Corporate Philanthropy
BUS 250
Week 5
Week 5 Instructor Guidance
BUS 250: Corporate & Social Responsibility
BUS 250
Week 5
BUS 250 Course learning map
Week 1: Society and the Organization
Week 2: The Global Community and the Equitable Workplace
Week 3: The Organization’s Environmental Impact
Week 4: Internal Issues
Week 5: Social Media, Philanthropy, and Ethical Dilemmas
3
Week 5 Learning Activities
| Task | Description | Due |
| Discussion #1: | Social Media | Thurs, Day 3 |
| Discussion #2: | Corporate Philanthropy | Thurs, Day 3 |
| Final Paper | Organization Ethical Dilemmas | Mon, Day 7 |
| Assigned Reading | Description | Source |
| Text: Chapter 10 | Leadership Challenges and Opportunities | (Hammond & Christensen, 2016) |
| Article: Matthew & Heimer | Matthews, C., & Heimer, M. (2016). The 5 biggest corporate scandals of 2016. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/12/28/biggest-corporate-scandals-2016/ | |
| Article: Shen | Shen, L. (2017). The 10 biggest business scandals of 2017. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/12/31/biggest-corporate-scandals-misconduct-2017-pr/ |
4
Week 5: Important notes
Written Assignment:
Note the page requirement of 8-10 pages
Note resource requirements of at least four scholarly sources (in addition to text)
Note point value for this assignment!
Don’t forget your end of course survey!
LATE WORK is not permitted in week five!
5
This week you will learn to:
Evaluate the free speech of employees when giving opinions about their employers in a public forum.
Analyze how companies can direct their giving strategically.
Synthesize previous learning outcomes in a final project
Week 5 Learning Objectives
6
Chapter 10 Leadership Challenges & Opportunities
Concepts
Leadership as Monarchy and Divine Right
Great Man Theory
Trait Theories
Behavioral Theories
Process Theories
Challenges
Waste Reduction
Social Equality
(Hammond & Christensen, Chapter 10 , 2016)
7
Trait theory
There are several trait theories. Two of the most popular are
Big Five
Sixteen Personality Factor Model
The big five personality theory was developed by McCrae (Westerhoff, 2008). The five factors are extroversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism (Westerhoff). Based on how high an individual scores in each category, the trait theory can be used to describe personality. For example, a successful salesperson would likely score high in extroversion. Extroversion includes three measures: communicativeness, initiative, and cheerfulness. High openness scores are often seen in artists. Openness includes creativity and novelty. A good example of someone who should have a high agreeableness factor is an elementary school teacher. Agreeableness includes empathy, warmth, and friendliness. Those with high levels of conscientiousness include scientists and accountants. Conscientiousness factors include discipline, trust, and motivation. The final factor is neuroticism. This factor measures emotional stability. Individuals how score high in neuroticism are anxious, inhibited, lack self-assurance, and are often more moody (Westerhoff).
How can trait tests help an organization?
8
Chapter 10 Leadership Challenges & Opportunities
Next Generation Leaders
Systems thinkers
Emotional intelligence
Collaborative skills
Transparent communication
Ethical behavior
Steward for the environment
Nonhierarchical Leadership
Continuous learning
(Hammond & Christensen, Chapter 10, 2016)
9
Emotional intelligence
Emotional intelligence measures both personality and behavioral characteristics. Factors measured can include
Persistence
self-awareness
Diligence
impulse control
motivation
(Plaude & Rascevska, 2011).
Corporate Philanthropy
“Philanthropy can often be the most cost-effective way for a company to improve its competitive context, enabling companies to leverage the efforts and infrastructure of nonprofits and other institutions” (Porter & Kramer, 2002).
Porter and Kramer (2002) posited that organizations can utilize corporate philanthropy as a competitive advantage. They suggested that using Porter’s four elements of competitive context as a foundation would be the best method. The method is based on four key elements. First is factor conditions (Porter & Kramer). Attaining high productivity is dependent upon several factors including high-quality technological and scientific institutions, the availability of natural resources, acceptable physical infrastructure, trained workers and, efficient and transparent administrative processes (Porter & Kramer).
Second, demand conditions include the size of the local market, the sophistication of the customers in the market, and the suitability of product standards (Porter & Kramer, 2002). The more savvy the local customers are the more competitive the market is likely to be. This is because the customers are better able to provide insight that can help in innovation. The third factor is the context for strategy and rivalry. This factor is related to governance because rules, incentives, and societal norms affect competition and have influence on productivity. The final factor is related and supporting industries. An organization’s productivity can be boosted through nearby first-rate supporting industries and services (Porter & Kramer).
11
Organizational Ethical dilemmas
Commonly organizational mistakes that lead to ethical dilemmas
Leadership does not model the appropriate behaviors
Leaders act entitled
Cutting corners to meet misplaced incentives or being rewarded for the wrong things
Employees feeling they must obey leadership even when they know they are being asked to do something wrong.
Fear of conflict
Defensive logic – The everyone else is doing it theory
(Ceplenski, 2013)
Additional Resources
From Ashford’s Library –
Are we allowed to discipline employee who badmouthed boss on Facebook? (2017, Mar. 11) HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law Apr. 2016: 8. Business Insights: Global.
Lipton, J. (2007, August 14). Mattel gets the lead out. Forbes.
Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2007/08/14/mattel-china-recall- markets-equity-cx_jl_0814markets12.html
Story, L. (2007, August 2). Lead paint prompts Mattel to recall 967,000 toys. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Story, L., & Barboza, D. (2007, August 15). Mattel recalls 19 million toys sent from China. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Update if applicable.
13
Additional resources
From Ashford’s Library – Films on Demand
Philanthropy, Inc.: The bottom line on corporate charity [Video file]. (2012). Retrieved from http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=100753&xtid=53327
Philanthropy, Inc.: The bottom line on corporate charity [Video file]. (2012). Retrieved from http://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=100753&xtid=53327
Any questions?
Please post your questions in the Ask the Instructor thread.
References
Hammond, S. C., & Christensen, L. J. (2016). Corporate and social responsibility: Road map for a sustainable future. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002, December). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2002/12/the-competitive-advantage-of- corporate-philanthropy
Westerhoff, N. (2008, Dec. 17). The “big five” personality traits. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-big-five/
16
16