Sales and Operations Planning
1
| SERVICE | SERVICE MIX | LABOR HOURS PER JOB | a.) | b.) | |
| Light Cleaning | 20% | 0.2 | 0.04 | 10% | 0.02 |
| Medium Cleaning | 60% | 0.25 | 0.15 | 65% | 0.16 |
| Deep Cleaning | 20% | 0.35 | 0.07 | 25% | 0.09 |
| Weighted Planning Value | 0.26 | 0.27 | |||
| b.) The weighted planning value increased because a higher percentage of the service mix was in the more labor intense services. | |||||
2
| GAUGE SET | PRODUCT MIX | MACHINE HOURS PER UNIT | LABOR HOURS PER UNIT | a.) | b.) | |||
| Machine | Labor | Mix | Machine | Labor | ||||
| A20 | 60% | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 45% | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| B30 | 15% | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 30% | 0.11 | 0.03 |
| C40 | 25% | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 25% | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Weighted Planning Values | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.13 | ||||
| a.) The weighted planning values are the weighted average of the machine hours and labor hours required, based on the product mix. | ||||||||
| b.) The weighted planning values changed because of the change to the product mix. The greater percentage of B30 results in more machine hours and less labor hours, on average. | ||||||||
3
| Model | PRODUCT MIX | MACHINE HOURS PER UNIT | LABOR HOURS PER UNIT | a.) | b.) | |||
| Machine | Labor | Mix | Machine | Labor | ||||
| Deluxe Models | 45% | 10.0 | 5.0 | 4.50 | 2.25 | 30% | 3.00 | 1.50 |
| Regular Models | 30% | 8.0 | 4.0 | 2.40 | 1.20 | 30% | 2.40 | 1.20 |
| Economy Models | 25% | 6.0 | 3.5 | 1.50 | 0.88 | 40% | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Weighted Planning Values | 8.40 | 4.33 | 7.80 | 4.10 | ||||
| a.) The assumptions that must be made in order to use the weighted per-unit planning values for labor and machine time are that the averages of machine and labor hours are accurate (and there is a small standard deviation from the average) and that the product mix is accurate. | ||||||||
| c.) When the product mix changes from month to month, Bangor should use a bottom-up approach to sales and operations planning. Top-down approach should be used only when the product mix remains stable. | ||||||||
4
| MONTH | SALES FORECAST | WORKER HOURS | MACHINE HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED | MACHINES NEEDED |
| October | 44,000 | 39600 | 880 | 248 | 6 |
| November | 52,000 | 46800 | 1040 | 293 | 7 |
| December | 68,000 | 61200 | 1360 | 383 | 9 |
| January | 69,000 | 62100 | 1380 | 388 | 9 |
| February | 58,000 | 52200 | 1160 | 326 | 7 |
| March | 46,000 | 41400 | 920 | 259 | 6 |
| Average Worker Hours Per Unit | 0.9 | ||||
| Average Machine Hours Per Unit | 0.02 | ||||
| Hours Available Per Month | 160 |
5
| MONTH | FORECAST PRODUCT A | FORECAST PRODUCT B | a.) COMBINED FORECAST | b.) TOTAL LABOR HOURS REQUIRED |
| January | 3500 | 700 | 4200 | 10010 |
| February | 3300 | 1000 | 4300 | 10050 |
| March | 3200 | 1200 | 4400 | 10160 |
| April | 3000 | 1500 | 4500 | 10200 |
| May | 2700 | 1900 | 4600 | 10170 |
| June | 2600 | 2100 | 4700 | 10280 |
| Average Labor Per Product A | 2.5 | |||
| Average Labor Per Product B | 1.8 | |||
| a.) If the combined forecast was the only information available, an increase in resource requirements from January to June would be expected. | ||||
| b.) Although the total number of products forecasted increases from January to June, the product mix also changes. The result is that the total number of labor hours does not increase as much as would be expected if the only information available was the combined forecast. | ||||
| c.) Bottom-up planning would be better suited for S&OP in this situation because the product mix changes from month to month. Top-down planning should be used when the product mix is stable. | ||||
6
| MONTH | FORECASTED SALES | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 252 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 227 | 1,000 | |||||||
| March | 1,592 | 31,840 | 199 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 25 | 1,424 |
