workplace law assignment

profileyolac
BSL202L42016.pptx

BSL202 Workplace Law

Lecture 4

Formation of the contract

Advertisements usually form no part of the employment contract

Invitations to treat only

Discussion in interviews will not automatically become part of the contract

Representations only

Pre-employment screening

Statutory law may provide some relief to employment applicants who have been promised ’benefits’ of employment

Advertisements, interviews and other negotiations

Schedule 2 ACCA (Cth.) s31 (Australian consumer law) prohibits conduct which is likely to mislead applicants in relation to offers of employment

Interviews and negotiations may also be subject to Schedule 2 ACCA (Cth.) s18(1) which prohibits misleading & deceptive conduct in trade and commerce

O'Neill v MBF (2002)

ACCC, “Misleading job and business opportunity adverts” (2011)

Discrimination in employment

Both State (Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA)) and federal legislation (e.g. Race Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth.)) have prohibitions.

Various grounds are prohibited (e.g. sexual harassment, racial, age, disability), but not all unfairness, injustice, or inequality.

Advertising, application forms, and pre-screening procedures & interviews in relation to applicants, and conduct/treatment once a person has been employed, are covered.

Ronalds and Raper, Ch. 4

Direct and indirect discrimination

Australian Iron and Steel v Banovic (1990)

Indirect discrimination involves a policy, program, requirement or condition impacts on a particular subset of employees and they are disadvantaged as a result

Direct discrimination involves disadvantage resulting from the possession of a particular characteristic

Elements of the contract

Offer & acceptance (agreement)

Consideration

Intention to create legal relations

Certainty and completeness

Legality and absence of vitiating factors

Offer

An offer must be clear, e.g. job description (not too vague)

It states the terms of the contract, e.g. wage rate

It does not merely supply information, e.g. not just promotional material

It should be distinguished from an invitation to treat (e.g. a job advertisement), e.g. addressed to applicant individually

It can be revoked at any time prior to acceptance

No need for writing

It lapses after a reasonable period of time if no specific time available set

Acceptance

Acceptance must be certain and unconditional (no counter offers)

Acceptance must be effectively communicated (by email, sms, verbally, but with sufficient detail)

The offeror may prescribe the method of acceptance, e.g. by email

nb. Postal acceptance rule

Consideration

Promises of exchange between both parties form consideration for an agreement

A bargain for the performance of work is involved in making a contract of employment

Payment for work performed during a work experience project will not form an employment contract if only one party makes a promise: Dietrich v Dare (1980)

Consideration need not be fair or equitable BUT statutory requirements impact. An employee must be paid in money: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s323(1)

Certainty and completeness

While courts can endeavour to give meaning to a contract, terms that are too vague will not be enforceable and may be severed to maintain the enforceability of the contract.

Contract terms may be implied where necessary, e.g. reasonable notice where no term has been expressly agreed for terminaton.

Intention

A mutual intention to create a legally enforceable agreement is required.

Volunteers, family members & work experience workers will be presumed NOT to have this intention

Teen Ranch v Brown (1995)

Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community (2002)

Legality

A contract for an illegal purpose will be unenforceable.

A term against public policy will be unenforceable.

Terms seeking to restrain the trade of the employee will not be enforceable unless they protect a legitimate interest of the employer and are reasonable.

Contracts employing illegal immigrants for work may be against public policy (legislation prohibits) and unenforceable.

nb. An immigrant may still have statutory rights to be paid etc., pursuant to being employed. Legislation may still recognise an immigrant as an employee for its purposes.

Capacity and youth

Contracts of employment with persons less than 18 years of age will only be enforceable if for the benefit of the minor (a beneficial contract of service)

State legislation prohibits particular forms of child employment and requires a minimum age: e.g. Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA)

Capacity and associations

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth.) provides that companies can be employers and have the legal capacity of a natural person

Associations that are not incorporated do not form a separate legal entity. The members of the association can enter into binding contracts with employees.

Genuine consent

Serious mistake can vitiate a contract if it is fundamental to the contract.

Misrepresentation of a relevant fact can vitiate a contract, e.g. employee age/experience

Duress (threat), undue influence (force) or unconscionability (advantage) can vitiate a contract.

Unconscionable conduct by one party taking advantage of the disability of the other will be a vitiating factor.

Terms of the contract

The terms of the contract may be either express or implied

Express terms are those the parties agree to, either verbally or in writing

Courts take a reasonable person’s interpretation of contract terms (not a subjective interpretation)

Courts look for the intention of the parties in the terms in dealing with ambiguity. An ambiguity may be interpreted to benefit the employee if the employer has prepared the contract.

Other terms?

If parties have had discussions that have not been transferred into writing, the content of those discussions is unlikely to be enforceable.

Written terms will generally be treated as all of the terms (the parole evidence rule), unless there is contrary evidence.

Partly written, partly oral contracts are sometimes recognised where it is clear both parties did not see the writing as containing all terms.

If an ‘entire agreement’ clause is included, there will be no implication of additional terms.

Work policies

Company policies incorporated as terms into contracts of employment?

Yes, reciprocal commitments can be created by policies that are promissory: Riverwood v McCormick (2000), Goldman Sacks v Nikolich (2007)

Other factors, like timing of introduction of the policy, consistency in notification of policy operation, may be relevant: Akmeemana v Murray (2009), Romero v Farstad (2014)

Implied terms

Terms can be implied, but only in a very few circumstances

Custom & practice

By law

In fact; the court recognises the intention of the parties was to have a particular term (in a specific agreement)

Customary terms

So common that unwritten

Well known on an industry-wide basis (not limited to a workplace)

Custom forms background of the contract

Term implied only where as a question of fact there is notoriety, certainty, uniformness and it is reasonable: Con-Stan Industries v Norwich Winterthur (1986)

Universal acceptance is not necessary

No contrary express terms, e.g. in an enterprise agreement

Terms implied on the facts

For terms implied ‘in fact’, terms must be necessary (Byrne v Australian Airlines (1995)

Upheld BP Refinery v Hastings (1977) principle

Necessary for the contract

Capable of clear expression

Not contradictory of express term

Just & equitable

So obvious it goes without saying

Terms implied by law

Terms may be implied by:

Legislation

Common law

Remuneration

Reasonable notice

Employer/employee duties

Variation of the contract

Mutual agreement to modify the terms of the contract

Not unilaterally

nb. flexibility in employer’s ability to give lawful & reasonable instructions. This does not vary the contract terms.

A new contract results if there are significant changes to the fundamental terms of agreement.

Quinn v Jack Chia (1992)

Statutes, awards and agreements

Statutes form minimum standards

Primacy of statute law over contract

Award and enterprise agreement terms do not become part of the contract unless there is an expressed intention

Byrne v Australian Airlines (1995)