Lead innovative thinking and practice

profilePhaneendra
BSBINN801_LEARNERWORKBOOK1.docx

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION for students

Throughout your training we are committed to your learning by providing a training and assessment framework that ensures the knowledge gained through training is translated into practical on the job improvements.

You are going to be assessed for:

Your skills and knowledge using written and observation activities that apply to the workplace.

Your ability to apply your learning.

Your ability to recognise common principles and actively use these on the job.

All of your assessment and training is provided as a positive learning tool. Your assessor will guide your learning and provide feedback on your responses to the assessment materials until you have been deemed competent in this unit.

HOW YOU WILL BE ASSESSED

The process we follow is known as competency-based assessment. This means that evidence of your current skills and knowledge will be measured against national standards of best practice, not against the learning you have undertaken either recently or in the past. Some of the assessment will be concerned with how you apply your skills and knowledge in the workplace, and some in the training room as required by each unit.

The assessment tasks have been designed to enable you to demonstrate the required skills and knowledge and produce the critical evidence to successfully demonstrate competency at the required standard.

Your assessor will ensure that you are ready for assessment and will explain the assessment process. Your assessment tasks will outline the evidence to be collected and how it will be collected, for example; a written activity, case study, or demonstration and observation.

The assessor will also have determined if you have any special needs to be considered during assessment. Changes can be made to the way assessment is undertaken to account for special needs and this is called making Reasonable Adjustment.

What happens if your result is ‘Not Yet Competent’ for one or more assessment tasks?

Our assessment process is designed to answer the question “has the desired learning outcome been achieved yet?” If the answer is “Not yet”, then we work with you to see how we can get there.

In the case that one or more of your assessments has been marked ‘NYC’, your trainer will provide you with the necessary feedback and guidance, in order for you to resubmit your responses.

What if you disagree on the assessment outcome?

You can appeal against a decision made in regards to your assessment. An appeal should only be made if you have been assessed as ‘Not Yet Competent’ against a specific unit and you feel you have sufficient grounds to believe that you are entitled to be assessed as competent. You must be able to adequately demonstrate that you have the skills and experience to be able to meet the requirements of units you are appealing the assessment of.

Your trainer will outline the appeals process, which is available to the student. You can request a form to make an appeal and submit it to your trainer, the course coordinator, or the administration officer. The RTO will examine the appeal and you will be advised of the outcome within 14 days. Any additional information you wish to provide may be attached to the appeal form.

What if I believe I am already competent before training?

If you believe you already have the knowledge and skills to be able to demonstrate competence in this unit, speak with your trainer, as you may be able to apply for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL).

Assessor Responsibilities

Assessors need to be aware of their responsibilities and carry them out appropriately. To do this they need to:

Ensure that participants are assessed fairly based on the outcome of the language, literacy and numeracy review completed at enrolment.

Ensure that all documentation is signed by the student, trainer, workplace supervisor and assessor when units and certificates are complete, to ensure that there is no follow-up required from an administration perspective.

Ensure that their own qualifications are current.

When required, request the manager or supervisor to determine that the student is ‘satisfactorily’ demonstrating the requirements for each unit. ‘Satisfactorily’ means consistently meeting the standard expected from an experienced operator.

When required, ensure supervisors and students sign off on third party assessment forms or third party report.

Follow the recommendations from moderation and validation meetings.

How should I format my assessments?

Your assessments should be typed in a 11 or 12 size font for ease of reading. You must include a footer on each page with the student name, unit code and date. Your assessment needs to be submitted as a hardcopy or electronic copy as requested by your trainer.

How long should my answers be?

The length of your answers will be guided by the description in each assessment, for example:

Type of Answer

Answer Guidelines

Short Answer

4 typed lines = 50 words, or

5 lines of handwritten text

Long Answer

8 typed lines = 100 words, or

10 lines of handwritten text = of a foolscap page

Brief Report

500 words = 1 page typed report, or

50 lines of handwritten text = 1foolscap handwritten pages

Mid Report

1,000 words = 2 page typed report

100 lines of handwritten text = 3 foolscap handwritten pages

Long Report

2,000 words = 4 page typed report

200 lines of handwritten text = 6 foolscap handwritten pages

How should I reference the sources of information I use in my assessments?

Include a reference list at the end of your work on a separate page. You should reference the sources you have used in your assessments in the Harvard Style. For example:

Website Name – Page or Document Name, Retrieved insert the date. Webpage link.