| April | 1,400 | 28,000 | 175 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,040 |
| May | 1,200 | 24,000 | 150 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,856 |
| June | 1,000 | 20,000 | 125 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,872 |
| July | 1,504 | 30,080 | 188 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 4,384 |
| August | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 4,408 |
| September | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,920 |
| October | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,432 |
| November | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,448 |
| December | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 1,464 |
| January | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 976 |
| February | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 1,000 |
| 227 | 25 | 0 | ||||||
| Totals | 24,192 | 24,192 | 25 | 25 | 32,224 | |||
| Costs | Information: | Layoff | Hiring | Inventory | ||||
| Hiring: | $75,000 | Totals: | 25 | 25 | 32,224 | |||
| Layoff: | $50,000 | Costs: | $50,000 | $75,000 | $193,334 | |||
| Inventory: | $193,344 | Cost of plan: | $318,334 | |||||
| Cost of plan: | $318,344 | Planning values | ||||||
| Starting inventory: | 1000 | |||||||
| Starting and ending workforce: | 227 | |||||||
| Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Hours per unit: | 20 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $3,000 | |||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $2,000 | |||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $6 |
7
| MONTH | FORECASTED SALES | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 252 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 227 | 1,000 | |||||||
| March | 1,592 | 31,840 | 199 | 199 | 1,592 | 28 | 0 | 1,000 |
| April | 1,400 | 28,000 | 175 | 175 | 1,400 | 24 | 0 | 1,000 |
| May | 1,200 | 24,000 | 150 | 150 | 1,200 | 25 | 0 | 1,000 |
| June | 1,000 | 20,000 | 125 | 125 | 1,000 | 25 | 0 | 1,000 |
| July | 1,504 | 30,080 | 188 | 188 | 1,504 | 0 | 63 | 1,000 |
| August | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 249 | 1,992 | 0 | 61 | 1,000 |
| September | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 313 | 2,504 | 0 | 64 | 1,000 |
| October | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 313 | 2,504 | 0 | 0 | 1,000 |
| November | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 375 | 3,000 | 0 | 62 | 1,000 |
| December | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 375 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,000 |
| January | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 313 | 2,504 | 62 | 0 | 1,000 |
| February | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 249 | 1,992 | 64 | 0 | 1,000 |
| 227 | 22 | 0 | ||||||
| Totals | 24,192 | 24,192 | 250 | 250 | 12,000 | |||
| Costs | Information: | Layoff | Hiring | Inventory | ||||
| Hiring: | $750,000 | Totals: | 250 | 250 | 12,000 | |||
| Layoff: | $500,000 | Costs: | $500,000 | $750,000 | $72,000 | |||
| Inventory: | $72,000 | Cost of plan: | $1,322,000 | |||||
| Cost of plan: | $1,322,000 | Planning values | ||||||
| Starting inventory: | 1000 | |||||||
| Starting and ending workforce: | 227 | |||||||
| Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Hours per unit: | 20 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $3,000 | |||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $2,000 | |||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $6 |
8
| MONTH | FORECASTED SALES | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 252 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 50 | 500 | |||||||
| March | 2,000 | 8,000 | 50 | 47 | 1,880 | 3 | 0 | 380 |
| April | 1,920 | 7,680 | 48 | 47 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 340 |
| May | 1,840 | 7,360 | 46 | 47 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 380 |
| June | 1,800 | 7,200 | 45 | 47 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 460 |
| July | 1,800 | 7,200 | 45 | 47 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 540 |
| August | 1,800 | 7,200 | 45 | 47 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 620 |
