4mat Review Mcminn

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Advanced Pro�cient Developing Not Present

Content-Summary 17 (13.60%) - 19 (15.20%)

Summary is approximately two pages and contains: A concise, insightful, and adequate synopsis of the text. The main thesis idea and core ideas of the text A foundation for the subsequent sections of the paper.

15 (12.00%) - 16 (12.80%)

Summary is unclear and/or wordy, illogical and inconsistent with the contents of the book Summary does not include the main thesis idea and core ideas of the text. Summary does not provide a strong the foundation for the subsequent sections of paper.

1 (0.80%) - 14 (11.20%)

Summary is unclear and illogical. Main thesis and important main ideas of the text are not included and the �ow of thought lacks a logical connection with the text.

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Not discussed.

Content-Concrete Response

17 (13.60%) - 19 (15.20%)

Concrete Response is approximately 1 page and contains: A personal life episode, parable, case study, or confession. Content is based on the main points (not tangential ideas) discussed in the Summary section.

15 (12.00%) - 16 (12.80%)

Concrete Response is limited in scope and does not provide su�cient personal life story and/or is not based upon Summary section of the paper.

1 (0.80%) - 14 (11.20%)

Concrete Response does not re�ect adequate self- exploration of an important theme from the Summary section.

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

This area is not included in the paper.

Content-Re�ection 17 (13.60%) - 19 (15.20%)

Re�ection is approximately 1 page (or more if needed) and contains: Questions, criticism, etc. Positives and negatives about the book. Concise critique of the strengths and weaknesses. Re�ection is based on the main ideas of the book, not tangential issues.

15 (12.00%) - 16 (12.80%)

Re�ection is limited in scope by presentation of questions and/or concise critique of the text. The re�ections do not address strengths and weaknesses of the text’s main ideas and thesis, but focuses more on tangential issues (e.g. author’s writing style etc.)

1 (0.80%) - 14 (11.20%)

Re�ection is extremely limited in o�ering questions and/or concise critique of the text. The re�ections do not address strengths and weaknesses of the text’s main ideas and thesis, but focuses more on tangential issues (e.g. author’s writing style etc.)

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

No Re�ection of o�ered

Content – Theological Interaction

17 (13.60%) - 19 (15.20%)

Theological Interaction is approximately 2 pages and contains: A

15 (12.00%) - 16 (12.80%)

The position the student takes is limited and not thorough

1 (0.80%) - 14 (11.20%)

The position the student takes is extremely weak and

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

No position taken

Name: 4MAT Review Grading Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

  Advanced Pro�cient Developing Not Present

pages and contains: A thorough interaction with the posed question in the instructions. The position the student takes is solid and supported by Scripture, the text assigned, and other source(s). The student is able to share both the strengths and potential weaknesses of their position.

and not thorough. Positions that the student takes are not backed up by Scripture, or there are not other references used to back up their argument. The argument focuses on tangential issues and not the main question.

extremely weak and not coherent. Ideas and positions are not backed up by Scripture and references. The position is purely opinion and not based upon solid arguments.

Concrete-Action 17 (13.60%) - 19 (15.20%)

Action is approximately 1 page or less and contains: Steps of action you will take based on the book’s main ideas. Description of how the main ideas will a�ect your counseling. The personal or professional changes you will implement (and share with others) as a result of reading this book.

15 (12.00%) - 16 (12.80%)

Action description is inadequately related to main ideas of the text and provides only limited development of how the text ideas will a�ect one’s counseling practice as well as personal and/or professional changes.

1 (0.80%) - 14 (11.20%)

Action description is inadequately related to main ideas of the text and underdeveloped regarding how the ideas will a�ect one’s counseling practice as well as personal and/or professional changes.

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

There is no application made

Mechanics 21 (16.80%) - 23 (18.40%)

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

19 (15.20%) - 20 (16.00%)

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is su�cient. Word choice is adequate.

1 (0.80%) - 18 (14.40%)

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are misused. Writing style is di�cult to understand. Word choice is poor.

APA Format Elements 6 (4.80%) - 7 (5.60%)

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. An Abstract is not needed.

3 (2.40%) - 5 (4.00%)

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

1 (0.80%) - 2 (1.60%)

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Citations, Running head, and References are included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 (0.00%) - 0 (0.00%)

Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, Running head, and References are not included or not formatted correctly. Paper is not double- spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect.

Name:4MAT Review Grading Rubric Exit