For a book: Author surname, author initial Year of publication, Title of book, Publisher, City, State

assessment guide

The following table shows you how to achieve a satisfactory result against the criteria for each type of assessment task. The following is a list of general assessment methods that can be used in assessing a unit of competency. Check your assessment tasks to identify the ones used in this unit of competency.

Assessment Method

Satisfactory Result

Non-Satisfactory Result

You will receive an overall result of Competent or Not Yet Competent for the unit. The assessment process is made up of a number of assessment methods. You are required to achieve a satisfactory result in each of these to be deemed competent overall. Your assessment may include the following assessment types.

Questions

All questions answered correctly

Incorrect answers for one or more questions

Answers address the question in full; referring to appropriate sources from your workbook and/or workplace

Answers do not address the question in full. Does not refer to appropriate or correct sources.

Third Party Report

Supervisor or manager observes work performance and confirms that you consistently meet the standards expected from an experienced operator

Could not demonstrate consistency. Could not demonstrate the ability to achieve the required standard

Written Activity

The assessor will mark the activity against the detailed guidelines/instructions

Does not follow guidelines/instructions

Attachments if requested are attached

Requested supplementary items are not attached

All requirements of the written activity are addressed/covered.

Response does not address the requirements in full; is missing a response for one or more areas.

Responses must refer to appropriate sources from your workbook and/or workplace

One or more of the requirements are answered incorrectly.

Does not refer to or utilise appropriate or correct sources of information

Observation/Demonstration

All elements, criteria, knowledge and performance evidence and critical aspects of evidence, are demonstrated at the appropriate AQF level

Could not demonstrate elements, criteria, knowledge and performance evidence and/or critical aspects of evidence, at the appropriate AQF level

Case Study

All comprehension questions answered correctly; demonstrating an application of knowledge of the topic case study.

Lack of demonstrated comprehension of the underpinning knowledge (remove) required to complete the case study questions correctly. One or more questions are answered incorrectly.

Answers address the question in full; referring to appropriate sources from your workbook and/or workplace

Answers do not address the question in full; do not refer to appropriate sources.

Practical Activity

All tasks in the practical activity must be competed and evidence of completion must be provided to your trainer/assessor.

All tasks have been completed accurately and evidence provided for each stated task.

Tasks have not been completed effectively and evidence of completion has not been provided.

Attachments if requested are attached

Requested supplementary items are not attached

Assessment cover sheet

Student’s name:

Assessors Name:

Date:

Is the Student ready for assessment?

Yes

No

Has the assessment process been explained?

Yes

No

Does the Student understand which evidence is to be collected and how?

Yes

No

Have the Student’s rights and the appeal system been fully explained?

Yes

No

Have you discussed any special needs to be considered during assessment?

Yes

No

The following documents must be completed and attached

Written Activity 1 (Short answer questions) Checklist

The student will complete the written activity provided to them by the assessor.

The Written Activity Checklist will be completed by the assessor.

S

NYS

Written Activity 2 (Case study) Checklist

The student will complete the written activity provided to them by the assessor.

The Written Activity Checklist will be completed by the assessor.

S

NYS

Questioning Checklist

The student will answer a range of questions either verbally or written.

The Questioning Checklist will be completed by the assessor.

S

NYS

I agree to undertake assessment in the knowledge that information gathered will only be used for professional development purposes and can only be accessed by the RTO:

Overall Outcome Competent Not yet Competent

Student Signature:

Date:

Assessor Signature:

Date:

Result and Feedback

Feedback to Student:

Overall Outcome Competent Not yet Competent

Assessor Signature:

Date:

Written activity 1 – Developmental activities (Short Answer Questions)

ACTIVITY WORKBOOK

Definition

This workbook is anxious with how we Lead Innovative Thinking, at an individual and team level. Thinking and Innovation are not the same, though thinking rarely comes about other than as a result of some kind of innovative activity, however small.

Contents

The activity workbook contains Development Activities, which are designed to be highly practical.

The development activities include a range of exercises which approve various techniques to enable you to Reflect on the current situation in your team and compares it to what you want to achieve; so that you can create a plan for taking action.

There are suggestions as to how you can Monitor the progress of your development activities and Evaluate the impact that you are having. It is hoped that doing so will enable you to sustain the behaviors and practices that will help you strengthen your effectiveness as a team.