| September | 1,750 | 7,000 | 44 | 36 | 1,440 | 11 | 0 | 310 |
| October | 1,640 | 6,560 | 41 | 36 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 110 |
| 50 | 0 | 14 | ||||||
| Totals | 14,550 | 14,160 | 14 | 14 | 3,140 | |||
| Information: | Layoff | Hiring | Inventory | |||||
| Totals: | 14 | 14 | 3,140 | |||||
| Costs: | $2,800 | $4,200 | $12,560 | |||||
| Cost of plan: | $19,560 | |||||||
| Planning values | ||||||||
| Starting inventory: | 500 | |||||||
| Starting and ending workforce: | 50 | |||||||
| Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Hours per unit: | 4 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $300 | |||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $200 | |||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $4 | |||||||
| This production plan represents a mix strategy as there is a stable production for several months and then the production level changes for the final two months. The strategy is not completely level but it also does not chase the forecasted sales each month. | ||||||||
9
| MONTH | FORECASTED SALES | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 252 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 227 | 1,000 | |||||||
| March | 1,592 | 31,840 | 199 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 25 | 1,424 |
| April | 1,400 | 28,000 | 175 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,040 |
| May | 1,200 | 24,000 | 150 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,856 |
| June | 1,000 | 20,000 | 125 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,872 |
| July | 1,504 | 30,080 | 188 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 4,384 |
| August | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 4,408 |
| September | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,920 |
| October | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 3,432 |
| November | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 2,448 |
| December | 3,000 | 60,000 | 375 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 1,464 |
| January | 2,504 | 50,080 | 313 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 976 |
| February | 1,992 | 39,840 | 249 | 252 | 2,016 | 0 | 0 | 1,000 |
| 227 | 25 | 0 | ||||||
| Totals | 24,192 | 24,192 | 25 | 25 | 32,224 | |||
| Costs | Information: | Layoff | Hiring | Inventory | ||||
| Hiring: | $75,000 | Totals: | 25 | 25 | 32,224 | |||
| Layoff: | $50,000 | Costs: | $50,000 | $75,000 | $193,334 | |||
| Inventory: | $193,344 | Cost of plan: | $318,334 | |||||
| Cost of plan: | $318,344 | Planning values | ||||||
| Starting inventory: | 1000 | |||||||
| Starting and ending workforce: | 227 | |||||||
| Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Hours per unit: | 20 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $3,000 | |||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $2,000 | |||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $6 | |||||||
| The spreadsheet calculates new results for as the forecasted sales or actual workers values are changed. Besides slight formatting changes, this spreadsheet is the same as the one used to answer questions 6 and 7. | ||||||||
10
| Part a.) | ||||||||||
| MONTH | BEEFEATER FORECAST | DEUTSCHLANDER FORECAST | AGGREGATE FORECAST | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 75 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 20 | 0 | |||||||||
| Nov-16 | 650 | 3,048 | 3,698 | 11,834 | 74 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 55 | 52 |
| Dec-16 | 676 | 2,899 | 3,575 | 11,440 | 72 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 227 |
| Jan-17 | 624 | 3,198 | 3,822 | 12,230 | 76 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 155 |
| Feb-17 | 624 | 2,671 | 3,295 | 10,544 | 66 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 610 |
| Mar-17 | 696 | 2,919 | 3,615 | 11,568 | 72 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 745 |
| Apr-17 | 475 | 3,102 | 3,577 | 11,446 | 72 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 918 |
| May-17 | 566 | 2,964 | 3,530 | 11,296 | 71 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 1,138 |
