Corporate Philanthropy

profileltrice04
Bus250Week5Final_Rll.pptx

BUS 250

Week 5

Week 5 Instructor Guidance

BUS 250: Corporate & Social Responsibility

BUS 250

Week 5

BUS 250 Course learning map

Week 1: Society and the Organization

Week 2: The Global Community and the Equitable Workplace

Week 3: The Organization’s Environmental Impact

Week 4: Internal Issues

Week 5: Social Media, Philanthropy, and Ethical Dilemmas

3

Week 5 Learning Activities

Task Description Due
Discussion #1: Social Media Thurs, Day 3
Discussion #2: Corporate Philanthropy Thurs, Day 3
Final Paper Organization Ethical Dilemmas Mon, Day 7

Assigned Reading Description Source
Text: Chapter 10 Leadership Challenges and Opportunities (Hammond & Christensen, 2016)
Article: Matthew & Heimer Matthews, C., & Heimer, M. (2016). The 5 biggest corporate scandals of 2016. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/12/28/biggest-corporate-scandals-2016/
Article: Shen Shen, L. (2017). The 10 biggest business scandals of 2017. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/12/31/biggest-corporate-scandals-misconduct-2017-pr/

4

Week 5: Important notes

Written Assignment:

Note the page requirement of 8-10 pages

Note resource requirements of at least four scholarly sources (in addition to text)

Note point value for this assignment!

Don’t forget your end of course survey!

LATE WORK is not permitted in week five!

5

This week you will learn to:

Evaluate the free speech of employees when giving opinions about their employers in a public forum.

Analyze how companies can direct their giving strategically.

Synthesize previous learning outcomes in a final project

Week 5 Learning Objectives

6

Chapter 10 Leadership Challenges & Opportunities

Concepts

Leadership as Monarchy and Divine Right

Great Man Theory

Trait Theories

Behavioral Theories

Process Theories

Challenges

Waste Reduction

Social Equality

(Hammond & Christensen, Chapter 10 , 2016)

7

Trait theory

There are several trait theories. Two of the most popular are

Big Five

Sixteen Personality Factor Model

The big five personality theory was developed by McCrae (Westerhoff, 2008). The five factors are extroversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism (Westerhoff). Based on how high an individual scores in each category, the trait theory can be used to describe personality. For example, a successful salesperson would likely score high in extroversion. Extroversion includes three measures: communicativeness, initiative, and cheerfulness. High openness scores are often seen in artists. Openness includes creativity and novelty. A good example of someone who should have a high agreeableness factor is an elementary school teacher. Agreeableness includes empathy, warmth, and friendliness. Those with high levels of conscientiousness include scientists and accountants. Conscientiousness factors include discipline, trust, and motivation. The final factor is neuroticism. This factor measures emotional stability. Individuals how score high in neuroticism are anxious, inhibited, lack self-assurance, and are often more moody (Westerhoff).

How can trait tests help an organization?

8

Chapter 10 Leadership Challenges & Opportunities

Next Generation Leaders

Systems thinkers

Emotional intelligence

Collaborative skills

Transparent communication

Ethical behavior

Steward for the environment

Nonhierarchical Leadership

Continuous learning

(Hammond & Christensen, Chapter 10, 2016)

9

Emotional intelligence

Emotional intelligence measures both personality and behavioral characteristics. Factors measured can include

Persistence

self-awareness

Diligence

impulse control

motivation

(Plaude & Rascevska, 2011).

Corporate Philanthropy

“Philanthropy can often be the most cost-effective way for a company to improve its competitive context, enabling companies to leverage the efforts and infrastructure of nonprofits and other institutions” (Porter & Kramer, 2002).

Porter and Kramer (2002) posited that organizations can utilize corporate philanthropy as a competitive advantage. They suggested that using Porter’s four elements of competitive context as a foundation would be the best method. The method is based on four key elements. First is factor conditions (Porter & Kramer). Attaining high productivity is dependent upon several factors including high-quality technological and scientific institutions, the availability of natural resources, acceptable physical infrastructure, trained workers and, efficient and transparent administrative processes (Porter & Kramer).

Second, demand conditions include the size of the local market, the sophistication of the customers in the market, and the suitability of product standards (Porter & Kramer, 2002). The more savvy the local customers are the more competitive the market is likely to be. This is because the customers are better able to provide insight that can help in innovation. The third factor is the context for strategy and rivalry. This factor is related to governance because rules, incentives, and societal norms affect competition and have influence on productivity. The final factor is related and supporting industries. An organization’s productivity can be boosted through nearby first-rate supporting industries and services (Porter & Kramer).

11

Organizational Ethical dilemmas

Commonly organizational mistakes that lead to ethical dilemmas

Leadership does not model the appropriate behaviors

Leaders act entitled

Cutting corners to meet misplaced incentives or being rewarded for the wrong things

Employees feeling they must obey leadership even when they know they are being asked to do something wrong.

Fear of conflict

Defensive logic – The everyone else is doing it theory

(Ceplenski, 2013)

Additional Resources

From Ashford’s Library –

Are we allowed to discipline employee who badmouthed boss on Facebook? (2017, Mar. 11) HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law Apr. 2016: 8. Business Insights: Global.

Lipton, J. (2007, August 14). Mattel gets the lead out. Forbes.

Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2007/08/14/mattel-china-recall- markets-equity-cx_jl_0814markets12.html

Story, L. (2007, August 2). Lead paint prompts Mattel to recall 967,000 toys. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

Story, L., & Barboza, D. (2007, August 15). Mattel recalls 19 million toys sent from China. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

Update if applicable.

13

Additional resources

From Ashford’s Library – Films on Demand

Philanthropy, Inc.: The bottom line on corporate charity [Video file]. (2012). Retrieved from http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=100753&xtid=53327

Philanthropy, Inc.: The bottom line on corporate charity [Video file]. (2012). Retrieved from http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=100753&xtid=53327

Any questions?

Please post your questions in the Ask the Instructor thread.

References

Hammond, S. C., & Christensen, L. J. (2016). Corporate and social responsibility: Road map for a sustainable future. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002, December). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2002/12/the-competitive-advantage-of- corporate-philanthropy

Westerhoff, N. (2008, Dec. 17). The “big five” personality traits. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-big-five/

16

16