems that

organizations and

leaders face.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Assessment of at least

five key

communication

problems that

organizations and

leaders face was

compelling, with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24– 26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27– 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Justified at least five

best practices for

organization-wide

messages (i.e.,

channel, timing, etc.).

/ 30Did not identify best

practices for

organization-wide

messages.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified best

practices for

organization-wide

messages.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described best

practices for

organization-wide

messages.

Weakly supported

with research.

Justified at least five

best practices for

organization-wide

messages.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Justification of at least

five best practices for

organization-wide

messages was

compelling, with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24– 26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27– 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24– 26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27– 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Proposed at least

five key principles for

conducting effective

meetings.

/ 30Did not identify key

principles for

conducting effective

meetings.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified key

principles for

conducting effective

meetings.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described key

principles for

conducting effective

meetings.

Weakly supported

with research.

Proposed at least five

key principles for

conducting effective

meetings.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Proposal of key

principles for

conducting effective

meetings was

compelling, with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20) 20 points

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23) 23 points

Proficient (B range) (24– 26) 26 points

Exemplary (A range) (27– 30) 30 points

Criterion Score

Defended three ideas

as “the most

important thing a

leader must do” for

effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or

employees.

/ 30Did not identify ideas

as “the most important

thing a leader must do”

for effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or

employees.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified ideas as “the

most important thing a

leader must do” for

effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or

employees.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described ideas as

“the most important

thing a leader must do”

for effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or

employees.

Weakly supported

with research.

Defended three ideas

as “the most important

thing a leader must do”

for effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or

employees.

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Defense of three ideas

as “the most important

thing a leader must do”

for effective 1:1

discussions with

followers or employees

was compelling, with

well-developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C range) (28–31) 31 points

Proficient (B range) (32– 35) 35 points

Exemplary (A range) (36– 40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C range) (28–31) 31 points

Proficient (B range) (32– 35) 35 points

Exemplary (A range) (36– 40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Evaluated the

benefits of your

organization’s top

leadership team

adopting the

principles and

practices you are

recommending

(throughout your

presentation) and the

consequences of

failing to adopt the

principles and

practices

/ 40Did not identify

principles and

practices.

Unsupported with

research.

Identified principles

and practices.

Lacked credible

research support.

Described principles

and practices.

Weakly supported

with research.

Evaluated the benefits

of your organization’s

top leadership team

adopting the principles

and practices you are

recommending

Sufficiently supported

with research.

Evaluation of the

benefits of your

organization’s top

leadership team

adopting the principles

and practices you are

recommending was

compelling, with well-

developed logical

progression.

Well supported by

research.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Communication: Use

of tone, word choice,

audience, transitions,

and progression of

ideas.

/ 10Submission contained

no discernible overall

intent in author’s

selection of ideas

Submission contained

random presentation

of ideas, which

prevented

understanding the

majority of author’s

overall intent.

Ideas presented in a

way that forced the

reader to make

repeated inferences in

order to identify and

follow the author’s

overall intent.

The reader could

follow the author’s

overall intent as

stated.

The writer’s overall

argument and

language were clear

and tightly focused,

leaving the reader with

no room for confusion

about author’s intent.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Total / 200

Overall Score

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points

Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points

Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points

Exemplary (A range) (9– 10) 10 points

Criterion Score

Mechanics: Use of

grammar, sentence

structure, and

spelling.

/ 10Errors in basic writing

conventions were

sufficiently numerous

to prevent reader

comprehension.

Errors in basic writing

conventions were

sufficiently numerous

to prevent reader

comprehension of

majority of the work.

Errors in basic writing

conventions interfered

with, but did not

prevent, reader

comprehension.

The reader noticed a

few errors in basic

writing conventions

but these few errors

did not interfere with

reader comprehension.

Test was basically error

free, so that a reader

would have to

purposely search to

find any errors that

may be present.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points

Proficient (B range) (16– 17) 17 points

Exemplary (A range) (18– 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Academic/APA/PPT

Formatting Use of

citations, references,

and structural

formatting including

such elements as title

page, running head,

page numbers,

headings, title slides,

graphics, data, notes

section, (as

appropriate),

introduction, and

conclusio

/ 20No attempt at

Academic/APA/PPT

formatting in

presentation

Academic/APA/PPT

format attempted, but

errors were significant,

preventing

comprehension of

message.

Academic/APA/PPT

format attempted but

errors were distracting.

Used

Academic/APA/PPT

format accurately.

Errors noticeable but

minor.

Used

Academic/APA/PPT

format proficiently.

Work basically error

free.

No Submission 0 points minimum

Emerging (F through D range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory (C range) 140 points minimum

Proficient (B range) 160 points minimum

Exemplary (A range) 180 points minimum