| Jun-17 | 819 | 2,409 | 3,228 | 10,330 | 65 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 1,660 |
| Jul-17 | 754 | 3,381 | 4,135 | 13,232 | 83 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 1,275 |
| Aug-17 | 982 | 3,965 | 4,947 | 15,830 | 99 | 75 | 3,750 | 0 | 0 | 78 |
| 20 | 55 | 0 | ||||||||
| Totals | 37,422 | 37,500 | 55 | 55 | 6,858 | |||||
| Costs | Information: | |||||||||
| Hiring: | $16,500 | Starting inventory: | 0 | |||||||
| Layoff: | $16,500 | Starting and ending workforce: | 20 | |||||||
| Inventory: | $102,870 | Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Production: | $11,250,000 | Production cost per unit: | $300 | |||||||
| Cost of plan: | $11,385,870 | Hours per unit: | 3.2 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $300 | |||||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $300 | |||||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $15 | |||||||||
| Part b.) | ||||||||||
| MONTH | BEEFEATER FORECAST | DEUTSCHLANDER FORECAST | AGGREGATE FORECAST | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 75 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 20 | 0 | |||||||||
| Nov-16 | 650 | 3,048 | 3,698 | 11,834 | 74 | 74 | 3,700 | 0 | 54 | 2 |
| Dec-16 | 676 | 2,899 | 3,575 | 11,440 | 72 | 72 | 3,600 | 2 | 0 | 27 |
| Jan-17 | 624 | 3,198 | 3,822 | 12,230 | 76 | 76 | 3,800 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Feb-17 | 624 | 2,671 | 3,295 | 10,544 | 66 | 66 | 3,300 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Mar-17 | 696 | 2,919 | 3,615 | 11,568 | 72 | 72 | 3,600 | 0 | 6 | -5 |
| Apr-17 | 475 | 3,102 | 3,577 | 11,446 | 72 | 72 | 3,600 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| May-17 | 566 | 2,964 | 3,530 | 11,296 | 71 | 71 | 3,550 | 1 | 0 | 38 |
| Jun-17 | 819 | 2,409 | 3,228 | 10,330 | 65 | 65 | 3,250 | 6 | 0 | 60 |
| Jul-17 | 754 | 3,381 | 4,135 | 13,232 | 83 | 83 | 4,150 | 0 | 18 | 75 |
| Aug-17 | 982 | 3,965 | 4,947 | 15,830 | 99 | 99 | 4,950 | 0 | 16 | 78 |
| 20 | 79 | 0 | ||||||||
| Totals | 37,422 | 37,500 | 98 | 98 | 308 | |||||
| Costs | Information: | |||||||||
| Hiring: | $29,400 | Starting inventory: | 0 | |||||||
| Layoff: | $29,400 | Starting and ending workforce: | 20 | |||||||
| Inventory: | $4,620 | Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||||
| Production: | $11,250,000 | Production cost per unit: | $300 | |||||||
| Cost of plan: | $11,313,420 | Hours per unit: | 3.2 | |||||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $300 | |||||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $300 | |||||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $15 | |||||||||
| Part c.) | ||||||||||
| If hiring and layoff costs increased dramatically the level plan would be less expensive than the chase plan. This is because of the difference between the number of hirings and layoffs in the two plans. The chase plan is much more sensitive to changes in the hiring and layoff costs while the level plan is more sensitive to changes in inventory costs. | ||||||||||
11
| MONTH | SALES FORECAST | REGULAR PRODUCTION | OVERTIME PRODUCTION | INVENTORY / BACKORDERS | CASH INFLOWS | CASH OUTFLOWS | NET FLOW | CUMULATIVE NET FLOW |
| 100 | ||||||||
| January | 750 | 840 | 0 | 190 | $2,100,000 | $1,687,600 | $412,400 | $412,400 |
| February | 760 | 840 | 0 | 270 | $2,128,000 | $1,690,800 | $437,200 | $849,600 |
| March | 800 | 840 | 0 | 310 | $2,240,000 | $1,692,400 | $547,600 | $1,397,200 |
| April | 800 | 840 | 0 | 350 | $2,240,000 | $1,694,000 | $546,000 | $1,943,200 |
| May | 820 | 840 | 0 | 370 | $2,296,000 | $1,694,800 | $601,200 | $2,544,400 |
| June | 840 | 840 | 0 | 370 | $2,352,000 | $1,694,800 | $657,200 | $3,201,600 |
| July | 910 | 840 | 0 | 300 | $2,548,000 | $1,692,000 | $856,000 | $4,057,600 |
| August | 910 | 840 | 0 | 230 | $2,548,000 | $1,689,200 | $858,800 | $4,916,400 |
| September | 910 | 840 | 0 | 160 | $2,548,000 | $1,686,400 | $861,600 | $5,778,000 |
| October | 880 | 840 | 0 | 120 | $2,464,000 | $1,684,800 | $779,200 | $6,557,200 |
| November | 860 | 840 | 0 | 100 | $2,408,000 | $1,684,000 | $724,000 | $7,281,200 |
| December | 840 | 840 | 0 | 100 | $2,352,000 | $1,684,000 | $668,000 | $7,949,200 |
| Information: | ||||||||