Please note:

1. The workbook is designed such that it can be valuable during whole training and development activities, and during individual supervision or performance appraisal;

2. Depending on their demand, the reader can start at the beginning and work their way through the activity workbook.

Activity 1

Thinking about yourselves as a team, rather than about individual team members, reflect on the last three to six months, and the number of occasions when you have devoted time, as a team, to reflecting on innovations and ideas for improvements (a) in the way the team functions, and (b) in the quality of the service that you offer – either by an individual team member, or by a few team members, or the team as a whole. Make a note of them.

Innovation suggested by an individual

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Improvement suggested by an individual

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Innovation suggested by a number of team members

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Improvement suggested by a number of team members

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Innovation suggested by the team as a whole

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Improvement suggested by the team as a whole

Who stimulated the idea?

What action was taken?

Activity 2

Talk to a colleague or a friend or associate, who has a strong commitment to promoting innovation and Thinking - Improvement.

Ask them about practical ways in which they enable their team to have a stronger orientation and improvement-orientated action.

In column 1, make a note of the new information and insights you have gained

In column 2, make a note of (a) practical steps that you could take, based on what you have learnt, and (b) any special factors that might apply to your team, and

how they might be addressed

Innovation

Thinking & Improvement

Activity 3

When was the last time that you recognized in some other way, the achievements of a company for achieving an innovation or improvement? Please detail.

When was the last time the company celebrated an individual’s or the whole team’s success in achieving an innovation or improvement? Please detail.

If the answer to either question is ‘never’, or ‘not for a long time’, consider

1. Why this might be the case

2. The impact on team confidence in the company and sense of team-efficacy.

Activity 4

As an individual, what are your implications on:

Developing a greater level of skill capability within the company?

· What are the underlying principles, e.g., help and guidance, opportunities to practice, thinking?

· What lessons can be learnt?

· What are the values for the company?

Developing a greater sense of team confidence and team efficiency,

· What are the underlying principles, e.g., brainstorming, social support, encouragement, persistence?

· What lessons can be learnt?

· What are the implications for our team?

Developing a team identity as one of being an effective innovator and improver of services.

· What are the underlying principles, e.g., self-belief, sense of identity as innovators and improvers?

· What lessons can be learnt?

· What are the implications for our team?

Plot a Team Action Plan for addressing Innovation Thinking in a company,

Conduct as follows:

· Set of goals and objectives

· Series of specific actions

· Criteria for judging success

· Time span for achieving each of the goals and objectives.

Activity 5

Monitor innovation progress to each:

Developing a greater level of competence within the team in being innovative

Developing a greater level of competence within the team in making improvements to the service

Developing a greater sense of team confidence and team-efficacy (Team

Potency) in being innovative

Developing a greater sense of team confidence and team-efficacy (Team Potency) in making improvements to the service

Developing a team identity as one of being an effective innovator

Developing a team identity as one of being an effective improver of services.

Activity 6

Devise an Action Plan.

Devise an action plan your plan should include specific actions that focuses on Leadership enablers of thinking and practice.

Determining what are the capabilities

Determining what the culture is like

Determining how the capabilities interact with each other in encouraging innovation

Determining how the culture affects the organization capabilities in encouraging innovation

Considering ways in which changes in the team’s Relational Transparency capabilities could impact on quality

Considering ways in which changes in the organization self-awareness that could impact on quality

written activity 1 – DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES

(Short Answer Questions)

For this assessment, the student must complete this practical activity.

The development activities include a range of exercises which approve various techniques to enable you to Reflect on the current situation in your team and compares it to what you want to achieve; so that you can create a plan for taking action.

Student’s name:

Assessor’s name:

Has the student satisfactorily completed the written activity?

Yes

No

Did the Student provide evidence of their ability to:

Thinking about him/her as a team, rather than about individual team members, reflect on the last three to six months, and the number of occasions when you have devoted time, as a team, to reflecting on innovations and ideas for improvements (a) in the way the team functions, and (b) in the quality of the service that you offer – either by an individual team member, or by a few team members, or the team as a whole. Make a note of them.

Talk to a colleague or a friend or associate, who has a strong commitment to promoting innovation and Thinking - Improvement.

Ask them about practical ways in which they enable their team to have a stronger orientation and improvement-orientated action.

Recognize in some other way, the achievements of a company for achieving an innovation or improvement? Please detail.

Develop a greater level of skill capability within the company?

· What are the underlying principles, e.g., help and guidance, opportunities to practice, thinking?

· What lessons can be learnt?

· What are the values for the company?

