Week 4 PPOL 650 Briefing Paper Annotated Bibli
PPOL 650
Briefing Paper Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric
|
Student: |
|||
|
Criteria |
Novice |
Competent |
Proficient |
|
Formatting, Spelling, and Grammar |
0–5 points · Evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of graduate-level work. |
6–7 points · Acceptable work in most areas. · Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding writing style, current Turabian formatting, grammar, and spelling. |
8–10 points · Superior work in all areas. · Consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding writing style, current Turabian formatting, grammar, and spelling. |
|
Bibliographic Information |
0–5 points · More than 3 errors · Does not show concern with following the bibliographic guidelines of current Turabian style. |
6–7 points · One to two Turabian errors in the bibliographic information. |
8–10 points · No errors. · Bibliographic information is fully consistent with current Turabian guidelines. |
|
Annotation |
0–25 points · Article annotations are either non-existent or unacceptable in their depth or breadth. |
26–27 points · Article annotations lack depth of summary and/or reflection. · Needs to “dig deeper” in the analysis and evaluation of the material. The author’s credibility is not clear. |
· Each resource is fully summarized. · Summary shows consistent understanding of the resources’ main points and a reflection on the importance of these main points for the Final Briefing Paper. The author’s credibility is expounded upon. |
|
Total: /50 |