| Cash inflow per cabinet: | $2,800 | |||||||
| Regular production outflow: | $2,000 | |||||||
| Overtime production outflow: | $0 | |||||||
| Monthly inventory holding cost: | $40 | |||||||
| When comparing this option to the mix strategy shown in Table 10.10, finance would likely select the mix strategy over the level strategy shown here. The mix strategy accumulates a higher net cash flow and does so quicker during the year than the level plan. | ||||||||
12
| Part a.) | ||||||||
| MONTH | SALES FORECAST | REGULAR PRODUCTION | OVERTIME PRODUCTION | ENDING INVENTORY | CASH INFLOWS | CASH OUTFLOWS | NET FLOW | CUMULATIVE NET FLOW |
| 0 | ||||||||
| January | 800 | 1150 | 0 | 350 | $400,000 | $406,000 | ($6,000) | ($6,000) |
| February | 1000 | 1150 | 0 | 500 | $500,000 | $407,500 | $92,500 | $86,500 |
| March | 1200 | 1150 | 0 | 450 | $600,000 | $407,000 | $193,000 | $279,500 |
| April | 1400 | 1150 | 0 | 200 | $700,000 | $404,500 | $295,500 | $575,000 |
| May | 1600 | 1150 | 150 | 0 | $800,000 | $470,000 | $330,000 | $905,000 |
| June | 1500 | 1150 | 350 | 0 | $750,000 | $560,000 | $190,000 | $1,095,000 |
| Information: | ||||||||
| Cash inflow per cabinet: | $500 | |||||||
| Regular production outflow: | $350 | |||||||
| Overtime production outflow: | $450 | |||||||
| Monthly inventory holding cost: | $10 | |||||||
| b.) The net cash flows for April and May are much higher than the other months because the number of units sold is much higher than the number of units produced. The implications of building up and draining down inventory are that the production costs will remain stable, although inventory costs may be high. | ||||||||
13
| S&OP Spreadsheet | ||||||||
| Labor hrs. per unit: | 20 | |||||||
| Worker hrs. per month: | 160 | |||||||
| Beginning & ending workforce: | 100 | |||||||
| Beginning & ending inventory: | 100 | |||||||
| Total plan cost | ||||||||
| Production cost per unit: | $550.00 | $6,600,000 | ||||||
| Hiring cost: | $300.00 | $37,500 | ||||||
| Layoff cost: | $200.00 | $25,000 | ||||||
| Holding cost per unit per month: | $4.00 | $4,800 | ||||||
| $6,667,300 | Grand total | |||||||
| Month | Sales Forecast | Sales (in labor hrs.) | Sales (in workers) | Actual Workers | Actual Production | Hirings | Layoffs | Ending Inventory / Back Orders |
| 100 | 100 | |||||||
| January | 500 | 10,000 | 62.5 | 62.50 | 500.00 | 0.00 | 37.50 | 100.00 |
| February | 600 | 12,000 | 75.0 | 75.00 | 600.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| March | 700 | 14,000 | 87.5 | 87.50 | 700.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| April | 800 | 16,000 | 100.0 | 100.00 | 800.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| May | 900 | 18,000 | 112.5 | 112.50 | 900.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| June | 1,000 | 20,000 | 125.0 | 125.00 | 1,000.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| July | 1,000 | 20,000 | 125.0 | 125.00 | 1,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| August | 1,100 | 22,000 | 137.5 | 137.50 | 1,100.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| September | 1,200 | 24,000 | 150.0 | 150.00 | 1,200.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| October | 1,300 | 26,000 | 162.5 | 162.50 | 1,300.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| November | 1,400 | 28,000 | 175.0 | 175.00 | 1,400.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| December | 1,500 | 30,000 | 187.5 | 187.50 | 1,500.00 | 12.50 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| 100 | 0.00 | 87.50 | ||||||
| Totals: | 12,000 | 12,000.00 | 125.00 | 125.00 | 1,200.00 | |||
| Average: | 125 |
14
| Sales & Operations Planning Spreadsheet for Kumquats Unlimited | ||||||||
| (with solver optimization) | ||||||||
| Production cost per batch: | $2,400 | Production costs: | $14,448,000 | |||||
| Line hours per batch: | 16 | Line start-up costs: | $300,000 | |||||
| Production line hours per month: | 320 | hours | Line shutdown costs: | $72,000 | ||||
| Cost to start up a line: | $25,000 | Inventory holding costs: | $144,000 | |||||
| Cost to shut down a line: | $6,000 | |||||||