Monitor the innovation progress.

Devise an Action Plan.

Feedback to Student:

Result Satisfactory Not Yet Satisfactory

Assessor’s Signature:

Date:

CASE STUDY activity

Instructions:

Student is advised to refer the following information and attempt all the activities, provided therein. This contains case study on Nike that requires you need to prepare report of your findings with appropriate examples.

The submission should be neatly typed and appropriately referenced.

CASE STUDY:

NIKE - Product development from concept to consumer

Introduction

Nike is the world's largest sports and Fitness Company, earning $US14 billion in revenue. The company, with one of the world's most identifiable logos - the 'swoosh', is a leader in sports equipment research and development (R&D). Nike identified a gap in the sports shoe market - a shoe which mimics barefoot running to strengthen runners' feet and legs, giving them more power and speed while reducing the risk of injury. After extensive R&D, the shoe, Nike Free, was developed. Nike Free was given an initial, strictly controlled, limited 12-month release before being promoted to consumers worldwide.

Nike's 'swoosh' is one of the world's most identifiable logos and, in just 32 years, Nike has grown to be the industry's largest sports and Fitness Company. Revenue for Nike in financial year 2005 was $US 13.7 billion. Nike directly employs approximately 24,300 people and Nike's suppliers, shippers, retailers and service providers employ close to one million people on six continents.

Nike's mission is:

'To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world.'

According to Bill Bowerman, one of Nike's founders, "If you have a body, you are an athlete."

In addition, Nike's corporate responsibility mission is to help the company achieve profitable and sustainable growth and to protect and enhance the brand and company by new ideas and innovation. Nike believes that corporate responsibility work should not be separate from the business, but should instead be fully integrated into it. The company's sustainable growth suggests that Nike will be around for generations to come. The principles of sustainability also require Nike to find ways of generating profit while minimizing any potentially negative impact on communities or nature.

Nike's mission statement is intentionally broad and outward looking, focusing on the needs of athletes, and, through its corporate responsibility work, consideration is given to the needs of communities around the world. Nike's focus is to continually seek to innovate, design and develop products to improve athletic performance. Its overriding desire is to design products with true performance innovation and technology benefits which help the athlete perform better. With its latest innovation, Nike scientists and designers by brainstorming, have developed Nike Free, a sports shoe described as a foot-strengthening training tool. Tagged 'natural technology', Nike Free has been designed to copy barefoot running. By running barefoot, the foot is strengthened, gaining greater flexibility and range of motion which leads to better performance because you are less prone to injuries.

Anticipating the needs of the consumer

Innovation is what sets Nike apart in the industry. It started in 1971 when Bill Bowerman, then a University of Oregon track coach, poured rubber into his wife's waffle iron hoping to create a new and better sole for running shoes for his track athletes. The result - a light waffle sole that transformed the running world. When thinking about what consumers might need in their footwear, the next innovation came in the form of Nike Air, a durable and lightweight cushioning system for athletic shoes.

Nike had anticipated the need for a shoe which had a cushioning system which lasted longer than foam, reduced shock and distributed pressure.

Research and development

How does Nike develop its products and decide what does and doesn't make the cut when it comes to innovation? The Nike Sports Research Laboratory (NSRL) is located on the Nike campus in Portland, Oregon in the United States of America. The research and development (R&D) center’s role is to identify the physiological needs of athletes. The NSRL works directly with Nike's design teams and has established partnerships with major universities throughout Asia, Europe and North America.

To research and develop products, the scientists have an incredible array of measurement and analysis tools. Their data collection includes virtually every variety of muscle sensor, pressure platform, breath analyzer, foot scanner and thermal imaging device. There are high-speed video cameras that capture soccer kick data at 1,000 frames per second and a scanner that produces, in just seconds, a perfect 3D digital image of your foot.

The NSRL takes an idea, and researches and prepares a design brief. The brief is then passed over to the company's Innovation Kitchen - an incubator for new projects.

In the first phase of developing what was to become Nike Free, the 'cooks' in the Kitchen took the NSRL description of 'natural technology' and started asking what sort of shoe people might be looking for next. In the process of talking to athletes and coaches, the designers spoke to Vin Lananna, then the track coach at Stanford University, who told them about his unusual training method - having athletes run on grass without shoes. According to Lananna, the athletes were stronger, healthier and less injuryprone. This was a great idea but contrary to Nike's business - making and selling sports shoes.

