Week 4 PPOL 650 Briefing Paper Annotated Bibli

profileMz Genuine
Briefing_Paper_Annotated_Bibliography_Grading_Rubric.docx

PPOL 650

Briefing Paper Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric

Student:

Criteria

Novice

Competent

Proficient

Formatting, Spelling, and Grammar

0–5 points

· Evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of graduate-level work.

6–7 points

· Acceptable work in most areas.

· Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding writing style, current Turabian formatting, grammar, and spelling.

8–10 points

· Superior work in all areas.

· Consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding writing style, current Turabian formatting, grammar, and spelling.

Bibliographic Information

0–5 points

· More than 3 errors

· Does not show concern with following the bibliographic guidelines of current Turabian style.

6–7 points

· One to two Turabian errors in the bibliographic information.

8–10 points

· No errors.

· Bibliographic information is fully consistent with current Turabian guidelines.

Annotation

0–25 points

· Article annotations are either non-existent or unacceptable in their depth or breadth.

26–27 points

· Article annotations lack depth of summary and/or reflection.

· Needs to “dig deeper” in the analysis and evaluation of the material. The author’s credibility is not clear.

28–30 points

· Each resource is fully summarized.

· Summary shows consistent understanding of the resources’ main points and a reflection on the importance of these main points for the Final Briefing Paper. The author’s credibility is expounded upon.

Total: /50