| Inventory holding cost: | $300 | per batch, per month | Grand total: | $14,964,000 | ||||
| Beginning and ending lines: | 55 | production lines | ||||||
| Beginning and ending inventory: | 100 | batches | ||||||
| Month | Sales Forecast | Sales (in line hours) | Sales (in production lines) | Actual Production Lines | Actual Production | Production Line Start-ups | Production Line Shutdowns | Ending Inventory |
| 55 | 100 | |||||||
| January | 1,000 | 16,000 | 50 | 55.00 | 1,100 | 0 | 0 | 200 |
| February | 1,200 | 19,200 | 60 | 55.00 | 1,100 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| March | 1,200 | 19,200 | 60 | 55.00 | 1,100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| April | 1,000 | 16,000 | 50 | 50.00 | 1,000 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| May | 800 | 12,800 | 40 | 43.00 | 860 | 0 | 7 | 60 |
| June | 800 | 12,800 | 40 | 43.00 | 860 | 0 | 0 | 120 |
| 55 | 12 | 0 | ||||||
| Total = | 6,000 | 6,020 | 12 | 12 | 480 | |||
| Average = | 50 |
CaseStudy
| MONTH | SALES FORECAST | SALES IN WORKER HOURS | WORKERS NEEDED TO MEET SALES AVERAGE = 49 | ACTUAL WORKERS | ACTUAL PRODUCTION | LAYOFFS | HIRINGS | ENDING INVENTORY |
| 50 | 10,000 | |||||||
| September-17 | 30,000 | 7,500 | 47 | 49 | 31,360 | 1 | 0 | 11,360 |
| October-17 | 31,500 | 7,875 | 49 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 11,220 |
| November-17 | 35,000 | 8,750 | 55 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 7,580 |
| December-17 | 37,000 | 9,250 | 58 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 1,940 |
| January-18 | 22,000 | 5,500 | 34 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 11,300 |
| February-18 | 18,000 | 4,500 | 28 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 24,660 |
| March-18 | 17,500 | 4,375 | 27 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 38,520 |
| April-18 | 27,000 | 6,750 | 42 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 42,880 |
| May-18 | 38,000 | 9,500 | 59 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 36,240 |
| June-18 | 40,000 | 10,000 | 63 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 27,600 |
| July-18 | 42,000 | 10,500 | 66 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 16,960 |
| August-18 | 40,000 | 10,000 | 63 | 49 | 31,360 | 0 | 0 | 8,320 |
| 50 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
| Totals | 378,000 | 376,320 | 1 | 1 | 238,580 | |||
| Costs | Information: | |||||||
| Hiring: | $1,250 | Starting inventory: | 10,000 | |||||
| Layoff: | $500 | Starting and ending workforce: | 50 | |||||
| Inventory: | $1,908,640 | Hours worked per month per worker: | 160 | |||||
| Production: | $28,035,840 | Production cost per unit: | $74.50 | |||||
| Cost of plan: | $29,946,230 | Hours per unit: | 0.25 | |||||
| Hiring cost per worker: | $1,250 | |||||||
| Layoff cost per worker: | $500 | |||||||
| Monthly per-unit holding cost: | $8 | |||||||
| Plant capacity: | 35,000 | |||||||
| Question 1.) Advantages to a level production plan are that the hiring and layoff costs are very low and the company is able to meet overall sales forecast without expanding current plant capacity. Covolo could not implement a pure chase plan because capacity is currently 35,000 per month. If sales continue to grow, Covolo will need to consider how to add additional production capacity. | ||||||||
| Question 2.) Monthly S&OP updates will rolling planning horizons will help alleviate Patricia's concerns because there will be an opportunity to adjust the sales forecast every month. Significant advantages to S&OP, even though forecasts may change, include bringing marketing, operations, and finance together to agree upon the plan for the coming months and how to best handle changes in the forecast. | ||||||||
| Question 3.) I agree with David Griffin *if* the cost of retaining an employee while not producing is less or equal to the cost of a layoff plus a new hire. Holding costs of an existing employee include their salary and benefits paid, while producing an extra gauge results in materials and inventory costs. If workers are idle, the production cost per unit will increase to distribute the cost of the employee over fewer units. | ||||||||