BSN422 Module 4 Assignment 1

BSN422Module4Assignment1.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >BSN422 Module 4 Assignment 1

Module Four: Quantitative Research: Design, Procedures, Interpretation, and Evidence-based Practice

Module 4 Overview

Introduction: Module 4 continues with an exploration of quantitative research designs, methodological procedures, data interpretation, and application to evidence-based practice.

Learning Outcomes

After completing this module, you will be able to:

Evaluate the relationships between nursing research designs in quantitative studies and EBP.

Reading & Resources

Read: Chapter 6 (pp. 131-153), Chapter 7 (pp. 157-185), Chapter 8 (pp. 189-226) Chapter 12 (pp.323-350)& Chapter 13 (pp. 351-380) In Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning

Harris, M. F., Chan, B. C., Laws, R. A., Williams, A. M., Davies, G. P., Jayasinghe, U. W., … Milat, A. (2013). The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial). BMC Public Health, 13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-375

>>>>>>

Assignment 1

Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor.

Examine "The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses" which can be accessed in the Module 4 Overview. In a 5 page paper (excluding title page and references), evaluate the study according to research design methods, procedures and study results, for example, see Evaluating a quantitative study (Houser, 2018, p. 345 & p. 377), Include a discussion on how the study contributes to evidence-based practice (EBP).

Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page, body of the paper, and reference page. Use the rubric below to help you complete your assignment.

Rubric or Grading Criteria:

Competency	28 points	21 points	14 points	0 points	Total
Evaluates research design	Evaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser 2018, p. 345).	Evaluates research design of study using most (75%)components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).	Evaluates research design of study using some (50%)components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).	No paper submitted or content missing less than 25% of the components evaluated	/28
Evaluates methods/procedures and results	Evaluates methods/procedure, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser 2018, p.377).	Evaluates methods/procedure and results of the study using most (75%) components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).	Evaluates methods/procedures and results of the study using some (50%) components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).	No paper submitted or content missing less than 25% of the components evaluated	/28
Clinical practice implications	Discusses how the study contributes to EBP and clinical practice	Discusses EBP in general but not how the study contributes to EBP.	Discusses research and evidence but not clinical implications in practice	No paper submitted or content missing	/28
Competency	7 points	5 points	2.5 points	0 points
APA format	Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA	Minimal APA errors Two unique errors i.e. abbreviations and in text citation	Many APA errors More than two APA errors	Complete lack of understanding APA format	/7
Competency	3 points	2 points	1 points	0 points
Organization	Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.	Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support	Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions	Organization does not meet requirements	/3
Grammar	Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English	Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding	Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding	Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding	/3
References	References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary	Adequate references	Minimal use of appropriate references	Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant	/3
Total Possible =	/100

Submission status

>>>>>>>>