However, the idea led to an extensive biomechanical research project to see exactly what happens when we run barefoot. Sports shoes provide a certain amount of control or cushioning based on the notion that they are needed to complement the natural action of the foot. Nike researchers wanted to know why Lananna's athletes, who ran barefoot in training, raced faster.

The researchers brought in 10 men and 10 women to run barefoot on grass to see exactly how the body reacts without shoes on. They were videotaped with high-speed cameras to capture their movements; they had reflective markers attached to their joints to allow easy calculation of joint angles during their stride, and wafer-thin pressure sensors attached to the bottoms of their feet to measure their impact with the ground. At the end of the experiment, Nike had the most comprehensive picture of the biomechanics of barefoot running ever developed.

Testing the prototypes

Before Nike Free was known to the athletic world or commercially released, Nike undertook extensive independent testing. The company used elite athletes as well as everyday runners and a few sports journalists, i.e. people who exercise and run regularly, to undertake product testing. In a six-month trial, 110 every-day runners used the shoe. One group, consisting of 30 men and 27 women, wore the Nike Free shoes for four 30-minute runs, four times a week. The control group - 30 men and 23 women - used their regular personal training shoes. Outside the four 30-minute runs a week, both groups continued their usual workout schedules. All participants were tested at the start of the six-month period on their abilities in many physical areas - shuttle runs, lateral running short sprints, and leg

strength - and were tested again at the end of the six months. These tests measured qualities such as speed, development, coordination and optimal speed.

Researchers found some slight improvement in the control group, registering a little more speed and a little more coordination - but not enough to be statistically relevant. However, the test results from the group wearing the Nike Free shoes showed improvement in all the parameters measured, and improvements in speed, lateral movement, and coordination were significant - in the 10 to 20 percent range. That is a significant improvement considering the shoes were worn only two hours a week over a six-month period. An improvement of one percent in speed could mean a meter’s difference in a 100-metre sprint - often the difference between first and fourth place.

In simple terms, Nike Free was acting not only as a running shoe, but as a training technique! Athletes in the test group using Nike Free were found to be stronger and more flexible. One of the researchers put it this way: "Nike Free is a gym for your feet."

Nike's challenge:

"Nike had developed a product that measurably improved athletic performance but flew in the face of all conventional thinking."

Ensuring correct product positioning

Nike was conscious that Nike Free needed to be positioned as an additional training shoe in your kit bag, not necessarily as a replacement to your traditional running shoes. Unlike typical athletic shoes, Nike Free shoes allows the foot to move, flex and grip just as it would if running barefoot. The advertising and marketing campaigns were carefully crafted to ensure that consumers recognized Nike Free as a training shoe which could help build additional strength and therefore the ability to train longer - not as a replacement to its other sports shoes. This product positioning was a balancing act, requiring careful communication and application.

Education was the key to positioning the shoe in the market. Nike Free was launched under limited and very tight distribution in the lead up to the major advertising campaign. The shoe was distributed initially only through running specialty stores before being broadened to general sporting goods stores. Nike Free was also placed with key people ideas such as running coaches, podiatrists and physiotherapists with the aim of introducing Nike Free as a new product and training concept before taking it to the broader market.

Part of the strategy was to take this 'barefoot' shoe directly to runners. To do this, Nike used the tried and true, labor intensive method of driving mobile vans to areas in the USA, Europe, as well as Australia, which attracted large amounts of runners. (In the early days of the company, co-founder Phil Knight sold shoes from a van parked at a local athletics track.) Staffed by running and footwear experts, offering gait analyses and the chance to test Nike Free, the mobile vans took the 'barefoot' shoe straight to consumers. This basic tactic engaged consumers on their terms and in their own territory, letting the Nike Free story be told on an individual basis.

Reaching the consumer

Advertising is synonymous with Nike. In partnership with its advertising agency, Nike has created some of the world's most attention-grabbing advertising. You may recall some Nike television advertisements: the cinema epic of soccer players battling it out in the hull of a ship or Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi playing tennis in the streets of Manhattan.

Nike does not rely solely on television, cinema and outdoor advertising. Nike understands that its consumers seek information online and as such it targets different online audiences around the world. The Internet has become an essential component in Nike's marketing campaign.

Nike produces a range of products which are unique to a particular sport or athletic endeavor. Nike's marketing considers the different needs of athletes and consumers and uses its website to communicate with these groups via in depth content, product information and athlete insights.

