Economic Framework Building Blocks

profilecoco nut
BuildingBlocksRubricFall2021.docx

Unsatisfactory

Limited

Sufficient

Excellent

Quality of Writing, Proofreading, and APA

Written responses contain numerous spelling errors. Uses longer statements and/or multiple sentences per bullet point. No citations or references are included.

Written responses include some spelling errors. May have longer statements rather than simple phrases. Citations and references are not sufficient or in proper APA format.

Written responses are largely free of spelling errors. Uses simple phrases. Abbreviations are mostly easy to follow. Proper APA citations are included. References include all assigned materials, but may contain some format errors.

Written responses are free of spelling errors. Uses simple phrases. Abbreviations are easy to follow. Proper APA citations are included. References include all assigned materials and any additional materials in APA format.

Organization

Building blocks are not organized by topic or content. Formatting or lack of formatting makes it difficult to determine if categories were used.

Categories may not be labeled, bulleted, or contain summary statements. Content within some categories has a logical relationship, but may be difficult to follow.

Categories are labeled, bulleted, and the summary statements are easy to distinguish from the content. Content within most categories has a logical relationship.

Visually pleasing. Looks professional. Categories are labeled, bulleted, and the summary statements are easy to distinguish from the content. Content within each category has a logical relationship.

Use of Materials

Does not cover all of the assigned materials.

Covers all assigned materials.

Critical Analysis in Category Development

No integration of assigned materials; grouped by author/article. May use categories given by the instructor (taxes, regulation, lobby).

Attempts to integrate assigned content yet keeps categories generic (pros/cons) or has some grouped by author/article. May have too few categories.

Critical analysis produces specific categories, but does not integrate all assigned material well.

Critical analysis integrates content into several specific categories. Categories are framed well with clarity and distinction.

Category Summary Statements & Overall Conclusion

No category summary statements or overall conclusion are given.

Category summary statements may be limited to phrasing from the authors/articles. The overall conclusion may not be supported by the categories and summary statements.

Category summary statements may vary from an interpretation of the content to exact phrasing of the authors. The overall conclusion draws from most of the categories and summary statements.

Summary statements clearly interprets the content for each category. The overall conclusion draws from all categories and summary statements and answers – how are Business & #### related?

Unsatisfactory

Limited

Sufficient

Excellent

Quality of

Writing

,

Proofreading

, and

APA

Written responses contain

numerous

spelling errors

.

Uses longer statements

and/or multiple sentences

per bullet point.

N

o citations

or references

are

included.

Written responses include

some

spelling errors

.

May

have lo

nger statements rather

than simple phrases.

Citations

and references

are

not sufficient

or in proper

APA format

.

Written responses are

largely free of

spelling

errors.

Uses simple phrases.

Abbreviations are mostly

easy to follow.

Proper APA

c

itations are included

.

References include

all

assigned materials

, but may

contain some

format

errors.

Written responses are free of

spelling errors.

Uses simple

phrases.

Abbreviations are easy to

follow.

Proper APA c

itations are

included

.

References include

all

assigned materials and any

additional

materials

in APA

format

.

Organization

Building blocks are not

organized by topic or

content. Formatting or lack

of fo

rmatting makes it

difficult to determine if

categories were used.

Categories

may not be

labele

d

, bulleted,

or

contain

summary statements

.

Content within

some

c

ategor

ies

has a logical

relationship

, but may be

difficult to follow.

Categories are

labele

d

,

bulleted, and the summary

statements are easy

to

distinguish from the content.

Content within

most

c

ategor

ies

has a logical

relationship

.

Visually pleasing. Looks

professional. Categories are

labele

d

, bulleted, and the summary

statements are easy

to distinguish

from the content.

Content within

each c

ategory

has a logical

relationship

.

Use of Materials

Does not cover all

of the

assigned materials.

Covers all assigned materials.

Critical

Analysis

in Category

Develop

ment

N

o integration of

assign

ed

material

s

; grouped

by

author

/ar

ticle

.

May use

categories given by the

instructor (taxes, regulation,

lobby).

Attemp

ts to

inte

grate

assigned

content

yet keeps

cat

egories generic

(pros/cons

)

or

has some

grouped

by author

/article

.

May have

too

few categories.

Cr

i

tical analysis produces

specific categories

,

but

does

not integrate

all

assigned

material

well

.

Critical analysis integrates content

into several specific categories.

Categories are framed well with

clarity and distinct

ion.

Category

Summary

Statements

&

Overall

Conclusion

No

category

summary

statements

or

overall

conclusion

are given.

Category s

ummary

statements

may be

limited to

phrasing from the

authors

/articles

.

T

h

e

overall

conclusion

may

n

ot be

supported by the categories

and summary statement

s.

Cate

gory s

ummary

statements

may

vary from an

interpretation of the content

to exact phrasing of the

authors.

The overall

con

clusion draws from most

of

the categories and

summary statement

s

.

Summary statements

clearly

interpret

s

the content

for each

category

.

T

h

e

o

verall concl

usion

draws from

all

cat

egor

ies and

summary

statements

and

answers

how

are

Business & ####

related?

Unsatisfactory Limited Sufficient Excellent

Quality of

Writing,

Proofreading, and

APA

Written responses contain

numerous spelling errors.

Uses longer statements

and/or multiple sentences

per bullet point. No citations

or references are included.

Written responses include

some spelling errors. May

have longer statements rather

than simple phrases.

Citations and references are

not sufficient or in proper

APA format.

Written responses are

largely free of spelling

errors. Uses simple phrases.

Abbreviations are mostly

easy to follow. Proper APA

citations are included.

References include all

assigned materials, but may

contain some format errors.

Written responses are free of

spelling errors. Uses simple

phrases. Abbreviations are easy to

follow. Proper APA citations are

included. References include all

assigned materials and any

additional materials in APA

format.

Organization Building blocks are not

organized by topic or

content. Formatting or lack

of formatting makes it

difficult to determine if

categories were used.

Categories may not be

labeled, bulleted, or contain

summary statements.

Content within some

categories has a logical

relationship, but may be

difficult to follow.

Categories are labeled,

bulleted, and the summary

statements are easy to

distinguish from the content.

Content within most

categories has a logical

relationship.

Visually pleasing. Looks

professional. Categories are

labeled, bulleted, and the summary

statements are easy to distinguish

from the content. Content within

each category has a logical

relationship.

Use of Materials Does not cover all of the

assigned materials.

Covers all assigned materials.

Critical Analysis

in Category

Development

No integration of assigned

materials; grouped by

author/article. May use

categories given by the

instructor (taxes, regulation,

lobby).

Attempts to integrate

assigned content yet keeps

categories generic

(pros/cons) or has some

grouped by author/article.

May have too few categories.

Critical analysis produces

specific categories, but does

not integrate all assigned

material well.

Critical analysis integrates content

into several specific categories.

Categories are framed well with

clarity and distinction.

Category

Summary

Statements &

Overall

Conclusion

No category summary

statements or overall

conclusion are given.

Category summary

statements may be limited to

phrasing from the

authors/articles. The overall

conclusion may not be

supported by the categories

and summary statements.

Category summary

statements may vary from an

interpretation of the content

to exact phrasing of the

authors. The overall

conclusion draws from most

of the categories and

summary statements.

Summary statements clearly

interprets the content for each

category. The overall conclusion

draws from all categories and

summary statements and answers

– how are Business & ####

related?