Staff product awareness

Having a new and innovative product is one thing, but a company must ensure staff working in sports stores understand the product, its benefits and how it should be used. To do this, Nike created a flashanimated multi-media learning environment. Called Nike Sports Knowledge Underground (Nike SKU), it mirrors a subway rail system with each 'stop' representing a training activity where new shoes such as Nike Free are displayed. Participants are taken on a three-minute course explaining design, benefits, features and top selling points of the shoe. At the end, they take a brief quiz to ensure they know about the product and can immediately use the information in customer dealings on the shop floor. A technical specification sheet can be printed to help with customer queries. Appreciating that many sales people are young, Nike's SKU is like a video game, with information packaged in short sound bites.

Question:

Please, demonstrate and evaluate the stages involved in the product development, from conception of an innovation product, through the research and development stage, to brain storming, production and market risk. (Min 1200 Words, all areas are to be covered, All underlined)

Also

Identify 2 x areas for improvement for NIKE best practice management and explain in a short business report (500 words) what they are about and how they can be successfully implemented into Australian context.

CASE STUDY activity

Case Study Checklist

For this assessment, the student must complete the business report and Case study activity.

The Case study activity is a stand-alone activity that will allow the student to display the required knowledge and skills that are essential when deciding overall competency.

Student’s name:

Assessor’s name:

Has the student satisfactorily completed the written activity?

Yes

No

Did the Student provide evidence of their ability to:

demonstrate and evaluate the stages involved in the:

Product development, from conception of an innovation product

The research and development stage

Brain storming

Production

Market risk

Identify 2 x areas for improvement for NIKE best practice management and explain in a short business report (500 words) what they are about and how they can be successfully implemented into Australian context.

Feedback to Student:

Result Satisfactory Not Yet Satisfactory

Assessor’s Signature:

Date:

Questions

The following questions may be answered verbally with your assessor or you may write down your answers. Please discuss this with your assessor before you commence. Short Answers are required which is approximately 4 typed lines = 50 words, or 5 lines of handwritten text.

Your assessor will take down dot points as a minimum if you choose to answer them verbally.

Answer the following questions either verbally with your assessor or in writing.

1. Compare and contrast current and past theories and thinking about innovation

2. Explain how theory and thinking on innovation and creativity can contribute to applied practice

3. Discuss the impact of leadership style on innovation in organisations, including how specific approaches may encourage or inhibit innovation

4. Discuss the relevance of organisational and industry context on innovation

5. Analyse the internal and external conditions or factors that impact on organisational innovation

6. Outline strategies for identifying, assessing and managing risks associated with innovation

7. Provide examples of innovation drivers in an organisation

8. Provide examples of innovation enablers in an organisation

9. List and describe mechanisms at system or process level that can support innovative practices

10. Discuss typical challenges and barriers to innovation within an organisation and ways of overcoming these challenges and barriers.

Questions Checklist

Questioning Checklist

The assessor needs to indicate whether they have conducted the questioning as written questions or as verbal questions by ticking the box below.

Written Questioning

Verbal Questioning

The assessor must provide evidence with the assessment tool. For written questions, the assessor must provide the student’s original written responses. For verbal questioning, the assessor must provide dot points as a minimum on the student’s responses.

For details on how to conduct and contextualise this form of assessment, please refer to the questioning checklist explanation in the assessor guide.

Student’s name:

Assessor’s name:

If questions are answered verbally, the assessor must write detailed answers in the sections provided below. The space below does not indicate the size of the answer anticipated. Keep typing and the space will expand. If answers are recorded separate to this document, they must be attached to the assessment documents.

Satisfactory response

Yes

No

1

Compare and contrast current and past theories and thinking about innovation

2

Explain how theory and thinking on innovation and creativity can contribute to applied practice

3

Discuss the impact of leadership style on innovation in organisations, including how specific approaches may encourage or inhibit innovation

4

Discuss the relevance of organisational and industry context on innovation

5

Analyse the internal and external conditions or factors that impact on organisational innovation

6

Outline strategies for identifying, assessing and managing risks associated with innovation

7

Provide examples of innovation drivers in an organisation

8

Provide examples of innovation enablers in an organisation

9

List and describe mechanisms at system or process level that can support innovative practices

10

Discuss typical challenges and barriers to innovation within an organisation and ways of overcoming these challenges and barriers.

Feedback to Student:

Result Satisfactory Not Yet Satisfactory

Assessor’s Signature:

Date:

19 BSBINN801 Lead innovative thinking and practice Version 1.0